Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
U. Lichtenthaler, Eckhard Lichtenthaler (2009)
A Capability-Based Framework for Open Innovation: Complementing Absorptive CapacityWiley-Blackwell: Journal of Management Studies
W. Viriyasitavat, D. Hoonsopon (2019)
Blockchain characteristics and consensus in modern business processesJ. Ind. Inf. Integr., 13
Ecological Economics, 61
M. Mubarik, S. Kazmi, S. Zaman (2021)
Application of gray DEMATEL-ANP in green-strategic sourcingTechnology in Society, 64
Liping Fu, Ye Zhang, Xiong Xiong, Yin Bai (2017)
Pro-Environmental Awareness and Behaviors on Campus: Evidence from Tianjin, ChinaEurasia journal of mathematics, science and technology education, 14
R. Vidgen (2020)
Creating business value from big data and business analytics : organizational, managerial and human resource implications
J. Yang, Taewoo Roh (2019)
Open for Green Innovation: From the Perspective of Green Process and Green Consumer InnovationSustainability
Mairi Kerin, D. Pham (2019)
University of Birmingham A review of emerging industry 4.0 technologies in remanufacturing
M. Mubarak, M. Petraite (2020)
Industry 4.0 technologies, digital trust and technological orientation: What matters in open innovation?Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161
V. Thakur, S. Mangla (2019)
Change management for sustainability: Evaluating the role of human, operational and technological factors in leading Indian firms in home appliances sectorJournal of Cleaner Production
Jay Lee, M. Azamfar, Jaskaran Singh (2019)
A blockchain enabled Cyber-Physical System architecture for Industry 4.0 manufacturing systemsManufacturing Letters
Managing Innovation and Change, 127
Tarique Mahmood, M. Mubarik (2020)
Balancing innovation and exploitation in the fourth industrial revolution: Role of intellectual capital and technology absorptive capacityTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, 160
Johan Jansson, A. Marell, A. Nordlund (2010)
Green consumer behavior: determinants of curtailment and eco‐innovation adoptionJournal of Consumer Marketing, 27
Ecological Economics, 78
U. Lichtenthaler (2011)
Open Innovation: Past Research, Current Debates, and Future DirectionsAcademy of Management Perspectives, 25
H. Chesbrough (2003)
Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology
Guangpei Li, Xiaoyu Wang, Jinhua Wu (2019)
How scientific researchers form green innovation behavior: An empirical analysis of China's enterprisesTechnology in Society
P. Stern (2000)
New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant BehaviorJournal of Social Issues, 56
M. Song, Shuhong Wang (2016)
Can employment structure promote environment-biased technical progress?Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112
D. Salampasis, A. Mention, M. Torkkeli (2014)
Open innovation and collaboration in the financial services sector: exploring the role of trustInternational Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 8
Yuan Ma, Guisheng Hou, Qiyue Yin, Baogui Xin, Yajun Pan (2018)
The sources of green management innovation: Does internal efficiency demand pull or external knowledge supply push?Journal of Cleaner Production
(2007)
Workshop Conclusions Ontypology and Framework, Measuring Ecoinnovation (MEI) Project, UNU MERIT, Maastricht
H. Chesbrough (2020)
To recover faster from Covid-19, open up: Managerial implications from an open innovation perspectiveIndustrial Marketing Management, 88
(2015)
the future of productivity and growth in manufacturing industries
Suman Tiwari, S. Chan, M. Mubarak (2018)
Critical analysis of procurement techniques in construction management sectorsIOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 342
Vichathorn Piyathanavong, J. Garza‐Reyes, Prof Kumar, Gonzalo Maldonado-Guzmán, S. Mangla (2019)
The adoption of operational environmental sustainability approaches in the Thai manufacturing sectorJournal of Cleaner Production
Harishankar Vidyarthi, R. Tiwari (2019)
Cost, revenue, and profit efficiency characteristics, and intellectual capital in Indian BanksJournal of Intellectual Capital, 21
Miguel Caldas (2003)
Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 7
Gunjan Yadav, Anil Kumar, S. Luthra, J. Garza‐Reyes, Vikas Kumar, L. Batista (2020)
A framework to achieve sustainability in manufacturing organisations of developing economies using industry 4.0 technologies' enablersComput. Ind., 122
S. Khaitan, J. McCalley (2015)
Design Techniques and Applications of Cyberphysical Systems: A SurveyIEEE Systems Journal, 9
K. Rennings, Andreas Ziegler, K. Rehfeld (2007)
