Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Stephen Strauss (2010)
Biotech breeding goes bovineNature Biotechnology, 28
Rosa Caiazza, T. Volpe, D. Audretsch (2014)
Innovation in agro-food chainJournal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in The Global Economy, 8
Murat Işık (2004)
Incentives for Technology Adoption Under Environmental Policy Uncertainty: Implications for Green Payment ProgramsEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 27
David Sunding, D. Zilberman (1999)
The agricultural innovation process: Research and technology adoption in a changing agricultural sectorHandbook of Agricultural Economics, 1
Általános tudományok (2010)
Diffusion of Innovations
Paul Stoneman, P. Diederen (1994)
Technology Diffusion and Public PolicyThe Economic Journal, 104
K. Beauchemin, H. Janzen, Shannan Little, T. McAllister, S. McGinn (2010)
Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from beef production in western Canada: A case studyAgricultural Systems, 103
M. Fishbein, I. Ajzen (1977)
Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and ResearchContemporary Sociology, 6
A. Kessler (2014)
Social Contexts of Environmental Practices: How Sustainable Development Discourses and Trust Mediate the Use of Genomics in the Alberta Beef Industry
Z. Griliches (1957)
HYBRID CORN: AN EXPLORATION IN THE ECONOMIC OF TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGEEconometrica, 25
Jared Bullinger, E. DeVuyst, M. Bauer, P. Berg, D. Larson (2006)
An Economic Analysis Of Genetic Information: Leptin Genotyping In Fed CattleAgribusiness & Applied Economics Report
Rosa Caiazza (2016)
A cross-national analysis of policies affecting innovation diffusionThe Journal of Technology Transfer, 41
D. Spielman, Patrick Ward, D. Kolady, H. Ar-Rashid (2017)
Public Incentives, Private Investment, and Outlooks for Hybrid Rice in Bangladesh and IndiaApplied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 39
Kristen Johnson, D. Johnson, D. Johnson (1995)
Methane emissions from cattle.Journal of animal science, 73 8
Jared Carlberg, W. Brown (2001)
An Economic Analysis of Cow-calf Retained Ownership Strategies
A. Alford, R. Hegarty, P. Parnell, O. Cacho, R. Herd, G. Griffith (2006)
The impact of breeding to reduce residual feed intake on enteric methane emissions from the Australian beef industryAustralian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 46
C. Bishop, C. Shumway, P. Wandschneider (2010)
Agent Heterogeneity in Adoption of Anaerobic Digestion Technology: Integrating Economic, Diffusion, and Behavioral Innovation TheoriesLand Economics, 86
Bronwyn Hall (2004)
Innovation and DiffusionERN: Innovation (Topic)
S. Myers, D. Faulkner, F. Ireland, L. Berger, D. Parrett (1999)
Production systems comparing early weaning to normal weaning with or without creep feeding for beef steers.Journal of animal science, 77 2
A. Adrian, S. Norwood, P. Mask (2005)
Producers' perceptions and attitudes toward precision agriculture technologiesComputers and Electronics in Agriculture, 48
E. Okine, J. Basarab, L. Goonewardene, P. Mir (2004)
Residual Feed Intake and Feed Efficiency: Differences and Implications
Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to evaluate cow-calf producer incentive to adopt innovations in traits with important environmental and economic implications for the beef supply chain. Design/methodology/approach– A whole farm multi-year farm optimization model that tracks changes in discounted net returns and methane emissions from the use of newer DNA-related technologies to breed for feed efficient cattle is developed. The analysis is situated within the context of whole beef cattle supply chain. This allows for the derivation of the entire value and environmental impact of the innovation, and the decomposition of value by different participants. The impact of different policies that can stimulate producer uptake and the diffusion of the innovation is also addressed. Findings– The results of the study showed that whilst the use of the breeding technology yielded positive economic and environmental benefits to all producers in the supply chain, primary adopters were unlikely to adopt. This paper finds evidence of the misalignment in incentives within the supply chain with a significant proportion of the additional value going to producers who do not incur any additional cost from the adoption of the innovation. The study also highlighted the role of both public and market-based mechanisms in the innovation diffusion process. Originality/value– This paper is unique as it is the first study that addresses producer incentive to adopt genomic selection for feed efficiency across the entire beef cattle supply chain, and incorporates both economic and environmental outcomes.
British Food Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 6, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.