Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Donald Conlon, E. Lind, R. Lissak (1989)
Nonlinear and Nonmonotonic Effects of Outcome on Procedural and Distributive Fairness Judgments1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19
E.Allan Lind, R. Lissak (1985)
Apparent impropriety and procedural fairness judgmentsJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21
Sheldon Alexander, Marian Ruderman (1987)
The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behaviorSocial Justice Research, 1
E. Lind, R. Lissak, Donald Conlon (1983)
Decision Control and Process Control Effects on Procedural Fairness Judgments1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 13
A. Benton, H. Kelley, B. Liebling (1972)
Effects of extremity of offers and concession rate on the outcomes of bargaining.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24
J. Adams (1965)
Inequity In Social ExchangeAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2
J. Brockner, S. Grover, Thomas Reed, Rocki-Lee Dewitt, Michael O'Malley (1987)
Survivors' Reactions to Layoffs: We Get By with a Little Help for Our Friends.Administrative Science Quarterly, 32
E. Lind, R. Kanfer, P. Earley (1990)
Voice, control, and procedural justice : instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgmentsJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59
J. Coleman (1987)
Toward an Integrated Theory of White-Collar CrimeAmerican Journal of Sociology, 93
T. Tyler, K. Rasinski, K. Mcgraw (1985)
The Influence of Perceived Injustice on the Endorsement of Political Leaders1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15
Jerald Greenberg (1987)
A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice TheoriesAcademy of Management Review, 12
Rekha Karambayya, J. Brett (1989)
Managers Handling Disputes: Third-Party Roles and Perceptions of FairnessAcademy of Management Journal, 32
M. Rowe (1987)
The corporate ombudsman: An overview and analysisNegotiation Journal, 3
T. Tyler, Andrew Caine (1981)
The influence of outcomes and procedures on satisfaction with formal leaders.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41
T. Kochan, T. Jick (1978)
The Public Sector Mediation ProcessJournal of Conflict Resolution, 22
C. Donn (1977)
Games Final-Offer Arbitrators Might PlayIndustrial Relations, 16
T. Tyler, K. Rasinski, Nancy Spodick (1985)
Influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48
Blair Sheppard, R. Lewicki (1987)
Toward general principles of managerial fairnessSocial Justice Research, 1
R. Folger, M. Konovsky (1989)
Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise DecisionsAcademy of Management Journal, 32
Donald Conlon, Peter Fasolo (1990)
Influence of Speed of Third-Party Intervention and Outcome on Negotiator and Constituent Fairness JudgmentsAcademy of Management Journal, 33
Jerald Greenberg (1990)
Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and TomorrowJournal of Management, 16
P. Carnevale, Donald Conlon (1988)
Time pressure and strategic choice in mediationOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42
In a simulated organizational conflict, concession behavior by a negotiator's opponent was manipulated to examine how subsequent third party intervention would influence negotiator perceptions of process control, decision control, distributive justice, and the third party. Negotiators whose opponents made large concessions reciprocated by also making large concessions, suggesting a high level of movement toward agreement by the disputants subjects whose opponents made few concessions reciprocated in kind, resulting in little movement toward agreement. Third parties, however, imposed outcomes on all negotiators prior to negotiated agreements. Perceptions of decision control, distributive justice, and the necessity of third party intervention were influenced by whether disputants were close to reaching an agreement on their own or not. Outcome imposed by the third party influenced almost all measures. The study suggests that behavior by the disputants in the form of movement toward agreement, and not just behavior by the third party, can influence ratings of both procedures and outcomes.
International Journal of Conflict Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 1, 1992
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.