Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Innovation practices success in China: the use of innovation mechanisms in Chinese SOEs

Innovation practices success in China: the use of innovation mechanisms in Chinese SOEs Purpose – The climate for technical innovation has been improving in the past few years in China. This paper describes a case research concerning technical innovation practices success in three Chinese state‐owned enterprises (SOEs) in the manufacturing industry. This is executed by applying a technical innovation audit tool based on “Western” good practices. Design/methodology/approach – Studies on technical innovation in the Chinese SOEs started in the 1990s, but most investigations in this field were based on statistical survey and mathematical modelling. In this research, case study research method, including such strategies as open‐ended, in‐depth questions, intensive interviews and observations, are applied for the validity of information. Findings – The data and results reveal that the investigated Chinese SOEs have already some mechanisms for innovation in place. But there is still room for improvement and enhancement with respect to the effect on innovation success. It is also concluded that benchmarking (through the application of the technical innovation audit tool) does guide the Chinese management toward deciding which innovation mechanisms to adopt so as to provide the basics for innovation success. Additionally, based on the case studies the interesting conclusion could be drawn. In the context of the Chinese economy in transition, the case companies with less openness to the market (i.e. with high government involvement) have a more widespread use of innovation mechanisms. Practical implications – The last finding seems to contradict the positive relationship between market focus and innovativeness as suggested in “Western” innovation management theories. For clarification we relate this to the way the SOEs deal with their adaptive cycle, thereby considering their way of dealing with (increased) complexity as compared to “Western” companies (complexity absorption versus reduction). The considered cases are embedded in the institutional setting of China in transition. Therefore, the conclusions and findings enrich the theory of transition by revealing the point that entering an open market abruptly may not be the solution for SOEs, which are rooted in a socialist economy, to become more competitive and more innovative. This was mostly elaborated through the influence of the two main stakeholders (i.e. government and customer/end‐user) on the openness of the SOEs and their use of innovation mechanisms in China, the largest socialist system of the world. Originality/value – This paper is based on a doctoral research project, containing reliable, first hand data from the practice. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Technology Management in China Emerald Publishing

Innovation practices success in China: the use of innovation mechanisms in Chinese SOEs

Download PDF
16 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/innovation-practices-success-in-china-the-use-of-innovation-mechanisms-vcdh4LhIXZ
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1746-8779
DOI
10.1108/17468770610642768
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The climate for technical innovation has been improving in the past few years in China. This paper describes a case research concerning technical innovation practices success in three Chinese state‐owned enterprises (SOEs) in the manufacturing industry. This is executed by applying a technical innovation audit tool based on “Western” good practices. Design/methodology/approach – Studies on technical innovation in the Chinese SOEs started in the 1990s, but most investigations in this field were based on statistical survey and mathematical modelling. In this research, case study research method, including such strategies as open‐ended, in‐depth questions, intensive interviews and observations, are applied for the validity of information. Findings – The data and results reveal that the investigated Chinese SOEs have already some mechanisms for innovation in place. But there is still room for improvement and enhancement with respect to the effect on innovation success. It is also concluded that benchmarking (through the application of the technical innovation audit tool) does guide the Chinese management toward deciding which innovation mechanisms to adopt so as to provide the basics for innovation success. Additionally, based on the case studies the interesting conclusion could be drawn. In the context of the Chinese economy in transition, the case companies with less openness to the market (i.e. with high government involvement) have a more widespread use of innovation mechanisms. Practical implications – The last finding seems to contradict the positive relationship between market focus and innovativeness as suggested in “Western” innovation management theories. For clarification we relate this to the way the SOEs deal with their adaptive cycle, thereby considering their way of dealing with (increased) complexity as compared to “Western” companies (complexity absorption versus reduction). The considered cases are embedded in the institutional setting of China in transition. Therefore, the conclusions and findings enrich the theory of transition by revealing the point that entering an open market abruptly may not be the solution for SOEs, which are rooted in a socialist economy, to become more competitive and more innovative. This was mostly elaborated through the influence of the two main stakeholders (i.e. government and customer/end‐user) on the openness of the SOEs and their use of innovation mechanisms in China, the largest socialist system of the world. Originality/value – This paper is based on a doctoral research project, containing reliable, first hand data from the practice.

Journal

Journal of Technology Management in China – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jan 1, 2006

Keywords: Innovation; Stakeholder analysis; Public sector organizations; China; Case studies

References

  • Organizations as adaptive systems in complex environments: the case of China
    Boisot, M.; Child, J.
  • Manufacturing in the 1990s – productivity, flexibility and innovation
    Bolwijn, P.T.; Kumpe, T.
  • Technology Readings in Management: A Selection from 10 European Doctoral Summer Schools
    Brockhoff, K.K.; Pearson, A.W.; de Weerd‐Nederhof, P.C.; Kerssens‐van Drongelen, I.C.
  • Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation
    Burgelman, R.A.; Maidique, M.A.; Wheelwright, S.C.
  • Development of a technical innovation audit
    Chiesa, V.; Coughlan, P.; Voss, C.
  • Product Development Performance
    Clark, K.; Fujimoto, T.
  • Technological Innovation
    Fu, J.
  • Analysis on Innovation in the Chinese Firms
    Gao, J.
  • China's Industrial Technology, Market Reform and Organizational Change
    Gu, S.
  • Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action
    Jick, T.D.
  • Did socialism fail to innovate? A natural experiment of the two Zeiss companies
    Kogut, B.; Zander, U.
  • Enterprise Innovation
    Liu, Y.
  • The Restructuring of State‐owned Enterprises in Transition
    Liu, W.; Gao, M.
  • Building operations management theory through case and field research
    Meredith, J.
  • Qualitative Data Analysis: A Source of New Methods
    Miles, M.B.; Huberman, A.M.
  • Organizational strategy, structure, and process (1978)
    Miles, R.E.; Snow, C.C.; Meyer, A.D.; Coleman, H.J. Jr
  • Toward a stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts
    Mitchell, R.K.; Agle, B.R.; Wood, D.J.
  • Benchmarking Innovation: a short report
    Radnor, A.; Robinson, J.
  • Management of technical innovation in Chinese state‐owned enterprises: case studies from a stakeholder perspective
    Ren, L.
  • Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change
    Tidd, J.; Bessant, J.; Pavitt, K.
  • Managing Strategic Innovation and Change: A Collection of Readings
    Tushman, M.L.; Anderson, P.C.
  • Case research in operations management
    Voss, C.; Tsikriktsis, N.; Frohlich, M.
  • Some problems and proposals on innovation mechanism of large and medium state‐owned enterprises
    Wang, Q.; Cao, Z.; Zhang, M.
  • Case Study Research: Design and Methods
    Yin, K.