Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Simo, R. Taylor (1985)
Consistent tangent operators for rate-independent elastoplasticity☆Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 48
K. Runesson, S. Sture, K. Willam (1988)
Integration in computational plasticityComputers & Structures, 30
E. Pramono, K. Willam (1989)
Implicit integration of composite yield surfaces with cornersEngineering Computations, 6
M. Ortiz, J. Simo (1986)
An analysis of a new class of integration algorithms for elastoplastic constitutive relationsInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 23
C. Comi, A. Corigliano, G. Maier (1991)
Extremum properties of finite-step solutions in elastoplasticity with nonlinear mixed hardeningInternational Journal of Solids and Structures, 27
K. Runesson, A. Samuelsson, Lars Bernspång (1986)
Numerical technique in plasticity including solution advancement controlInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 22
G. Etse, K. Willam (1994)
Fracture Energy Formulation for Inelastic Behavior of Plain ConcreteJournal of Engineering Mechanics-asce, 120
M. Ortiz, E. Popov (1985)
Accuracy and stability of integration algorithms for elastoplastic constitutive relationsInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 21
G. Novati (2018)
ATTI ACCADEMIA NAZIONALE DEI LINCEI CLASSE SCIENZE FISICHE MATEMATICHE NATURALI RENDICONTI
Claes Johnson (1976)
On finite element methods for plasticity problemsNumerische Mathematik, 26
Presents a computational algorithm for the numerical integration of triaxial concrete plasticity formulations. The specific material formulation at hand is the so‐called extended leon model for concrete. It is based on the flow theory of plasticity which entails isotropic hardening as well as fracture energy‐based softening in addition to non‐associated plastic flow. The numerical algorithm resorts to implicit integration according to the backward Euler strategy that enforces plastic consistency according to the closes‐point‐projection method (generalized radial‐return strategy). Numerical simulations illustrate the overall performance of the proposed algorithm and the significant increase of the convergence rate when the algorithmic tangent is used in place of the continuum operator.
Engineering Computations: International Journal for Computer-Aided Engineering and Software – Emerald Publishing
Published: Dec 1, 1996
Keywords: Algorithms; Plasticity
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.