Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Rafael Porta, Florencio López‐de‐Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, Robert Vishny (1996)
Law and FinanceJournal of Political Economy, 106
L. Bebchuk, J. Fried (2003)
Executive Compensation as an Agency ProblemCorporate Law: Corporate & Takeover Law eJournal
Danny Miller, J. Block, Peter Jaskiewicz (2010)
Frugal Principals, Lavish Agents: CEO Compensation in Family-, Founder- and Other Firms
P. Strebel (2004)
The Case for Contingent GovernanceMIT Sloan Management Review, 45
H. Hau, M. Thum (2009)
Subprime Crisis and Board (In-)Competence: Private vs. Public Banks in GermanyCorporate Law: Corporate Governance Law
Steen Thomsen, Caspar Rose (2004)
Foundation Ownership and Financial Performance: Do Companies Need Owners?European Journal of Law and Economics, 18
Ronald Anderson, D. Reeb (2003)
Founding-Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500Journal of Finance, 58
M. Schrage
Boards of prevention
L. Bebchuk, A. Cohen
Cost of entrenched boards
P. Strebel, A. Hu
Risk management at the top
Larry Fauver, Michael Fuerst (2004)
Does Good Corporate Governance Include Employee Representation? Evidence from German Corporate BoardsEuropean Public Law: National eJournal
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to show how boards can get in touch with their value critical stakeholders, those who can make or break the company. Design/methodology/approach – The paper first develops the hypothesis that boards often are out of touch with reality. It then introduces the concept of value critical stakeholders and proposes that boards introduce an outreach program to get in touch with them. For each of the proposed five elements in an outreach program, the paper reviews what boards already are doing to be in touch. Findings – The review of existing practice shows that for each of the elements in an outreach program, there is enough practice available for boards to develop a comprehensive approach to get in touch with the value critical stakeholders. Social implications – To prevent a future governance crisis, get in touch and promote long‐term value creation, boards need an explicit program of reaching out beyond the boardroom, not only to the immediate stakeholders, but also the societal stakeholders, who can make or break the company. This paper shows how it can be done. Originality/value – The paper introduces the new concept of value critical stakeholders and describes how it can be used to help boards get in touch with reality.
Corporate Governance – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 18, 2011
Keywords: Corporate governance; Boards; In‐touch; Reality; Stakeholders; Stakeholder analysis; Company performance
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.