Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/emerald-publishing/how-professional-are-our-professional-bodies-the-differences-in-8AoArqktU0
References (3)
-
N. Jackson (1998)
Understanding standards‐based quality assurance: part II ‐ nuts and bolts of the “Dearing“ policy frameworkQuality Assurance in Education, 6
-
Stig Enemark (1998)
The Growing Importance of CPD -
P. Newton (1996)
The Reliability of Marking of General Certificate of Secondary Education Scripts: mathematics and EnglishBritish Educational Research Journal, 22
- Publisher
- Emerald Publishing
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2001 MCB UP Ltd. All rights reserved.
- ISSN
- 0140-9174
- DOI
- 10.1108/01409170110782478
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Attempts to indicate good practice within national examining boards and professional bodies with various GCSE and A level boards, considering the codes of practice issued by the QCA. Covers setting the paper, the role of the chief examiner, consistent marking standards, the examining team, co‐ordination of marking standards, and post marking checks. Suggests that the procedures are quite robust and other examining boards and professional bodies have begun to emulate these procedures which should reassure the general public regarding quality.
Journal
Management Research News – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 1, 2001
Keywords: Professional institutes; Professional qualifications; Standards; Quality assurance