Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Ferlie, L. Ashburner, L. Fitzgerald, A. Pettigrew (1996)
The New Public Management in Action
Jostein Askim, Tom Christensen, Anne Fimreite, Per Lægreid (2010)
HOW TO ASSESS ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM? INVESTIGATING THE ADOPTION AND PRELIMINARY IMPACTS OF THE NORWEGIAN WELFARE ADMINISTRATION REFORMPublic Administration, 88
C. Hood (1995)
The “new public management” in the 1980s: Variations on a themeAccounting Organizations and Society, 20
P. Miller, Liisa Kurunmäki, T. O'Leary (2008)
Accounting, hybrids and the management of riskAccounting Organizations and Society, 33
Liisa Kurunmäki (2002)
Modernising Government: The Calculating Self, Hybridisation and Performance MeasurementWiley-Blackwell: Financial Accountability & Management in Governments
Liisa Kurunmäki, P. Miller (2011)
Regulatory hybrids: Partnerships, budgeting and modernising governmentManagement Accounting Research, 22
M. Bovens (2007)
Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual FrameworkWiley-Blackwell: European Law Journal
F. Wiesel, Sven Modell (2014)
From New Public Management to New Public Governance? Hybridization and Implications for Public Sector ConsumerismERN: Public Administration (Topic)
Wolfgang Gerstlberger, Karsten Schneider (2013)
Outsourcing and concession models as door opener for public-private partnerships in the European health sector?International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26
M. Vries, J. Nemec (2013)
Public Sector Reform: An overview of recent literature and research on NPM and alternative pathsInternational Journal of Public Sector Management, 26
Liisa Kurunmäki (2004)
A hybrid profession—the acquisition of management accounting expertise by medical professionalsAccounting Organizations and Society, 29
R. Behn (1998)
The new public management paradigm and the search for democratic accountabilityInternational Public Management Journal, 1
I. Pettersen, Kari Nyland (2011)
Reforms and accounting system changesJournal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 7
H. Rainey, Barry Bozeman (2000)
Comparing Public and Private Organizations: Empirical Research and the Power of the A PrioriJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10
C. Hood (1998)
The Art of the State: Culture, Rhetoric, and Public Management
J. Broadbent, M. Dietrich, R. Laughlin (1996)
THE DEVELOPMENT OF PRINCIPAL–AGENT, CONTRACTING AND ACCOUNTABILITY RELATIONSHIPS IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: CONCEPTUAL AND CULTURAL PROBLEMSCritical Perspectives on Accounting, 7
Haldor Byrkjeflot, P. Jespersen (2014)
Three conceptualizations of hybrid management in hospitalsInternational Journal of Public Sector Management, 27
T. Brandsen, W. Donk, Kim Putters (2005)
Griffins or Chameleons? Hybridity as a Permanent and Inevitable Characteristic of the Third SectorInternational Journal of Public Administration, 28
Michael Jensen, W. Meckling (1976)
Theory of the Firm
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss why public sector reforms hybridize during implementation processes, consequences on accountability relations and practitioners’ and policymakers’ reactions to these changes. Design/methodology/approach – The paper considers experiences from three initiatives related to the governance reform in the Norwegian hospital sector. Data were collected via interviews and document studies, and all three cases were longitudinal studies. Findings – Unexpected consequences of reform initiatives and contextual changes are causing controls to hybridize and having profound effects on accountability relations. However, the gradually alignment of controls in a dynamic pattern of hybridization enables the balancing of conflicts in the chain of accountabilities. Hybrid controls are observed to emerge as stronger than the initial ideal control models. The longitudinal studies of control hybridization illuminate the sector’s survival in the long run, as they allow for adaptation to changes in contexts. Practical implications – This work augments leaders’ understanding of how governmental strategies may follow diverse paths and yield results that diverge from intentions. Narrow accountability bases inhibit the government from implementing political decisions through agencies. Conversely, agents must relate to direct control from authorities. The predictability of agents’ decision space is reduced, and the control process becomes more ambiguous. Originality/value – Through connecting what happens in agencies with accountabilities in the political level, it is possible to study the flexible nature of accountability relations and why controls hybridize. The paper underlines the need for longitudinal studies to describe complex patterns of reform initiatives.
International Journal of Public Sector Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 2, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.