Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/emerald-publishing/identifying-interrelationships-among-factors-affecting-innovation-YM90WjXfUk
References (115)
-
E. Carayannis, D. Campbell (2012)
Editorial preface to the first volume of Journal of Innovation and EntrepreneurshipJournal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1
-
(2009)
The key obstacles and countermeasures against development of innovative SMEs in China -
M. Ceccagnoli, F. Rothaermel (2016)
Appropriability Strategies to Capture Value from InnovationAdvances in The Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, & Economic Growth, 26
-
Creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations
Strategic Management Journal, 31
-
S. Metcalfe, R. Ramlogan (2008)
Innovation systems and the competitive process in developing economiesThe Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 48
-
OECD (2017)
10.1787/fin_sme_ent-2017-en -
Ron Adner, Daniel Levinthal (2001)
Demand Heterogeneity and Technology Evolution: Implications for Product and Process InnovationManag. Sci., 47
-
M. Curley, B. Donnellan, Gabriel Costello (2013)
Innovation ecosystems: a conceptual framework -
Jose-Luis Calvo (2006)
Testing Gibrat’s Law for Small, Young and Innovating FirmsSmall Business Economics, 26
-
Autonomous team and new product development
Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29
-
C. Palmberg, T. Lemola
Governance of Innovation Systems -
M. Krist (2009)
Internationalization and Firm Performance: The Role of Intangible Resources -
(2011)
Components of innovation ecosystems: a cross-country study in international research -
Chai-Lee Goi (2017)
The impact of technological innovation on building a sustainable cityInternational Journal of Quality Innovation, 3
-
G. Easton, S. Jarrell (1998)
The Effects of Total Quality Management on Corporate Performance: An Empirical InvestigationThe Journal of Business, 71
-
E. Brouwer, A. Kleinknecht (1999)
Innovative output, and a firm's propensity to patent.: an exploration of CIS micro dataResearch Policy, 28
-
(2012)
The entrepreneurial university: a regional perspective -
(2008)
Methodological framework for analyzing social impact of technological innovations -
(1999)
Factor scores and factor structure -
A holistic model of building innovation ecosystems
Science Direct, IFAC-Papers OnLine, 48
-
J. Litwack, Y. Qian (1998)
Balanced or Unbalanced Development: Special Economic Zones as Catalysts for TransitionJournal of Comparative Economics, 26
-
S. Mulaik (1990)
Blurring the Distinctions Between Component Analysis and Common Factor Analysis.Multivariate behavioral research, 25 1
-
Sisi Liang (2011)
Physical planning strategies of national High-Technology Industrial Development Zones in China -
The political economy of intellectual property treaties
Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 20
-
Robert Yawson (2009)
The Ecological System of Innovation: A New Architectural Framework for a Functional Evidence-Based Platform for Science and Innovation PolicyIO: Productivity
-
P. Patanakul, J. Pinto (2014)
Examining the roles of government policy on innovationThe Journal of High Technology Management Research, 25
-
A. Arundel, Isabelle Kabla (1998)
What percentage of innovations are patented? empirical estimates for European firmsResearch Policy, 27
-
P. Bentley, Magnus Gulbrandsen, S. Kyvik (2015)
The relationship between basic and applied research in universitiesHigher Education, 70
-
Big losses in ecosystem niches: how core firm decisions drive complementary product shakeouts
Strategic Management. Journal, 30
-
L. Camarinha-Matos, H. Afsarmanesh (2007)
A comprehensive modeling framework for collaborative networked organizationsJournal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 18
-
K. Widaman (1993)
Common Factor Analysis Versus Principal Component Analysis: Differential Bias in Representing Model Parameters?Multivariate behavioral research, 28 3
-
Mita Bhattacharya, H. Bloch (2004)
Determinants of InnovationSmall Business Economics, 22
-
Jianhua Liu, Zhan Meng, Zhaohua Jiang (2017)
Analysis on Core Technologies and Cutting-edge Technologies of New Energy Based on Input-output Method ☆Procedia Engineering, 174
-
C. Frappaolo (2012)
The Evolution of Knowledge Management -
L. Fabrigar, D. Wegener, R. Maccallum, E. Strahan (1999)
Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research.Psychological Methods, 4
-
Xavier Sala-i-Martin (2016)
The global competitiveness report 2016–2017 -
(2009)
The growing interest on logistics hubs in China -
Wei Lü, Weitong Wang (2008)
Unbalanced development, public services and government responsibility: an analysis based on government preference and government efficiencySocial Sciences in China, 29
-
D. Teece (2007)
Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performanceSouthern Medical Journal, 28
-
(2012)
Principal component analysis – SPSS. at IBM.COM -
G. Tassey (2010)
Rationales and mechanisms for revitalizing US manufacturing R&D strategiesThe Journal of Technology Transfer, 35
-
Constance Helfat, Margaret Peteraf (2003)
