Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Weehuizen, Bulat Sanditov, Robin Cowan (2011)
Productivity effects of innovation, stress and social relationsJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 79
Hsi‐An Shih, Ely Susanto (2011)
Is innovative behavior really good for the firm?: Innovative work behavior, conflict with coworkers and turnover intention: moderating roles of perceived distributive fairnessInternational Journal of Conflict Management, 22
Judy Siguaw, P. Simpson, C. Enz (2006)
Conceptualizing Innovation Orientation: A Framework for Study and Integration of Innovation Research*Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23
C. Clegg, Kerrie Unsworth, O. Epitropaki, G. Parker (2002)
Implicating trust in the innovation process
Kerrie Unsworth, C. Clegg (2010)
Why Do Employees Undertake Creative Action?
T. Martin, J. Price, C. Mueller (1981)
Job performance and turnover.Journal of Applied Psychology, 66
G. Adams (1998)
Book Review: Primary Prevention Practices.Martin Bloom. (1996). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Journal of Primary Prevention, 18
J. Eskildsen, A. Westlund, K. Kristensen (2004)
Measuring employee assets - The Nordic Employee IndexBus. Process. Manag. J., 10
Cheng-Feng Cheng, M. Lai, Wann‐Yih Wu (2010)
Exploring the impact of innovation strategy on R&D employees’ job satisfaction: A mathematical model and empirical researchTechnovation, 30
P. Tierney
The influence of cognitive climate on job satisfaction and creative efficacy
R. Kanungo (1979)
The concepts of alienation and involvement revisited.Psychological Bulletin, 86
James Burroughs, D. Dahl, C. Moreau, Amitava Chattopadhyay, G. Gorn (2011)
Facilitating and Rewarding Creativity during New Product DevelopmentJournal of Marketing, 75
Onne Janssen (2000)
Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behaviourJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73
Onne Janssen (2003)
Innovative behaviour and job involvement at the price of conflict and less satisfactory relations with co-workersJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76
R. Baron, D. Kenny (1986)
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of personality and social psychology, 51 6
B. Tabachnick, L. Fidell (2007)
Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed.
H. Shipton, M. West, C. Parkes, J. Dawson, M. Patterson (2006)
When promoting positive feelings pays: Aggregate job satisfaction, work design features, and innovation in manufacturing organizationsEuropean Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15
C. Dobni (2010)
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AN INNOVATION ORIENTATION AND COMPETITIVE STRATEGYInternational Journal of Innovation Management, 14
Claus Langfred (2004)
Too Much of a Good Thing? Negative Effects of High Trust and Individual Autonomy in Self-Managing TeamsAcademy of Management Journal, 47
P. Vermeulen, B. Dankbaar (2002)
The Organisation of Product Innovation in the Financial SectorThe Service Industries Journal, 22
A. Pieterse, D. Knippenberg, M. Schippers, D. Stam (2009)
Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior : The moderating role of psychological empowermentJournal of Organizational Behavior, 31
B.G. Tabachnick, L.S. Fidell
Using Multivariate Statistics
Onne Janssen, N. Yperen (2004)
Employees' goal orientations, the quality of leader-member exchange, and the outcomes of job performance and job satisfactionAcademy of Management Journal, 47
L. Alpkan, Çağri Bulut, G. Gunday, G. Ulusoy, K. Kilic (2010)
Organizational Support for Intrapreneurship and its Interaction with Human Capital To Enhance Innovative PerformanceIRPN: Innovation & Organizational Behavior (Topic)
B.A. Hennessey, T.M. Amabile
Creativity
C. Dombrowski, Jeffrey Kim, K. Desouza, A. Braganza, Sridhar Papagari, P. Baloh, Sanjeev Jha (2007)
Elements of innovative culturesKnowledge and Process Management, 14
Feirong Yuan, R. Woodman (2010)
Innovative Behavior in the Workplace: The Role of Performance and Image Outcome ExpectationsAcademy of Management Journal, 53
C. Ong, David Wan, Seong-Huat Chng (2003)
Factors affecting indivual innovation: an examination within a Japanese subsidiary in SingaporeTechnovation, 23
G. Spreitzer (1995)
PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT IN THE WORKPLACE: DIMENSIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND VALIDATIONAcademy of Management Journal, 38
A. Brief (1998)
Attitudes in and around organizations
Teresa Amabile, Regina Conti, Heather Coon, J. Lazenby, M. Herron (1996)
