Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Improving professional service operations: action research in a law firm

Improving professional service operations: action research in a law firm The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how action research-based interventions can effect change in a complex and challenging professional service environment (Lewis and Brown, 2012). This paper presents a successful way to do this. First, by eliciting factors for change driven by deregulation in the United Kingdom’s (UK) legal service sector (Falconer, 2005). Second, by designing and implementing context-sensitive change in a selected legal service firm.Design/methodology/approachThis research adopts a participatory action research methodology involving the use of systems thinking (namely the PrOH modelling methodology) to design suitable interventions and catalyse change.FindingsThis study has generated new knowledge on three fronts–to the legal service operations, to methodology and to the intellectual framework used for abductive reasoning (Checkland and Poulter, 2006). Lessons are transferable to wider professional service operations research. Findings indicate, despite traditional challenges of delivering typical professional services, there is potential for rationalising processes and service delivery commodification, mainly in the low volume, high variety legal service typology (Silvestro et al., 1992).Research limitations/implicationsThis research uses data from an in-depth study of a single organisation.Practical implicationsThis research helped legal service professionals to improve overall efficiency and effectiveness and create new management tools.Social implicationsThis research could help improve legal service operations and make them more accessible.Originality/valueThis research applies a novel, systems thinking based methodology for the first time in a complex professional service operations environment leading to three-fold contributions in the areas of practice, theory and methodology. The paper uses a change management framework (the Change Kaleidoscope), a soft systems methodology (PrOH modelling) and applies these to legal services. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Operations & Production Management Emerald Publishing

Improving professional service operations: action research in a law firm

Download PDF
25 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/improving-professional-service-operations-action-research-in-a-law-RFCRhYFcc6
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
0144-3577
DOI
10.1108/ijopm-10-2020-0696
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how action research-based interventions can effect change in a complex and challenging professional service environment (Lewis and Brown, 2012). This paper presents a successful way to do this. First, by eliciting factors for change driven by deregulation in the United Kingdom’s (UK) legal service sector (Falconer, 2005). Second, by designing and implementing context-sensitive change in a selected legal service firm.Design/methodology/approachThis research adopts a participatory action research methodology involving the use of systems thinking (namely the PrOH modelling methodology) to design suitable interventions and catalyse change.FindingsThis study has generated new knowledge on three fronts–to the legal service operations, to methodology and to the intellectual framework used for abductive reasoning (Checkland and Poulter, 2006). Lessons are transferable to wider professional service operations research. Findings indicate, despite traditional challenges of delivering typical professional services, there is potential for rationalising processes and service delivery commodification, mainly in the low volume, high variety legal service typology (Silvestro et al., 1992).Research limitations/implicationsThis research uses data from an in-depth study of a single organisation.Practical implicationsThis research helped legal service professionals to improve overall efficiency and effectiveness and create new management tools.Social implicationsThis research could help improve legal service operations and make them more accessible.Originality/valueThis research applies a novel, systems thinking based methodology for the first time in a complex professional service operations environment leading to three-fold contributions in the areas of practice, theory and methodology. The paper uses a change management framework (the Change Kaleidoscope), a soft systems methodology (PrOH modelling) and applies these to legal services.

Journal

International Journal of Operations & Production Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: Aug 19, 2021

Keywords: Professional service firms; Soft systems methodology; Action research; Change management; Professional service operations management; Legal service

