Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Henty (2007)
Ten Major Issues in Providing a Repository Service in Australian UniversitiesD Lib Mag., 13
Wu, J. Kratzer, Christopher Lettl, N. Franke, P. Gloor (2016)
Institutional Repository
Philip Davis, B. Lewenstein, Daniel Simon, J. Booth, Mathew Connolly (2008)
Open access publishing, article downloads, and citations: randomised controlled trialThe BMJ, 337
G. Eysenbach (2006)
The Open Access AdvantageJournal of Medical Internet Research, 8
Alesia Zuccala, C. Oppenheim, Rajveen Dhiensa (2008)
Managing and evaluating digital repositoriesInf. Res., 13
H. Moed (2005)
Statistical relationships between downloads and citations at the level of individual documents within a single journal: Book ReviewsJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 56
K. Antelman (2004)
Do Open-Access Articles Have a Greater Research Impact?College & Research Libraries, 65
P. Zuber (2008)
A Study of Institutional Repository Holdings by Academic DisciplineD Lib Mag., 14
B. Chawner, R. Cullen (2009)
INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES AND THE ROLE OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIES IN SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION
Soo Rieh, K. Markey, B. Jean, E. Yakel, Jihyun Kim (2007)
Census of Institutional Repositories in the U.S.: A Comparison Across Institutions at Different Stages of IR DevelopmentD Lib Mag., 13
Emilia Branny (2007)
Automatic summary evaluation based on text grammarsJ. Digit. Inf., 8
P. Genoni (2004)
Content in institutional repositories: a collection management issueLibrary Management, 25
R. Cullen, B. Chawner (2011)
Institutional Repositories, Open Access, and Scholarly Communication: A Study of Conflicting Paradigms.The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37
Claire Creaser, S. White (2004)
Scholarly Journal Prices: Selected Trends and Comparisons
J. Hendler (2007)
Reinventing Academic Publishing-Part 1IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22
Jihyun Kim (2007)
Motivating and Impeding Factors Affecting Faculty Contribution to Institutional RepositoriesJ. Digit. Inf., 8
M. Heath, M. Jubb, D. Robey (2008)
E-Publication and Open Access in the Arts and Humanities in the UK
R. Cullen, Haruki Nagata (2008)
Academic Libraries in JapanThe Journal of Academic Librarianship, 34
L. Carr, T. Brody (2007)
Size isn’t everything: sustainable repositories as evidenced by sustainable deposit profilesD-lib Magazine, 13
Chawki Hajjem, S. Harnad, Y. Gingras (2005)
Ten-Year Cross-Disciplinary Comparison of the Growth of Open Access and How it Increases Research Citation ImpactArXiv, abs/cs/0606079
R. Cullen, B. Chawner
Institutional repositories in tertiary institutions: access, delivery, and performance
C. Lynch (2003)
Institutional Repositories: Essential Infrastructure For Scholarship In The Digital Ageportal: Libraries and the Academy, 3
S. Harnad, T. Brody (2004)
Comparing the Impact of Open Access (OA) vs. Non-OA Articles in the Same Journals
S. Pinfield, Mike Gardner, J. MacColl (2002)
Setting up an institutional e-print archive
Mike McGrath (2011)
Interlending and document supply: a review of the recent literature: 73Interlending & Document Supply, 39
Ji Kim (2011)
A Study on Faculty`s Adoption of Institutional Repositories(IRs) Based on the Diffusion of Innovations TheoryJournal of The Korean Society for Information Management, 28
M. Pahor, Miha Škerlavaj, Vlado Dimovski (2008)
Evidence for the network perspective on organizational learningJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 59
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the development of institutional repositories in New Zealand, exploring factors affecting the adoption and success of institutional repositories from the perspective of the library managers who established them, and from the perspective of the academic community. Design/methodology/approach – Data from a series of interviews with library managers are compared with the findings from a randomised national survey of academics. Findings – The responses of the library managers suggest that they are positive about the value of their institutional repository, and the progress made towards recruiting content for it. Data from the survey of academics indicate that academics have been slow to embrace the concept of institutional repositories, and show little interest in using repositories for increasing the accessibility of their own work, or to access the work of others. The number of deposits remains low, mirroring patterns throughout the world, and subject or disciplinary repositories appear to have greater value to the academic community. Practical implications – The future long‐term sustainability of institutional repositories depends on gaining a stronger commitment from the academic community, or developing different goals, against which their success might be measured. Originality/value – The study is the first random survey of academic staff across all disciplines, and an entire country, and the findings have a very high level of generalisability.
Performance Measurement and Metrics – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 6, 2010
Keywords: Archiving; Open systems; Academic libraries; New Zealand
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.