Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Rodrigo Arocena (2007)
Sobre la democratización de la ciencia y la tecnología, 2
C. Lyall, A. Bruce, J. Tait, Laura Meagher (2011)
Interdisciplinary Research Journeys: Practical Strategies for Capturing Creativity
U. Segerstrale (2001)
Real Science. What it is, and what it meansEndeavour, 25
W. Newell, J. Wentworth, David Sebberson (2001)
A Theory of Interdisciplinary Studies
Henrik Bruun, J. Hukkinen, K. Huutoniemi, J. Klein (2005)
Promoting Interdisciplinary Research The Case of the Academy of Finland
A. Repko (2011)
Interdisciplinary Research: Process and Theory
Purpose – This paper presents the preliminary results of a research which relates two main strands: first, the socialization of scientific knowledge and second, the archaeological heritage. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the socialization process by integrating an “inter-approach” strategy in order to cope with the research problem. It also evaluates the potential of an interdisciplinary approach following the hypothesis that it strengthens the democratization process of scientific knowledge production. Design/methodology/approach – The combination, integration and convergence of different bodies of knowledge seek to collaborate in the construction of an enriching process looking for a stronger relationship between science and society. This is applied to a particular case study: the archaeological heritage of Uruguay. This study relates the concept of socialization of scientific knowledge to the strand of archaeological heritage through the construction of a common structure. Findings – In this sense, the authors study the socialization process of scientific knowledge in a way that helps illustrate its current features in Uruguay. It also permits us to consider socialization as a more committed process of identity construction in Uruguayan society. Originality/value – Socialization processes help to build the identity of a society in the interaction with science; socialization of Uruguayan archaeological heritage allows the creation of a shared memory embedded into the historical processes of the country. However, it requires an integrated and multivocal perspective to cope with its inherent complexity. In this sense, this research fills a void.
Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 13, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.