Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Dibella, E. Nevis (1997)
How Organizations Learn: An Integrated Strategy for Building Learning Capability
Jian Qin, Naybell Hernández (2006)
Building interoperable vocabulary and structures for learning objectsJ. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 57
W. Deming (1982)
Out of the Crisis
Jia Wang, H. Dewhirst (1992)
Boards of directors and stakeholder orientationJournal of Business Ethics, 11
D. Schendel, Charles Hofer (1980)
Strategic management : a new view of business policy and planningAdministrative Science Quarterly, 25
J. Leigh, S. Waddock (2006)
The Emergence of Total Responsibility Management Systems: J. Sainsbury's (plc) Voluntary Responsibility Management Systems for Global Food Retail Supply ChainsBusiness and Society Review, 111
S. Waddock, Charles. Bodwell, J. Leigh (2007)
Total Responsibility Management: The Manual
Edward Freeman, J. Liedtka (1997)
Stakeholder capitalism and the value chainEuropean Management Journal, 15
T. Garavan (2013)
Strategic Human Resource Development.Journal of European Industrial Training, 15
J. March (1991)
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational LearningOrganization Science, 2
R. Freeman (1994)
The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future DirectionsBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 4
Jeff Frooman (1999)
Stakeholder Influence StrategiesAcademy of Management Review, 24
R. Freeman, W. Evan (1990)
Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretationJournal of Behavioral Economics, 19
S. Waddock, Charles. Bodwell (2004)
Managing Responsibility: What Can Be Learned from the Quality Movement?California Management Review, 47
Eric Orts, A. Strudler (2002)
The Ethical and Environmental Limits of Stakeholder TheoryBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 12
R. Phillips (2003)
What Stakeholder Theory is NotBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 13
R. Freeman, A. Wicks, B. Parmar (2004)
Stakeholder Theory and "The Corporate Objective Revisited"Organ. Sci., 15
M. Clarkson (1995)
A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social PerformanceAcademy of Management Review, 20
I. Nonaka (1994)
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge CreationOrganization Science, 5
Gary Hamel, C. Prahalad (1994)
Competing for the Future
John Mitchell (1999)
ETHICS AND INTERNATIONAL BUSINESSAnnual Review of Energy and The Environment, 24
Ronald Mitchell, Bradley Agle, D. Wood (1997)
Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really CountsAcademy of Management Review, 22
T. Donaldson, L. Preston (1995)
The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and ImplicationsAcademy of Management Review, 20
Henry Oliver, M. Friedman (1963)
Capitalism and FreedomSouthern Economic Journal, 30
S. Colafranceschi
Autogrill: An Italian History
R. Phillips (1997)
Stakeholder Theory and A Principle of FairnessBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 7
K. Goodpaster (1991)
Business Ethics and Stakeholder AnalysisBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 1
M. Walton
Deming management at work: six successful companies that use the quality principles of the world‐famous W. Edwards Deming
P. Senge, Göran Carstedt (2001)
Innovating Our Way to the Next Industrial RevolutionMIT Sloan Management Review, 42
E.R. Freeman
Stakeholder theory of the modern corporation, the moral responsibility of corporations
Ramakrishna Velamuri, Sankaran Venkataraman (2005)
Why Stakeholder And Stockholder Theories Are Not Necessarily Contradictory: A Knightian InsightJournal of Business Ethics, 61
P. Senge (1991)
The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge
E. Bernays (1975)
Social responsibility of businessPublic Relations Review, 1
L. Preston, H. Sapienza (1990)
Stakeholder management and corporate performanceJournal of Behavioral Economics, 19
S. Waddock, Samuel Graves (1997)
Finding the Link Between Stakeholder Relations and Quality of Management, 6
S. Waddock, Samuel Graves (1997)
Quality of Management and Quality of Stakeholder RelationsBusiness & Society, 36
I. Nonaka, H. Takeuchi (1995)
The Knowledge-Creating Company: How
R. Freeman, Robert Phillips (2002)
Stakeholder Theory: A Libertarian DefenseBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 12
Laura Dunham, R. Freeman, J. Liedtka (2006)
Enhancing Stakeholder Practice: A Particularized Exploration of CommunityBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 16
Roger Gordon, Wei Li (1999)
Government as a Discriminating Monopolist in the Financial Market: the Case of ChinaRegulation of Financial Institutions eJournal
R. Freeman (2010)
Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach
J. Child, Alexei Marcoux (1999)
Freeman and Evan: Stakeholder Theory in the Original PositionBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 9
M. Pedler, T. Boydell, J. Burgoyne (1989)
The Learning CompanyStudies in Continuing Education, 11
S. Waddock, Charles. Bodwell, Samuel Graves (2002)
Responsibility: The new business imperativeAcademy of Management Perspectives, 16
S. Appelbaum, John Gallagher (2000)
The competitive advantage of organizational learningJournal of Workplace Learning, 12
G. Rusconi, R. Freeman, Michele Dorigatti (2007)
Teoria degli stakeholder, 7
R. Stake (2005)
Qualitative Case Studies.
A. Zanini (2004)
Etica ed Economia
Richard Marens, A. Wicks (1999)
Getting Real: Stakeholder Theory, Managerial Practice, and the General Irrelevance of Fiduciary Duties Owed to ShareholdersBusiness Ethics Quarterly, 9
M. Ariño, Juan Vazquez-Dodero, S. Velamuri (2008)
Holistic Decision Making and Long Term Firm Performance
Purpose – The purpose of this research is to provide an insight into the learning process leading to the integration of company responsibility, in companies that are moving from a generic approach of Corporate Social Responsibility towards a holistic approach of stakeholder management. The analysis of a case study of a multinational Italian company, Autogrill Group S.p.a., will be explored as an organizational learning process using the framework of a recent approach of Total Responsibility Management. Design/methodology/approach – The method of qualitative research is based on the analysis of the theory of the subject and through the use of various techniques to study the case to give a longitudinal perspective. Findings – The use of the case study suggests that the path from a CSR perspective toward a stakeholder management model of responsibility is a “gradual” learning process that requires vision, commitment, integration, innovation, competence, management systems and resources. This learning process is also very important as a “catalyst” of innovation and for the continuous improvement of the company. Research limitations/implications – In this research the aim is to inquire: How do companies learn to integrate their responsibilities in the process of management, moving from a generic approach of CSR toward a holistic approach of stakeholder management? Originality/value – The stakeholder management model of Total Responsibility Management in this research is used to assist understanding the importance of managing the company responsibly and to show a way of reading the progress of a multinational company, which is on the path towards a more stakeholder‐oriented model of responsibility.
Journal of Management Development – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 25, 2011
Keywords: Responsibility management; Sustainability management; Corporate Social Responsibility; Stakeholders; Total Responsibility Management; Stakeholder engagement; Case studies; Italy
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.