References

  • Why few organizations adopt systems thinking
    Ackoff, R.L.
  • Interfaces of control. Technocratic and socio-ideological control in a global management consultancy firm
    Alvesson, M.; Karreman, D.
  • What is good action research?: Why the resurgent interest?
    Bradbury-Huang, H.
  • Editorial: intervention‐based research (IBR)—what, where, and how to use it in operations management
    Chandrasekaran, A.; Treville, S.; Browning, T.
  • Where does the customer fit in a service operation?
    Chase, R.B.
  • The customer contact model for organization design
    Chase, R.B.; Tansik, D.A.
  • Consulting on the cusp of disruption
    Christensen, C.M.; Wang, D.; van Bever, D.
  • Building a holarchy using business process orientated holonic (PrOH) modeling
    Clegg, B.T.
  • Using process-oriented holonic (PrOH) modelling to increase understanding of information systems
    Clegg, B.; Shaw, D.
  • Changing professional service archetypes in a law firm using Process Orientated Holonic (PrOH) Modelling
    Clegg, B.T.; Balthu, K.C.; Morris, G.
  • Creating action research quality in organization development: rigorous, reflective and relevant
    Coghlan, D.; Shani, A.
  • Sedimentation and transformation in organizational change: the case of Canadian law firms
    Cooper, D.J.; Hinings, B.; Greenwood, R.; Brown, J.
  • Action research for operations management
    Coughlan, P.; Coghlan, D.
  • Action research for management research
    Eden, C.; Huxham, C.
  • Points of law: unbundling corporate legal services to unlock value
    Ertel, D.; Gordon, M.
  • Fee earner vs fee burner: internal divides in law firms
    Forstenlechner, I.; Lettice, F.; Tschida, M.
  • The design and delivery of modular legal services: implications for supply chain strategy
    Giannakis, M.; Doran, D.; Mee, D.; Papadopoulos, T.; Dubey, R.
  • Influence factors for operational control and compensation in professional service firms
    Goodale, J.C.; Kuratko, D.F.; Hornsby, J.S.
  • Editorial for journal of operations management special issue on professional service operations management (PSOM)
    Harvey, J.; Heineke, J.; Lewis, M.
  • Link manufacturing process and product life cycles
    Hayes, R.H.; Wheelwright, S.C.
  • The dynamics of process-product life cycles
    Hayes, R.B.; Wheelwright, S.C.
  • Action research as narrative: five principles for validation
    Heikkinen, H.L.T.; Huttunen, R.; Syrjala, L.
  • Devising context sensitive approaches to change: the example of glaxo wellcome
    Hope-Hailey, V.; Balogun, J.
  • Unraveling the practices of ‘productization’ in professional service firms
    Jaakkola, E.
  • Creative holism: a critical systems approach to complex problem situations
    Jackson, M.C.
  • How different is professional service operations management
    Lewis, M.; Brown, A.
  • When professionals have to manage
    Lorsch, J.W.; Mathias, P.F.
  • Organizing innovation: complementarities between cross-functional teams
    Love, J.H.; Roper, S.
  • Service operations management research
    Machuca, J.; Gonzalez-Zamora, M.d.M.; Aguilar-Escobar, V.G.
  • Footnotes to organizational change
    March, J.G.
  • What is a professional services firm? Towards a theory and classification
    Nordenflycht, A.V.
  • Intervention as a research strategy
    Oliva, R.
  • Toward a more rigorous, reflective, and relevant science of collaborative management research
    Pasmore, W.; Woodman, R.; Simmons, A.
  • Archetype change in professional organizations: survey evidence from large law firms
    Pinnington, A.; Morris, T.
  • Workplace innovation for better jobs and performance
    Pot, F.
  • Choice and quality in action research practice
    Reason, P.
  • Visualizing service operations
    Sampson, S.E.
  • A strategic framework for task automation in professional services
    Sampson, S.
  • How can service businesses survive and prosper?
    Schmenner, R.W.
  • Service businesses and productivity
    Schmenner, R.W.
  • Problem structuring methods for large group interventions
    Shaw, D.; Westcombe, M.; Hodgkin, J.; Montibeller, G.
  • Institutional change in large law firms: a resource dependency and institutional perspective
    Sherer, P.; Lee, K.
  • Designing services that deliver
    Shostack, G.L.
  • Towards a classification of service processes
    Silvestro, R.; Fitzgerald, L.; Johnston, R.; Voss, C.
  • We're changing-or are we? Untangling the role of progressive, regressive, and stability narratives during strategic change implementation
    Sonenshein, S.
  • An assessment of the scientific merits of action research
    Susman, G.L.; Evered, R.D.
  • Faster, shorter, cheaper may be simple: it's never easy
    Weisbord, M.; Janoff, S.
  • Action research: a new paradigm for research in production and operations management
    Westbrook, R.
  • What is reflection-in-action? A phenomenological account
    Yanow, D.; Tsoukas, H.