Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Argyris (1994)
Initiating Change That PerseveresAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 40
E. Foldy (2004)
Learning from Diversity: A Theoretical ExplorationPublic Administration Review, 64
J. Creswell (1966)
Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches
L. Lahey, E. Souvaine, R. Kegan
A Guide to the Subject‐Object Interview: Its Administration, and Analysis
C. Argyris (1994)
Good communication that blocks learningHarvard Business Review, 72
A. Atwood
Review: how we get stuck, and how we get unstuck: a review and muse
R. Kegan, L. Lahey
The real reason people won't change
W. Torbert
Generating simultaneous personal, team, and organization development
J. Creswell (1998)
Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions.
J. Grieves (2008)
Why we should abandon the idea of the learning organizationThe Learning Organization, 15
Will Noonan (2007)
Discussing the Undiscussable: A Guide to Overcoming Defensive Routines in the Workplace
C. Argyris (1976)
Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making.Administrative Science Quarterly, 21
C. Argyris (1996)
Double Loop Learning in Organizations
Jill Mordaunt (2006)
The Emperor's New Clothes: Why Boards and Managers Find Accountability Relationships DifficultPublic Policy and Administration, 21
P. Senge
The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization (updated)
P. Senge (2003)
Taking personal change seriously: The impact of Organizational Learning on management practiceAcademy of Management Perspectives, 17
A. Edmondson
The competitive imperative of learning
Myeong-gu Seo (2003)
Overcoming Emotional Barriers, Political Obstacles, and Control Imperatives in the Action- Science Approach to Individual and Organizational LearningAcademy of Management Learning and Education, 2
Victor Woodell (2003)
An Interview with Chris ArgrisOrganization Development Journal, 21
C. Curado (2006)
Organisational Learning and Organisational Design.The Learning Organization, 13
R. Schwarz (2003)
Becoming a Facilitative Leader.Training & Development, 57
J. Raelin (1997)
Action Learning and Action Science: Are They Different?IO: Productivity
A. Edmondson (1996)
Three Faces of Eden: The Persistence of Competing Theories and Multiple Diagnoses in Organizational Intervention ResearchHuman Relations, 49
C. Argyris, Donald Schön (1976)
Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional EffectivenessThe Journal of Higher Education, 47
R. Torraco (2005)
Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and ExamplesHuman Resource Development Review, 4
D. Rooke, W. Torbert (1998)
Organizational transformation as a function of CEOs' developmental stageOrganization Development Journal, 16
G. Pisano, R. Hayes (1994)
Beyond World-Class : The New Manufacturing StrategyHarvard Business Review, 72
G. Henderson (2002)
Transformative Learning as a Condition for Transformational Change in OrganizationsHuman Resource Development Review, 1
D. Garvin, A. Edmondson, F. Gino (2008)
Is yours a learning organization?Harvard business review, 86 3
T. Rocco, Maria Plakhotnik (2009)
Literature Reviews, Conceptual Frameworks, and Theoretical Frameworks: Terms, Functions, and DistinctionsHuman Resource Development Review, 8
P. Senge (1991)
The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge
C. Argyris (2002)
Teaching Smart People How to LearnReflections: The Sol Journal, 4
D. Sparks
Inner conflicts, inner strengths: an interview with Robert Kegan and Lisa Lahey
C. Argyris (2000)
Flawed Advice and the Management Trap: How Managers Can Know When They're Getting Good Advice and When They're Not
R. Schwarz
The facilitator and other facilitative roles
R. Schwarz (1994)
The Skilled Facilitator: A Comprehensive Resource for Consultants, Facilitators, Managers, Trainers, and Coaches
R. Kegan (2009)
The Evolving Self: Problem and Process in Human Development
R. Kegan (2009)
What “form” transforms? A constructive-developmental approach to transformative learning
K. Lewin (1951)
Field theory in social science
C. Argyris, D. Schön
Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, Practice
R. Kegan, L. Lahey
The Way We Talk Can Change the Way We Work: Seven Languages for Transformation
R. Kegan (1982)
The Evolving Self
R. Kegan, L. Lahey (2009)
Immunity to Change: How to Overcome It and Unlock Potential in Yourself and Your Organization
D. Rooke, W. Torbert (2005)
Seven transformations of leadershipHarvard Business Review, 83
C. Argyris (1993)
Education for leading-learningOrganizational Dynamics, 21
E. Foldy, P. Rivard, Tamara Buckley (2009)
Power, Safety, and Learning in Racially Diverse GroupsAcademy of Management Learning and Education, 8
D. Blackman, J. Connelly, Steven Henderson (2004)
Does Double Loop Learning Create Reliable Knowledge?
Peter Smith (2008)
The Learning Organization turns 15: a retrospectiveThe Learning Organization, 15
K. Eriksen (2006)
The Constructive Developmental Theory of Robert KeganThe Family Journal, 14
R. Schwarz (2005)
The Skilled Facilitator Fieldbook: Tips, Tools, and Tested Methods for Consultants, Facilitators, Managers, Trainers, and Coaches
R. Lipshitz (2000)
Chic, Mystique, and MisconceptionThe Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36
K. Thomas, Stephen Allen (2006)
The Learning Organisation: A Meta-Analysis of Themes in Literature.The Learning Organization, 13
George Shaw
Man and Superman
R. Bokeno (2003)
The work of Chris Argyris as critical organization practiceJournal of Organizational Change Management, 16
G. Hamel, L. Välikangas (2003)
The quest for resilience.Harvard business review, 81 9
R. Schwarz (2006)
Does your leadership reduce learningLeader To Leader, 2006
R. Kegan (1994)
In Over Our Heads: The Mental Demands of Modern Life
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine and synthesize Argyris and Schön's Theory of Action and Kegan and Lahey's theory of Immunity to Change in order to produce an integrated model. Design/methodology/approach – Literature discussing Argyris and Schön's Theory of Action (Model I and Model II), single and double‐loop learning, espoused theory and theory‐in‐use; and Kegan and Lahey's theory of Immunity to Change was examined. The two theories were then summarized, analyzed, compared and synthesized into an integrated model. Findings – Within Kegan and Lahey's model of an immunity system, the Argyris and Schön Model I Unilateral Control Model should be considered a competing commitment. Kegan and Lahey's theory identifies a critical causal element (underlying assumption) not previously identified by the Argyris and Schön Theory of Action, thus opening the potential for expanded effectiveness by practioners of Argyris and Schön's theory. Originality/value – Little attention has been given in the literature to comparing or integrating these two theories. The synthesis of the two theories opens the possibility of overcoming limitations experienced by practitioners promoting double‐loop learning in organizations.
The Learning Organization – Emerald Publishing
Published: May 25, 2010
Keywords: Organizations; Learning; Organizational theory; Change management
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.