Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Eleanor Loiacono-Mello, Soussan Djamasbi (2013)
Corporate website accessibility: does legislation matter?Universal Access in the Information Society, 12
Justin Brown, Vivienne Conway (2012)
Web Accessibility in Corporate Australia: Perceptions versus Reality
David Comeaux, Axel Schmetzke (2013)
Accessibility of academic library web sites in North America - current status and trends (2002-2012)Libr. Hi Tech, 31
Vicki Hanson, J. Richards (2013)
Progress on Website Accessibility?ACM Trans. Web, 7
Kristina Southwell, Jacquelyn Slater (2012)
Accessibility of Digital Special Collections Using Screen ReadersLibr. Hi Tech, 30
Serhat Kurt (2011)
The accessibility of university web sites: the case of Turkish universitiesUniversal Access in the Information Society, 10
Vivienne Conway (2011)
Website accessibility in Western Australian public librariesThe Australian Library Journal, 60
Vivienne Conway, Justin Brown, S. Hollier, C. Nicholl (2012)
Website Accessibility: a Comparative Analysis of Australian National and State/Territory Library WebsitesThe Australian Library Journal, 61
R. Gonçalves, J. Martins, Jorge Pereira, M. Oliveira, J. Ferreira (2012)
Accessibility levels of Portuguese enterprise websites: equal opportunities for all?Behaviour & Information Technology, 31
Camilla Fulton (2011)
Web Accessibility, Libraries, and the LawInformation Technology and Libraries, 30
Purpose– The purpose of this paper is to explain how Edith Cowan University (ECU) Library improved the accessibility of their web site, aiming for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) version 2.0 Level AA. It describes the results obtained. Design/methodology/approach– Initial testing by consultants was conducted in October 2012. The web site was defined as all webpages which appear part of the library web site, including supplier webpages, plus pages from the university web site and library web site. Library staff applied the recommendations to pages which they could edit, and discussed the recommendations with suppliers to improve their product's accessibility. The web site was re-tested in June 2013. Findings– ECU Library web site failed WCAG 2.0 Level A standard in the initial testing and re-testing. Many individual pages which failed initially passed the re-test. The smallest improvement was seen in suppliers’ web sites. Practical implications– This paper could help libraries to improve web site accessibility, as it covers negotiating with suppliers to upgrade their web sites, plus upgrading editable webpages. It shows initial and re-test results, allowing libraries to compare their results to those of ECU. Legislation and guidelines state web sites should be accessible to all users and organisations providing non-accessible web sites risk being sued. Social implications– A web site not complying with WCAG version 2.0 would be very difficult for people with disabilities to access. Upgrading ECU Library's web site will provide all users with more equal access to the resources. Originality/value– This study describes problems in upgrading academic library webpages and related supplier web sites and organisation web site to improve accessibility for people with disabilities.
Library Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Nov 10, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.