Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Sofie Roy (1999)
Managing Intellectual Capital: The Work with the Navigator in the Skandia GroupJournal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 4
Jeffrey Unerman, J. Guthrie, L. Striukova (2007)
UK Reporting of Intellectual Capital
R. Kaplan, D. Norton (1996)
Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management systemHarvard Business Review, 74
Zhen Deng, B. Lev, F. Narin (1999)
Science and Technology as Predictors of Stock PerformanceFinancial Analysts Journal, 55
Mark Lang, Russell Lundholm (1993)
CROSS- SECTIONAL DETERMINANTS OF ANALYST RATINGS OF CORPORATE DISCLOSURESJournal of Accounting Research, 31
Karl-Erik Sveiby (1997)
The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets
C. Ittner, D. Larcker (1998)
Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfactionJournal of Accounting Research, 36
Emma García‐Meca, I. Parra, M. Larrán, I. Martínez (2005)
The explanatory factors of intellectual capital disclosure to financial analystsEuropean Accounting Review, 14
Manuel García-Ayuso (2003)
Intangibles: Lessons from the past and a look into the futureJournal of Intellectual Capital, 4
Anna Rylander, K. Jacobsen, G. Roos (2000)
Towards improved information disclosure on intellectual capitalInt. J. Technol. Manag., 20
P. Bukh, U. Johanson
Research and knowledge interaction: guidelines for intellectual capital reporting
Richard Petty, J. Guthrie (2000)
The Case for Reporting on Intellectual Capital: Evidence, Analysis and Future Trends
P. Bukh, J. Mouritsen, Kirsten Flagstad, S. Thorbjørnsen, M. Johansen, S. Kotnis, H. Larsen, C. Nielsen, Isa Kjærgaard, Lotte Krag, Gustav Jeppesen, Jens Haisler, Benedikte Stakemann (2003)
Intellectual capital statements: the new guideline
E. Amir, B. Lev, Theodore Sougiannis (1999)
What Value Analysts?Financial Accounting
K. Leitner, Campbell Warden (2004)
Managing and reporting knowledge-based resources and processes in research organisations: specifics, lessons learned and perspectivesManagement Accounting Research, 15
Mary Barth, Ron Kasznik, M. McNichols (2000)
Analyst Coverage and Intangible AssetsSPGMI: Compustat Fundamentals (Topic)
A. Brooking
Intellectual Capital
P. Sullivan (2000)
Value Driven Intellectual Capital: How to Convert Intangible Corporate Assets Into Market Value
P. Healy, Amy Hutton, K. Palepu (1999)
Stock Performance and Intermediation Changes Surrounding Sustained Increases in DisclosureContemporary Accounting Research, 16
(2000)
THE MEASUREMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL: AN INTRODUCTION
P. Bukh, Ulf Johanson (2003)
Research and knowledge interactionJournal of Intellectual Capital, 4
L. Edvinsson, M. Malone (1997)
Intellectual Capital: Realizing Your Company's True Value by Finding Its Hidden Brainpower
T. Johnson, R. Kaplan (1987)
Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting
Richard Petty, J. Guthrie (2000)
INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL LITERATURE REVIEW: MEASUREMENT, REPORTING AND MANAGEMENTJournal of Intellectual Capital, 1
L. Edvinsson (1997)
Developing intellectual capital at SkandiaLong Range Planning, 30
(2005)
THE ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF CORPORATE FINANCIAL REPORTING
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to offer an empirical account of how a group of financial professionals uses intellectual capital (IC) information, and the value that the group imputes to IC reporting. The paper also aims to understand the group's ability to privately access information that might help them determine the value of a company's IC in support of their decision‐making. Design/methodology/approach – Survey administered to a group of financial professionals in Hong Kong. Findings – Respondents would like companies to be more transparent and provide more information on their IC. Respondents believe that greater IC disclosure would be rewarded with an increase in the company's share price – even though few respondents thought that they would pay more themselves for enhanced disclosure. Further, most respondents seem to be currently addressing their IC information needs through private information channels, and rate the publicly provided information as poorly suited to their needs. Practical implications – Greater regulatory control may be needed to ensure that information being communicated privately also enters the public domain in a timely fashion. It is also suggested that making market participants more aware of the positive effects of voluntary disclosure on stock prices may lead to an increase in voluntary disclosure. Originality/value – The paper provides empirical evidence on the value relevance of IC information from a user's perspective.
Management Research News – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 23, 2008
Keywords: Intellectual capital; Disclosure; Regulation; Accounting
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.