Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Flynn, R. Goldsmith (1993)
Identifying Innovators in Consumer Service MarketsService Industries Journal, 13
Banwari Mittal, Myung-Soo Lee (1989)
A causal model of consumer involvementJournal of Economic Psychology, 10
F. D'hauteville, R. Goldsmith (1998)
Measuring Cross Cultural Acceptance of an Innovation: The Case of Low-Alcohol Wine
R. Goldsmith (1998)
Some Characteristics of Wine InnovatorsInternational Journal of Wine Marketing, 10
L. Flynn, R. Goldsmith (1993)
A Validation of the Goldsmith and Hofacker Innovativeness ScaleEducational and Psychological Measurement, 53
R. Curtis, E. Jackson (1962)
Multiple Indicators in Survey ResearchAmerican Journal of Sociology, 68
R. Goldsmith, L. Flynn (1992)
Identifying Innovators in Consumer Product MarketsEuropean Journal of Marketing, 26
L. Flynn, R. Goldsmith (1999)
A Short, Reliable Measure of Subjective KnowledgeJournal of Business Research, 46
L. Flynn, R. Goldsmith, J. Eastman (1996)
Opinion leaders and opinion seekers: Two new measurement scalesJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24
M. Uysal, B. Mihalik (1996)
Response To Comments Concerning "a Comparison of Information Sources Used By Vacationing Germans and Japanese"Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 20
J. Hattie, R. Cooksey (1984)
Procedures for Assessing the Validities of Tests Using the "Known-Groups" MethodApplied Psychological Measurement, 8
R. Goldsmith, F. D'hauteville (1998)
Heavy wine consumption: empirical and theoretical perspectivesBritish Food Journal, 100
D. Midgley, G. Dowling (1978)
Innovativeness: The Concept and Its MeasurementJournal of Consumer Research, 4
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the Domain Specific Innovativeness scale DSI for knowngroups validity. Data came from two groups of student volunteers 48 students registered for a specialty class in wine in the Hospitality Administration department of a US public university and 28 students from two marketing classes at the same institution, In addition to the DSI, the questionnaire contained multiitem scales to measure wine involvement, opinion leadership for wine, subjective and real knowledge of wine, and winerelated behaviour. The analysis verified that the DSI was highly correlated with the other wine measures, the two groups were quite different on all the measured wine variables, and that the DSI played a significant role in discriminating between the members of the two groups. These findings strongly support the validity of the DSI and promote its use in studies of wine innovators.
International Journal of Wine Marketing – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 1, 2000
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.