The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecyclesStrategic Management Journal, 24
-
W. Lam, J. Shin (2012)
What Role Can Financial Policies Play in Revitalizing SMEs in Japan?Economic Growth eJournal
-
B. Potì, E. Reale (2020)
Government R&D funding: new approaches in the allocation policies for public and private beneficiaries -
R. Rabelo, P. Bernus (2015)
A Holistic Model of Building Innovation EcosystemsIFAC-PapersOnLine, 48
-
China’s system and vision of innovation
Industry and Innovation, 16
-
China’s innovation ecosystem
-
Margarida Vicente, J. Abrantes, M. Teixeira (2015)
Measuring innovation capability in exporting firms: the INNOVSCALEInternational Marketing Review, 32
-
Suzanne Scotchmer (2001)
The Political Economy of Intellectual Property Treaties -
Samira Aghmiuni, Saeed Siyal, Qiang Wang, Yuzhen Duan (2020)
Assessment of factors affecting innovation policy in biotechnologyJournal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5
-
P. Budden, F. Murray (2018)
An MIT framework for innovation ecosystem policy -
D. Oh, F. Phillips, Sehee Park, Eung-Hyun Lee (2016)
Innovation ecosystems: A critical examinationTechnovation, 54
-
Seyed Razavi, Omid Attarnezhad (2013)
Management of Organizational Innovation -
(2015)
Analysis of the reform and development of national scientific research institutions in developed countries -
(2004)
High-intensity marketing: a comprehensive marketing companion for CEOs and marketing professionals -
A. Gelman (2005)
Discussion of "Analysis of variance--why it is more important than ever" by A. GelmanarXiv: Statistics Theory
-
J. Lerner (2002)
When Bureaucrats Meet Entrepreneurs: The Design of Effective 'Public Venture Capital' ProgrammesOrganizations & Markets eJournal
-
K. Pavitt (1991)
What makes basic research economically usefulResearch Policy, 20
-
C. Lopes, A. Scavarda, Luiz Hofmeister, A. Thomé, G. Vaccaro (2017)
An analysis of the interplay between organizational sustainability, knowledge management, and open innovationJournal of Cleaner Production, 142
-
P. Davidsson, Johan Wiklund (2006)
Conceptual and Empirical Challenges in the Study of Firm Growth -
Xielin Liu, P. Cheng, Aoyu Chen (2011)
Basic research and catch-up in China's high-speed rail industryJournal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 9
-
F. Bryant, P. Yarnold (1995)
Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. -
Appropriability strategies to capture value from innovation. In technological innovation: generating economic results
-
Matthias Almus (2000)
Testing "Gibrat's Law" for Young Firms – Empirical Results for West GermanySmall Business Economics, 15
-
(2006)
Indigenous innovation: from concept to practice -
Zhong Xiwei, Y. Xiangdong (2007)
Science and technology policy reform and its impact on China's national innovation systemTechnology in Society, 29
-
Alvaro Vieites, Jose-Luis Calvo (2011)
A Study on the Factors That Influence Innovation Activities of Spanish Big FirmsTechnology and Investment, 2
-
N. Ash́ford (2002)
Government and Environmental Innovation in Europe and North AmericaAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 45
-
Stephen Martin, John Scott (1998)
Market Failures and the Design of Innovation Policy -
Guannan Xu, Yuchen Wu, T. Minshall, Yuan Zhou (2017)
Exploring innovation ecosystems across science, technology, and business: A case of 3D printing in ChinaTechnological Forecasting and Social Change
-
Paul David, D. Mowery, W. Steinmueller (1992)
Analysing The Economic Payoffs From Basic ResearchEconomics of Innovation and New Technology, 2
-
S. Durst, Petro Poutanen (2013)
Success factors of innovation ecosystems - Initial insights from a literature review -
D. North, D. Smallbone, I. Vickers (2001)
Public Sector Support for Innovating SMEsSmall Business Economics, 16
-
E. Carayannis, D. Campbell (2009)
'Mode 3' and 'Quadruple Helix': toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystemInt. J. Technol. Manag., 46
-
(2015)
The China effect on global innovation -
(2015)
The growth game-changer: how the industrial internet of things can drive progress and prosperity -
K. Bista, C. Foster (2015)
Global Perspectives and Local Challenges Surrounding International Student Mobility -
(2013)
Examining complex interactions of factors affecting innovation activities of firms. A field study of SMEs in six european countries -
C. Zaiontz (2018)
Real multivariate statistical analysis using excel -
Philip Camilleri (1986)
Factor AnalysisBulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique, 11
-
Andrew Goh (2005)
Promoting innovation in aid of industrial development: the Singaporean experienceInternational Journal of Public Sector Management, 18
-
E. Carayannis, Thorsten Barth, D. Campbell (2012)
The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovationJournal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1
-
(2012)
The Bayh-Dole act: issues in patent policy and the commercialization of technology -
D.J. Jackson (2011)
What is an innovation ecosystem? -
Ron Adner, R. Kapoor (2009)
Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology GenerationsStrategy & Economics
-
B. Tether (1998)
