Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Bates, N. Spell, D. Cullen, E. Burdick, N. Laird, L. Petersen, S. Small, B. Sweitzer, L. Leape (1997)
The costs of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Adverse Drug Events Prevention Study GroupJAMA, 277
D. Bates, N. Spell, D. Cullen, E. Burdick, N. Laird, L. Petersen, S. Small, B. Sweitzer, L. Leape (1997)
The Costs of Adverse Drug Events in Hospitalized PatientsJAMA, 277
Evans Rs, Pestotnik Sl, D. Classen, T. Clemmer, L. Weaver, J. Orme, J. Lloyd, J. Burke (1998)
A computer-assisted management program for antibiotics and other antiinfective agents.The New England journal of medicine, 338 4
Alan Hobbs (2003)
Managing Maintenance Error: A Practical Guide
J. Laporte, F. Latorre, D. Gadgil, D. Chandrasekhar, A. László, G. Rétsági, L. Alfredsson, C. Martínez, D. Kaufman, T. Anderson, J. Kelly, S. Shapiro (1998)
An Epidemiologic Study of Severe Anaphylactic and Anaphylactoid Reactions among Hospital Patients: Methods and Overall Risks The International Collaborative Study of Severe AnaphylaxisEpidemiology, 9
D. Classen, S. Pestotnik, R. Evans, J. Lloyd, J. Burke (1997)
Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients. Excess length of stay, extra costs, and attributable mortality.JAMA, 277 4
L. Leape, D. Bates, D. Cullen, J. Cooper, H. Demonaco, T. Gallivan, R. Hallisey, J. Ives, N. Laird, G. Laffel (1995)
Systems analysis of adverse drug events. ADE Prevention Study Group.JAMA, 274 1
M. Fertleman, N. Barnett, T. Patel (2005)
Improving medication management for patients: the effect of a pharmacist on post-admission ward roundsQuality and Safety in Health Care, 14
The International Collaborative Study of Severe Anaphylaxis
An epidemiologic study of severe anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions among hospital patients: methods and overall risks
D. Bates, L. Leape, D. Cullen, N. Laird, L. Petersen, J. Teich, E. Burdick, M. Hickey, S. Kleefield, B. Shea, M. Vliet, D. Seger (1998)
Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors.JAMA, 280 15
Evans Rs, Pestotnik Sl, D. Classen, S. Horn, Bass Sb, J. Burke (1994)
Preventing Adverse Drug Events in Hospitalized PatientsAnnals of Pharmacotherapy, 28
C. Geibig, J. Mansur, P. Medema, E. Nold (1991)
Pharmacy-controlled documentation of drug allergies.American journal of hospital pharmacy, 48 2
Poul Lenler-Petersen, Dorthe Hansen, Morten Andersen, Henrik Sørensen, Hedda Bille (1995)
Drug-related fatal anaphylactic shock in Denmark 1968-1990. A study based on notifications to the Committee on Adverse Drug Reactions.Journal of clinical epidemiology, 48 9
G. Foreshaw
A career as … an A&E department pharmacist
B. Thong, K. Leong, Chwee-Ying Tang, H. Chng (2003)
Drug allergy in a general hospital: Results of a novel prospective inpatient reporting system.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 90 3
D. Bates, J. Teich, Joshua Lee, D. Seger, G. Kuperman, N. Ma'Luf, D. Boyle, L. Leape (1999)
The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 6 4
N. Dickey, M. Hatlie (1996)
Systems analysis of adverse drug events.JAMA, 275 1
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to audit the use of three strategies for protecting hospital inpatients with allergies: red allergy wristbands for patients with allergies; white identification wristbands for all patients; and completion of an “allergy box” on drug charts. The paper also aims to assess the impact of making pharmacists responsible for ensuring allergy box completion. Design/methodology/approach – The setting was The Whittington Hospital, London, a district general hospital. Two cross‐sectional studies were conducted 11 months apart, before and after pharmacists were made responsible for ensuring allergy box completion. The studies involved 186 (pre‐intervention) and 250 (post‐intervention) unselected adult patients. Findings – The proportion of blank allergy boxes decreased significantly from 24.7 per cent to 5.2 per cent ( p <0.001) when pharmacists were made responsible for ensuring allergy box completion. The most common reason for blank allergy boxes in both studies was that doctors sought and documented allergies in the notes but then forgot to complete the allergy box. Although the proportion of patients lacking allergy wristbands was less in the second study compared with the first (30.4 v. 44.8 per cent, respectively), the difference was not significant ( p =0.206). Similarly, the second study showed a non‐significant decrease in the proportion of patients lacking identification wristbands from 12.9 per cent to 10.8 per cent ( p =0.499). Practical implications – A formal checking system is required for allergy and identification wristbands to improve use of these basic, inexpensive measures for preventing drug errors. Originality/value – The paper shows that making pharmacists responsible for ensuring allergy status documentation on drug charts significantly increased use of this safety measure.
Clinical Governance An International Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Apr 25, 2008
Keywords: Patients; Auditing; Governance; Quality; Risk management; Safety
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.