Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Wilbur Lewellen (1971)
A PURE FINANCIAL RATIONALE FOR THE CONGLOMERATE MERGERJournal of Finance, 26
C. Hill (1988)
Corporate Control Type, Strategy, Size and Financial Performance[1]Journal of Management Studies, 25
Y. Doz, C. Prahalad (1984)
Patterns of Strategic Control Within Multinational CorporationsJournal of International Business Studies, 15
Andrei Shleifer, Robert Vishny (1989)
Management entrenchment: The case of manager-specific investmentsJournal of Financial Economics, 25
Anil Gupta, S. Seshadri (1994)
HORIZONTAL RESOURCE SHARING: A PRINCIPAL-AGENT APPROACH., 1994
Vincent Barker, P. Patterson, George Mueller (2001)
Organizational Causes and Strategic Consequences of the Extent of Top Management Team Replacement During Turnaround AttemptsJournal of Management Studies, 38
B. Wernerfelt (1984)
A Resource-Based View of the FirmSouthern Medical Journal, 5
Paul Milgrom, John Roberts (1988)
An Economic Approach to Influence Activities in OrganizationsAmerican Journal of Sociology, 94
M. Goold, M. Alexander, A. Campbell (1994)
Corporate-Level Strategy: Creating Value in the Multibusiness Company
(2012)
The Power of Diversified Companies during Crises
R. Rajan, H. Servaes, Luigi Zingales (1998)
The Cost of Diversity: The Diversification Discount and Inefficient InvestmentS&P Global Market Intelligence Research Paper Series
R. Taggart (1987)
ALLOCATING CAPITAL AMONG A FIRM'S DIVISIONS: HURDLE RATES VS. BUDGETSJournal of Financial Research, 10
C. Markides, P. Williamson (2007)
Related diversification, core competences and corporate performanceStrategic Management Journal, 15
D. Teece (1980)
ECONOMIES OF SCOPE AND THE SCOPE OF THE ENTERPRISEJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1
Alfred Rappaport (1990)
The staying power of the public corporation.Harvard business review, 68 1
L. Palich, Laura Cardinal, C. Miller (2000)
Curvilinearity in the diversification–performance linkage: an examination of over three decades of researchStrategic Management Journal, 21
Alfred Chandler (1991)
The functions of the HQ unit in the multibusiness firmSouthern Medical Journal, 12
R. Grant (1991)
The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy FormulationCalifornia Management Review, 33
Hüseyin Tanriverdi, N. Venkatraman (2005)
Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firmsSouthern Medical Journal, 26
Sandro Brusco, Fausto Panunzi (2000)
Reallocation of Corporate Resources and Managerial Incentives in Internal Capital MarketsCorporate Finance: Valuation
James Westphal (1999)
Collaboration in the Boardroom: Behavioral and Performance Consequences of CEO-Board Social TiesAcademy of Management Journal, 42
Juha-Matti Junnonen (1998)
Strategy formation in construction firmsEngineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 5
M. Goold, A. Campbell, M. Alexander
Corporate‐level Strategy: Creating Value in the Multibusiness Firm
A. Oijen, S. Douma (2000)
Diversification Strategy and the Roles of the CentreLong Range Planning, 33
C. John, J. Harrison (1999)
Manufacturing-based relatedness, synergy, and coordinationStrategic Management Journal, 20
W. Ouchi, O. Williamson (1977)
Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications.Administrative Science Quarterly, 22
Matthias Kruehler, Ulrich Pidun (2011)
Parenting Approaches in Corporate Strategy an Exploratory Study on the Impact of Portfolio Structure and CultureSchmalenbach Business Review, 63
Andrew Campbell, M. Goold (1995)
Corporate strategy: The quest for parenting advantageHarvard Business Review, 73
C. Prahalad, G. Hamel (1990)
The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. pp. ., 68
B. Golden, Haofei Ma (2003)
Mutual Forbearance: The Role of Intrafirm Integration and RewardsAcademy of Management Review, 28
E. Bowman, Constance Helfat (2001)
Does corporate strategy matterStrategic Management Journal, 22
M. Goold, Andrew Campbell (1998)
Desperately seeking synergy.Harvard business review, 76 5
David Collis, D. Young, M. Goold (2007)
The size, structure and performance of corporate headquartersStrategic Direction, 23
Hyun-Han Shin, René Stulz (1998)
Are Internal capital Markets EfficientQuarterly Journal of Economics, 113
Malcolm Salter, Wolf Weinhold (1979)
Diversification Through Acquisition: Strategies for Creating Economic Value