Small and large firms: sources of unequal innovations?Research Policy, 27
-
J. Bonin (1998)
The “Transition” in Comparative EconomicsJournal of Comparative Economics, 26
-
E. Santarelli, R. Piergiovanni (1996)
Analyzing literature-based innovation output indicators: the Italian experienceResearch Policy, 25
-
(2007)
Demand, innovation, and the dynamics of market structure: The role of experimental users and diverse preferencesJournal of Evolutionary Economics, 17
-
A. Hartmann (2006)
The context of innovation management in construction firmsConstruction Management and Economics, 24
-
R. Narasimha (2008)
Science, technology and the economy: an Indian perspectiveTechnology in Society, 30
-
D. Mowery (1998)
The changing structure of the US national innovation system: implications for international conflict and cooperation in R&D policyResearch Policy, 27
-
(2017)
Analysis of national public research: funding, a technical report by the joint research Centre (JRC), the european commission’s science and knowledge service -
P. Davidsson, Frédéric Delmar (1997)
High-growth firms : characteristics, job contribution and method observations -
Alexander Leitner, W. Wehrmeyer (2010)
The impact of regulation and policy on radical eco-innovation: The need for a new understandingManagement Research Review, 33
-
W. Zhongze (2015)
Status and trends of intelligent transportation in China -
A. Meyer, V. Gaba, Ken Colwell (2005)
Organizing Far from Equilibrium: Nonlinear Change in Organizational FieldsEwing Marion Kauffman Foundation Research Paper Series
-
(2000)
The six key phases of company growth -
J. Hernández, M. Noruzi, N. Sariolghalam (2007)
Types of Relationships between Firms, Communities and Governments and their ObstaclesEntrepreneurship & Management eJournal
-
(2014)
Capturing change in science, technology, and zones in China -
(1983)
Developing a regulatory bureaucracy -
G. Brooks, G. Johanson
Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods Sample Size Considerations for Multiple Comparison Procedures in Anova Sample Size Considerations for Multiple Comparison Procedures in Anova -
C. Freeman (1996)
The greening of technology and models of innovationTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, 53
-
M. Jacobides, Carmelo Cennamo, A. Gawer (2018)
Towards a Theory of EcosystemsResource Based Strategy & Policy eJournal
-
P. Patanakul, Jiyao Chen, Gary Lynn (2008)
Autonomous teams and new product developmentPICMET '08 - 2008 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology
-
(2017)
Report on the changing landscape of disruptive technologies -
Yanmei Zhu, X. Wittmann, Mike Peng (2012)
Institution-based barriers to innovation in SMEs in ChinaAsia Pacific Journal of Management, 29
-
L. Pierce (2008)
Big Losses in Ecosystem Niches: How Core Firm Decisions Drive Complementary Product ShakeoutsIO: Theory eJournal
-
Luis Berasategi, J. Arana, E. Castellano (2011)
A comprehensive framework for collaborative networked innovationProduction Planning & Control, 22
-
Heeyong Noh, Youngkeun Song, Sungjoon Lee (2016)
Identifying emerging core technologies for the futureTelecommunications Policy, 40
-
Sample size considerations for multiple comparison procedures in ANOVA
Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 10
-
B. Clarysse, M. Wright, Johan Bruneel, A. Mahajan (2014)
Creating value in ecosystems: Crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystemsResearch Policy, 43
-
Shulin Gu, B. Lundvall, Ju Liu, F. Malerba, Sylvia Serger (2009)
China's System and Vision of Innovation: An Analysis in Relation to the Strategic Adjustment and the Medium- to Long-Term S&T Development Plan (2006–20)Industry and Innovation, 16
-
Lisa Nichols, David Wynes (2018)
Engage research institutions on research regulatory reformScience, 361
-
Elena Gatti, Christina Richter (2019)
„Made in China 2025“Digitales China
- Publisher
- Emerald Publishing
- Copyright
- © Emerald Publishing Limited
- ISSN
- 1757-2223
- DOI
- 10.1108/ijis-04-2020-0040
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
This paper aims at studying the concept of innovation ecosystems and investigating the factors affecting them based on their interrelationships with respect to different innovation archetypes.Design/methodology/approachThe methodology is based on using multivariate statistical analysis of the inter-correlations among a number of variables which led to extracting a reduced set of new significant factors that affect China’s innovation ecosystem.FindingsThe results showed that innovation archetypes differ significantly with respect to the majority of the new factors.Practical implicationsThrough identifying these challenges, decision-makers can develop a better understanding of the variables affecting each archetype of innovation and act accordingly.Originality/valueThe study is the first to fill the gap of addressing a large number of variables affecting innovation and analyzing their interrelationships.
Journal
International Journal of Innovation Science – Emerald Publishing
Published: Dec 4, 2020
Keywords: Innovation ecosystem; Chinese technological innovation; Innovation archetype; Innovation capacity