Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
W. Katz (1969)
Introduction to reference work
(1993)
A reply to Willis and Matysek,
Jonathan Furner-Hines, P. Willett (1995)
The use of the World‐Wide Web in UK academic libraries, 47
J. Rettig (1987)
The Reference Reviewer's ResponsibilitiesThe Reference Librarian, 6
(1990)
Answering ready reference
(1995)
Testing the quality of CD-ROM databases,
S. Starr (1994)
Evaluating physical science reference sources on the internetThe Reference Librarian, 19
K. Doran (1995)
The Internot: Helping Library Patrons Understand What the Internet Is Not (Yet).Computers in libraries, 15
W. Havener (1990)
Answering Ready Reference Questions: Print versus Online.Online, 14
Edmund SantaVicca (1994)
The Internet as a Reference and Research ToolThe Reference Librarian, 19
D. Grogan (1979)
Practical Reference Work
(1995)
Internet success stories: how librarians use the Internet as a reference tool,
(1993)
The ultimate reference tool,
Louella Wetherbee, A. Lipow (1993)
Rethinking reference in academic libraries : the proceedings and process of Library Solutions Institute no. 2, University of California, Berkeley, March 12-14, 1993, Duke University, June 4-6, 1993
Robert Broadus (1973)
Selecting Materials for Libraries
M. Bates (1986)
What Is a Reference Book? A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis., 26
Charles Bailey, Dana Rooks (1991)
Symposium on the Role of Network-Based Electronic Resources in Scholarly Communication and ResearchThe Public-Access Computer Systems Review, 2
Geetali Basu (1995)
Using Internet for reference: myths vs. realitiesComputers in libraries, 15
Allen Benson (1995)
The complete Internet companion for librarians
Jan Horner, Nicole Michaud-Oystryk (1995)
The Efficiency and Success Rates of Print Ready Reference vs Online Ready Reference Searches in Canadian University Libraries.The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 21
Analyzes the Internet as a reference tool based on its ability to provide rapid access to authoritative information or sources of information. Reveals that the Internet provides no comprehensive mechanism for identifying quality information. Bibliographic structure is also disparate, making it impossible to adopt a coherent strategy for identifying quality information. A unified service interface would help alleviate this problem. An analysis of the use of the Internet by academic librarians reveals that existing bibliographic structure is not used to best advantage. Simple strategies which would limit these deficiencies, such as the use of electronic mail, are not used. Suitable training, from an introductory to advanced level, would alleviate this problem. Suggests the use of an amended version of Benson’s decision tree as a pedagogical tool. This model would help to decide when to use the Internet and suggest search paths for different question types.
Internet Research – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 1, 1997
Keywords: Academic libraries; Bibliographies; Internet; Referencing
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.