M. Goold, Andrew Campbell (2002)
Parenting in Complex StructuresLong Range Planning, 35
Thomas Fuchs, J. Gegelia, Stefan Scherer (2003)
Structure of the nucleon in chiral perturbation theoryThe European Physical Journal A - Hadrons and Nuclei, 19
S. Dwyer (1999)
DESPERATELY SEEKING SYNERGIESPrepared foods, 168
Anurag Mishra, M. Akbar (2007)
Parenting Advantage in Business Groups of Emerging MarketsVision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 11
B. Yavitz, W. Newman (1982)
WHAT THE CORPORATION SHOULD PROVIDE ITS BUSINESS UNITSJournal of Business Strategy, 3
Thomas Brush (1996)
PREDICTED CHANGE IN OPERATIONAL SYNERGY AND POST‐ACQUISITION PERFORMANCE OF ACQUIRED BUSINESSESStrategic Management Journal, 17
Y. Amihud, B. Lev (1981)
Risk Reduction as a Managerial Motive for Conglomerate MergersThe Bell Journal of Economics, 12
J. Bower (1970)
Managing the resource allocation process: A study of corporate planning and investment
J. Stein (1995)
Internal Capital Markets and the Competition for Corporate Resources
M. Porter (1985)
Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance
Gareth Jones, C. Hill (1988)
Transaction cost analysis of strategy‐structure choiceSouthern Medical Journal, 9
H.I. Ansoff
Corporate Strategy
G. Owen, T. Harrison (1995)
Why ICI chose to demergeHarvard Business Review, 73
J. Barney (1991)
Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive AdvantageJournal of Management, 17
C. Prahalad, G. Hamel (1990)
The Core Competence of the CorporationHarvard Business Review, 68
Owen Lamont (1996)
Cash Flow and Investment: Evidence from Internal Capital MarketsCorporate Finance: Valuation
L. Vogel, Acsw Ma (1986)
Strategy and StructureAdministration in Social Work, 10
David Sadtler (1999)
The third questionLong Range Planning, 32
C. Moore, G. Birtwistle (2005)
The nature of parenting advantage in luxury fashion retailing – the case of Gucci group NVInternational Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 33
Purpose – The major purpose of this paper is the development of a theoretical framework that can be used by corporate practitioners to understand the implicit parenting strategy of their company, assess its performance, and adjust it for improving the net corporate value creation. Design/methodology/approach – In this paper, a three‐dimensional framework is developed that accounts for corporate‐to‐business and business‐to‐business interactions, value‐adding and value‐destroying activities, and strategic and operational levers. The framework is operationalized by assigning a broad set of individual activities to these levers. Findings – The paper delivers a robust, systematic, and operational framework to assess the net benefits to a given business of being part of a corporate portfolio, and to identify and evaluate implicit parenting strategies in corporate practice. While previous studies mainly focused on broad parenting approaches with low granularity this framework now allows earlier observations to be substantiated, finer distinctions between the applied strategies to be drawn, and the core of superior value added approaches to be investigated. Practical implications – The introduced framework can be used to analyze the origin and underlying drivers of conglomerate discounts and premia and thus enhance understanding of capital market valuation of multi‐business companies. The developed framework can also be the basis for the derivation of a typology of corporate parenting strategies. In this way, it can support practitioners in portfolio management – which was also the explicit motivation for the development of the original parenting advantage concept. Originality/value – The outlined framework will facilitate the investigation of structural, strategic, and organizational roots of superior parenting strategies in corporate practice. It may be used to analyze performance differences of multi‐business companies that go beyond the degree of diversification and may finally contribute to solving the puzzle of the conglomerate discount.
Journal of Business Strategy – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 13, 2012
Keywords: Corporate strategy; Parenting advantage; Multi‐business firm; Parent companies; Performance measures
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.