Assessing the Work Environment for CreativityAcademy of Management Journal, 39
T. Judge, J. Bono (2001)
Relationship of core self-evaluations traits--self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability--with job satisfaction and job performance: a meta-analysis.The Journal of applied psychology, 86 1
L. Gumusluoglu, A. Ilsev (2009)
Transformational Leadership and Organizational Innovation: The Roles of Internal and External Support for InnovationOrganizations & Markets eJournal
Gaylen Chandler, Chalon Keller, D. Lyon (2000)
Unraveling the Determinants and Consequences of an Innovation-Supportive Organizational CultureEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25
E. Miron, M. Erez, E. Naveh (2004)
Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other?Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25
L. Dorenbosch, M. Engen, M. Verhagen (2005)
On-the-Job Innovation: The Impact of Job Design and Human Resource Management Through Production OwnershipIO: Productivity
C. Shalley, L. Gilson, T. Blum (2000)
Matching Creativity Requirements and the Work Environment: Effects on Satisfaction and Intentions to LeaveAcademy of Management Journal, 43
A.M. Grant, J.W. Berry
The necessity of others is the mother of invention: intrinsic and prosocial motivations, perspective taking, and creativity
Jon Sundbo (2002)
The Strategic Management of Innovation
Jean Lee (2008)
Effects of leadership and leader‐member exchange on innovativenessJournal of Managerial Psychology, 23
Onne Janssen (2004)
How fairness perceptions make innovative behavior more or less stressfulJournal of Organizational Behavior, 25
S. Scott, R. Bruce (1994)
DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACEAcademy of Management Journal, 37
Z. Chen, S. Aryee (2007)
Delegation And Employee Work Outcomes: An Examination Of The Cultural Context Of Mediating Processes In ChinaAcademy of Management Journal, 50
Onne Janssen (2001)
Fairness perceptions as a moderator in the curvilinear relationships between job demands, and job performance and job satisfactionAcademy of Management Journal, 44
Mark Davis (2009)
Understanding the relationship between mood and creativity: A meta-analysisOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108
Xiaomeng Zhang, K. Bartol (2010)
Linking Empowering Leadership and Employee Creativity: The Influence of Psychological Empowerment, Intrinsic Motivation, and Creative Process EngagementAcademy of Management Journal, 53
Michael Leippe, Roger Elkin (1987)
When motives clash: Issue involvement and response involvement as determinants of persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52
Purpose – Organizational performance is positively affected by employees’ innovative behaviour, but recent studies indicate that innovative work behaviour may have negative performance consequences. Negative tensions may arise due to employees’ different views on innovation, and efficiency may be reduced because of high job autonomy in innovative job settings. This study aims to examine how job satisfaction and mental involvement via moderation effects increase the effectiveness of innovative work behaviour. Design/methodology/approach – A theoretical model was developed and tested on panel sample data representing 294 employees in a Danish financial company. The response rate on the survey was 93 per cent. The data was analysed via confirmatory factor analysis and hierarchical regression models. Findings – This study shows that job satisfaction and innovative work behaviour can be aligned in environments characterized by innovation trust. Further mental involvement is identified as a component increasing innovative work behaviour in situations without the opportunity for monitoring. Practical implications – From a managerial perspective: the alignment of job satisfaction and innovative behaviour is central, as this joint optimization affects organizational performance positively. Originality/value – This study reports one of a very limited number of studies focusing on the negative effects of innovative work behaviour. This study demonstrates that innovation trust aligns job satisfaction and innovative work behaviour, and further that mental involvement increases the efficiency of job autonomy.
European Journal of Innovation Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 26, 2013
Keywords: Innovative work behaviour; Innovation management; Job satisfaction; Mental involvement and innovation trust; Denmark
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.