Independent feedback on clinical audit performance: a multi‐professional pilot study

Independent feedback on clinical audit performance: a multi‐professional pilot study Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the acceptability and educational impact of independent feedback on the clinical audit performance of different groups of healthcare professionals by trained colleagues. Design/methodology/approach – This is a pilot study involving review of the criterion audit and significant event analysis (SEA) attempts of west of Scotland dentists, pharmacists, physiotherapists, practice managers and nurse practitioners by trained colleagues using validated instruments. Audit, SEA and feedback reports were content‐analysed. Data on pre‐ and post‐study attitudes, experiences and knowledge levels were collected by questionnaire. T ‐tests for differences in mean group scores were calculated, along with 95 per cent confidence intervals for mean differences. A difference in mean scores of 1.0 or greater would be indicative of educational gain. Findings – A total of 34 participants submitted 54 audit and SEA reports, with 20 submitting both (58.9 per cent). In total, 14/20 audits (75.0 per cent) and 26/34 SEAs (76.5 per cent) contained evidence of appropriate learning needs and action(s) implemented for healthcare improvement. Feedback focused on knowledge and skills in applying audit methods; demonstrating insight into deficiencies; highlighting appropriate learning needs; and implementing change. Audit knowledge and skill scores increased by a mean difference of ≥1.0 for most stages of audit and SEA method ( p <0.001). Strong agreement on the value of independent feedback on clinical audit was reported. Research limitations/implications – The study highlights some of the difficulties in applying audit methods across professions and highlights the added value of feedback by trained colleagues, but is limited in size. Practical implications – Integrating clinical audit and peer feedback with continuing professional development obligations may facilitate greater engagement and more effective quality improvement, but will require a policy change and additional resource. Originality/value – This small study provides further evidence of the acceptability and educational impact of independent feedback on clinical audit performance for healthcare professionals. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Clinical Governance: An International Journal Emerald Publishing

Independent feedback on clinical audit performance: a multi‐professional pilot study

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/independent-feedback-on-clinical-audit-performance-a-multi-8QA0FDFtKN
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1477-7274
DOI
10.1108/14777270910976148
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate the acceptability and educational impact of independent feedback on the clinical audit performance of different groups of healthcare professionals by trained colleagues. Design/methodology/approach – This is a pilot study involving review of the criterion audit and significant event analysis (SEA) attempts of west of Scotland dentists, pharmacists, physiotherapists, practice managers and nurse practitioners by trained colleagues using validated instruments. Audit, SEA and feedback reports were content‐analysed. Data on pre‐ and post‐study attitudes, experiences and knowledge levels were collected by questionnaire. T ‐tests for differences in mean group scores were calculated, along with 95 per cent confidence intervals for mean differences. A difference in mean scores of 1.0 or greater would be indicative of educational gain. Findings – A total of 34 participants submitted 54 audit and SEA reports, with 20 submitting both (58.9 per cent). In total, 14/20 audits (75.0 per cent) and 26/34 SEAs (76.5 per cent) contained evidence of appropriate learning needs and action(s) implemented for healthcare improvement. Feedback focused on knowledge and skills in applying audit methods; demonstrating insight into deficiencies; highlighting appropriate learning needs; and implementing change. Audit knowledge and skill scores increased by a mean difference of ≥1.0 for most stages of audit and SEA method ( p <0.001). Strong agreement on the value of independent feedback on clinical audit was reported. Research limitations/implications – The study highlights some of the difficulties in applying audit methods across professions and highlights the added value of feedback by trained colleagues, but is limited in size. Practical implications – Integrating clinical audit and peer feedback with continuing professional development obligations may facilitate greater engagement and more effective quality improvement, but will require a policy change and additional resource. Originality/value – This small study provides further evidence of the acceptability and educational impact of independent feedback on clinical audit performance for healthcare professionals.

Journal

Clinical Governance: An International JournalEmerald Publishing

Published: Aug 7, 2009

Keywords: Clinical audit; Peer review; Feedback; Quality improvement

References

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Elsevier, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month

PDF Discount

20% off