How large companies react to negative Facebook comments

How large companies react to negative Facebook comments Purpose – Of Fortune 100 companies 79 percent use some form of social media to communicate with customers and other stakeholders. However, these media pose the risk of providing a forum for comments critical of corporate leadership, services, or products. Most marketing specialists recommend that negative comments should be treated as opportunities to resolve potential problems. This paper seeks to assess whether large companies adopt the recommended approach when reacting to negative comments. Design/methodology/approach – The study identifies official Facebook pages sponsored by the top ten companies (as defined by the Forbes 2000 for 2010) in four industry groups – banking, retailing, software and services, and household and personal products. The number of negative comments posted to these pages is calculated and corporate reactions to the comments analyzed. Findings – The study concludes that large corporations do not generally approach negative comments as public relations opportunities, but prefer to censor, or ignore, critical feedback. Practical implications – Results of the investigation indicate that negative comments are most likely to be posted in response to explicit marketing messages initiated by sponsoring corporations. Companies that combine marketing messages and “fun” postings attract significantly fewer negative comments. Originality/value – This study is the first quantitative examination of the manner by which major corporations respond – or fail to respond – to negative feedback generated by Facebook “fans”. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Corporate Communications: An International Journal Emerald Publishing

How large companies react to negative Facebook comments

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/how-large-companies-react-to-negative-facebook-comments-68bgg90L3k
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2012 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1356-3289
DOI
10.1108/13563281211253539
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – Of Fortune 100 companies 79 percent use some form of social media to communicate with customers and other stakeholders. However, these media pose the risk of providing a forum for comments critical of corporate leadership, services, or products. Most marketing specialists recommend that negative comments should be treated as opportunities to resolve potential problems. This paper seeks to assess whether large companies adopt the recommended approach when reacting to negative comments. Design/methodology/approach – The study identifies official Facebook pages sponsored by the top ten companies (as defined by the Forbes 2000 for 2010) in four industry groups – banking, retailing, software and services, and household and personal products. The number of negative comments posted to these pages is calculated and corporate reactions to the comments analyzed. Findings – The study concludes that large corporations do not generally approach negative comments as public relations opportunities, but prefer to censor, or ignore, critical feedback. Practical implications – Results of the investigation indicate that negative comments are most likely to be posted in response to explicit marketing messages initiated by sponsoring corporations. Companies that combine marketing messages and “fun” postings attract significantly fewer negative comments. Originality/value – This study is the first quantitative examination of the manner by which major corporations respond – or fail to respond – to negative feedback generated by Facebook “fans”.

Journal

Corporate Communications: An International JournalEmerald Publishing

Published: Aug 3, 2012

Keywords: Communication; Communication technologies; Public relations; Customer satisfaction; Stakeholder analysis; Social networks; Corporate image

There are no references for this article.

You’re reading a free preview. Subscribe to read the entire article.


DeepDyve is your
personal research library

It’s your single place to instantly
discover and read the research
that matters to you.

Enjoy affordable access to
over 18 million articles from more than
15,000 peer-reviewed journals.

All for just $49/month

Explore the DeepDyve Library

Search

Query the DeepDyve database, plus search all of PubMed and Google Scholar seamlessly

Organize

Save any article or search result from DeepDyve, PubMed, and Google Scholar... all in one place.

Access

Get unlimited, online access to over 18 million full-text articles from more than 15,000 scientific journals.

Your journals are on DeepDyve

Read from thousands of the leading scholarly journals from SpringerNature, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford University Press and more.

All the latest content is available, no embargo periods.

See the journals in your area

DeepDyve

Freelancer

DeepDyve

Pro

Price

FREE

$49/month
$360/year

Save searches from
Google Scholar,
PubMed

Create folders to
organize your research

Export folders, citations

Read DeepDyve articles

Abstract access only

Unlimited access to over
18 million full-text articles

Print

20 pages / month