Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Eric Olson (2005)
Strategically managing risk in the information age: a holistic approachJournal of Business Strategy, 26
Ron Adner (2006)
Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem.Harvard business review, 84 4
Harvard Business Review, 92
J. Calandro (2015)
A leader’s guide to strategic risk managementStrategy & Leadership, 43
T. Das, Bing-Sheng Teng (1996)
RISK TYPES AND INTER‐FIRM ALLIANCE STRUCTURES*Journal of Management Studies, 33
Brian Hall, Andrew Wasynczuk, John Berisford, Stephen Kaufman (2011)
El "tres" de caballerosHarvard Business Review, 89
C. Zott, R. Amit, Lorenzo Massa (2011)
The Business Model: Recent Developments and Future ResearchJournal of Management, 37
McKinsey Quarterly, 3
A. Osterwalder, Y. Pigneur (2010)
Business Model Generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers and challengersAfrican Journal of Business Management, 5
M. Porter, J. Heppelmann (2014)
How Smart, Connected Products Are Transforming CompetitionHarvard Business Review, 92
R. Katila, Jeff Rosenberger, K. Eisenhardt (2008)
Swimming with Sharks: Technology Ventures, Defense Mechanisms and Corporate RelationshipsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 53
Harvard Business Review, 89
T. Aabo, J. Fraser, B. Simkins (2004)
The Rise and Evolution of the Chief Risk Officer: Enterprise Risk Management at Hydro OneRisk Management eJournal
H. Chesbrough (2007)
Business model innovation: it's not just about technology anymoreStrategy & Leadership, 35
Catherine Tucker, R. Smeets, Lauren Cohen, Umit Gurun, S. Kominers (2014)
The real cost of "patent trolls"Harvard Business Review, 92
PurposePast research demonstrated that novel IT-based business models generate tremendous returns for innovators. However, the risks associated with these innovations remain under-explored. This paper aims to address this critical gap analyzing risks and offering important insights particularly for practitioners.Design/methodology/approachThe authors adopted an exploratory multiple-case study research design. It draws on 22 semi-structured interviews with managers from leading energy utilities, as well as leading providers of virtual power plants technology within the German energy industry.FindingsThe research reveals that main risks in new digital business models in the energy sector are associated with three forms of interdependence between innovation actors: the regulatory, the technological and the collaborative. To deal with these interdependencies, the authors propose an original multi-step risk management framework. This framework considers the outreach as a critical dimension for risk assessment and offers a new risk response matrix to draw individual and collective mitigation activities for specific types of risks.Practical implicationsThis paper offers a framework for the management of interdependence risks that are fundamental for business model innovations based on IT. Thus, it is applicable in companies both inside the energy sector and beyond.Originality/valueThis paper analyzes an important digital business model innovation that has not yet been explored in management literature – the virtual power plant (VPP). It is based on original and current empirical work and proposes a novel risk management framework for business organizations.
Journal of Business Strategy – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 18, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.