Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
This is the second part of a multipart series on performance issues in library automation, especially as they pertain to the RFP process. In the last issue, I discussed some of the kinds of questions that should be posed by a library considering a new automation system or a significant upgrade to an existing system. These were questions the library needed to answer in order to prepare for developing the part of the RFP that is related to performance concerns. In this issue, I will go through a semifictitious RFP as an example of how it is usually done and what is wrong with that.
Academic and Library Computing – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 1, 1991
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.