Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

“I wouldn’t have let you in if you’d had a folder”

“I wouldn’t have let you in if you’d had a folder” The purpose of this paper is to discuss methodological issues connected to being a member of a stigmatised group invited to take part in a research study.Design/methodology/approachThis paper draws on experiences of interviewing young parents and their families about teenage parenthood. The paper reflects on how the feelings of young parents about being under surveillance all the time, by official agencies and in their communities, could lead to resistance to “official” visitors, role confusion relating to access, and a great deal of image management, all of which potentially influenced the interviews.FindingsParticipants may feel that they should consent to an interview because of their position as a member of a group accustomed to being under surveillance, but they can take the opportunity to use the interview to demonstrate their competence, in this case as mothers. Interviewing members of a stigmatised group such as teenage parents empowers them to challenge negative stereotypes normally encountered in discourses of teenage parenting, thus subverting a sense of feeling bound to take part in an interview and turning the encounter around to assert a positive identity.Originality/valueThe “positionality” of the researcher as an influence on the research process has been widely examined, the positionality of the participants less so. This paper highlights how members of a stigmatised and potentially vulnerable group position themselves, and by so doing, can use the interview as part of the process of asserting a valued identity. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Qualitative Research Journal Emerald Publishing

“I wouldn’t have let you in if you’d had a folder”

Brown, Sally
Qualitative Research Journal , Volume 19 (3): 10 – Jun 4, 2019
Download PDF
10 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/i-wouldn-t-have-let-you-in-if-you-d-had-a-folder-HalmBTY1O2
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1443-9883
DOI
10.1108/qrj-12-2018-0006
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to discuss methodological issues connected to being a member of a stigmatised group invited to take part in a research study.Design/methodology/approachThis paper draws on experiences of interviewing young parents and their families about teenage parenthood. The paper reflects on how the feelings of young parents about being under surveillance all the time, by official agencies and in their communities, could lead to resistance to “official” visitors, role confusion relating to access, and a great deal of image management, all of which potentially influenced the interviews.FindingsParticipants may feel that they should consent to an interview because of their position as a member of a group accustomed to being under surveillance, but they can take the opportunity to use the interview to demonstrate their competence, in this case as mothers. Interviewing members of a stigmatised group such as teenage parents empowers them to challenge negative stereotypes normally encountered in discourses of teenage parenting, thus subverting a sense of feeling bound to take part in an interview and turning the encounter around to assert a positive identity.Originality/valueThe “positionality” of the researcher as an influence on the research process has been widely examined, the positionality of the participants less so. This paper highlights how members of a stigmatised and potentially vulnerable group position themselves, and by so doing, can use the interview as part of the process of asserting a valued identity.

Journal

Qualitative Research Journal – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jun 4, 2019

Keywords: Interviews; Qualitative; Reflexivity; Consent; Researcher/participant interactions

References

  • Trying similarity, doing difference: the role of interviewer self-disclosure in interview talk with young people
    Abell, J.; Locke, A.; Condor, S.; Gibson, S.; Stevenson, C.
  • Low expectations, sexual attitudes and knowledge: explaining teenage pregnancy and fertility in English communities. Insights from qualitative research
    Arai, L.
  • Becoming respectable: low-income young mothers, consumption and the pursuit of value
    Banister, E.; Hogg, M.; Budds, K.; Dixon, M.
  • Favourites and others: reflexivity and the shaping of subjectivities and data in qualitative research
    Bott, E.
  • Using thematic analysis in psychology
    Braun, V.; Clarke, V.
  • What can ‘thematic analysis’ offer health and wellbeing researchers?
    Braun, V.; Clarke, V.
  • Individual responsibility and social constraint: the construction of adolescent motherhood in social scientific research
    Breheny, M.; Stephens, C.
  • The role of gender, environment and individual biography in shaping qualitative interview data
    Broom, A.; Hand, K.; Tovey, P.
  • The reflexive interview and a performative social science
    Denzin, N.
  • Displaying families
    Finch, J.
  • Mother, researcher, feminist, woman: reflections on “maternal status” as a researcher identity
    Frost, N.; Holt, A.
  • Interviewees with an agenda: learning from a ‘failed’ interview
    Jacobsson, K.; Åkerström, M.
  • Positioning and subjectivation in research interviews: why bother talking to a researcher?
    Jansen, A.
  • The voices heard and the voices silenced: recruitment processes in qualitative interview studies
    Kristensen, G.K.; Ravn, M.N.
  • The ‘bumpy road’ to becoming: capturing the stories that teenage mothers told about their journey into motherhood
    Leese, M.
  • Doing social research: issues and dilemmas
    Luff, D.
  • ‘You are what you research’: researcher partisanship and the sociology of the ‘underdog
    Lumsden, K.
  • Researching the researcher-as-instrument: an exercise in interviewer self-reflexivity
    Pezalla, A.; Pettigrew, J.; Miller-Day, M.
  • The ‘doctor’ or the ‘girl from the University’? Considering the influence of professional roles on qualitative interviewing
    Richards, H.; Emslie, C.
  • The research interview as discourses crossing swords: the researcher and apprentice on crossing roads
    Tanggaard, L.
  • ‘Your age don’t determine whether you’re a good mum.’ Reframing the discourse of deviance ascribed to teenage mothers
    Vincent, K.; Thomson, P.
  • ‘I know I’m a good mum – no one can tell me different.’ Young mothers negotiating a stigmatised identity through time
    Wenham, A.