Integrated Product Policy and Environmental Product Innovations: An Empirical AnalysisEnvironmental Economics
Robert Straughan, James Roberts (1999)
Environmental segmentation alternatives: a look at green consumer behavior in the new
Yu‐Shan Chen, Shyh-Bao Lai, C. Wen (2006)
The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in TaiwanJournal of Business Ethics, 67
Adam Sanders, C. Elangeswaran, J. Wulfsberg (2016)
Industry 4.0 implies lean manufacturing: Research activities in industry 4.0 function as enablers for lean manufacturingJournal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 9
Anfiteatro Economic Journal, 14
G. Beier, André Ullrich, Silke Niehoff, Malte Reißig, Matthew Habich (2020)
Industry 4.0: How it is defined from a sociotechnical perspective and how much sustainability it includes – A literature reviewJournal of Cleaner Production, 259
Veer Shivajee, R. Singh, S. Rastogi (2019)
Manufacturing conversion cost reduction using quality control tools and digitization of real-time dataJournal of Cleaner Production
Chetna Chauhan, Abhishek Sharma, Amol Singh (2019)
A SAP-LAP linkages framework for integrating Industry 4.0 and circular economyBenchmarking: An International Journal
H. Lasi, P. Fettke, H.-G. Kemper, T. Feld, M. Hoffmann (2014)
Industry 4.0Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6
Joseph Hair, M. Sarstedt, Lucas Hopkins, Volker Kuppelwieser (2014)
Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business researchEuropean Business Review, 26
Ravinder Kumar (2020)
Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Era of Digitialization
M. Mubarik, R. Rasi, Muhamamad Mubarak (2020)
Fostering Supply Chain Integration through Blockchain Technology: A Study of Malaysian Manufacturing SectorInternational Journal of Management and Sustainability
Lenny Koh, A. Dolgui, J. Sarkis (2020)
Blockchain in transport and logistics – paradigms and transitionsInternational Journal of Production Research, 58
J. Henkel (2006)
Selective revealing in open innovation processes: The case of embedded LinuxResearch Policy, 35
Andrea Mina, Elif Bascavusoglu-Moreau, A. Hughes (2014)
Open service innovation and the firm's search for external knowledgeResearch Policy, 43
Amulya Gurtu, Jestin Johny (2019)
Potential of blockchain technology in supply chain management: a literature reviewInternational Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 49
THE 17 GOALS sustainable development
G. Nawanir (2016)
The effect of lean manufacturing on operations performance and business performance in manufacturing companies in Indonesia
Journal of Cleaner Production, 237
I. Savitskaya, P. Salmi, M. Torkkeli (2010)
Barriers to Open Innovation: Case ChinaJournal of Technology Management & Innovation, 5
M. Mubarik, Navaz Naghavi, M. Mubarik, Simonov Kusi‐Sarpong, S. Khan, S. Zaman, S. Kazmi (2021)
Resilience and cleaner production in industry 4.0: Role of supply chain mapping and visibilityJournal of Cleaner Production, 292
Digital trust in the IoT era
Emily Huddart-Kennedy, T. Beckley, B. Mcfarlane, Solange Nadeau (2009)
Rural-Urban Differences in Environmental Concern in Canada.Rural Sociology, 74
M. Mubarak, F. Shaikh, M. Mubarik, K. Samo, S. Mastoi (2019)
The Impact of Digital Transformation on Business Performance: A Study of Pakistani SMEsEngineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 9
L. Atzori, A. Iera, G. Morabito (2010)
The Internet of Things: A surveyComput. Networks, 54
Huanhuan Feng, Xiang Wang, Y. Duan, Jian Zhang, Xiaoshuan Zhang (2020)
Applying blockchain technology to improve agri-food traceability: A review of development methods, benefits and challengesJournal of Cleaner Production
Gautam Dutta, Ravinder Kumar, Rahul Sindhwani, R. Singh (2020)
Digital transformation priorities of India’s discrete manufacturing SMEs – a conceptual study in perspective of Industry 4.0Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal Incorporating Journal of Global Competitiveness, 30
Keld Laursen, A. Salter (2006)
Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firmsSouthern Medical Journal, 27
Dan-Cristian Dabija, B. Bejan, D. Grant (2018)
The Impact of Consumer Green Behaviour on Green Loyalty Among Retail Formats: A Romanian Case StudyMoravian Geographical Reports, 26
(2011)
The Psychology of Environmental Problems: Psychology for Sustainability
J. Horbach, C. Rammer, K. Rennings (2011)
Determinants of Eco-innovations by Type of Environmental Impact: The Role of Regulatory Push/Pull, Technology Push and Market PullERN: Econometric Modeling in Microeconomics (Topic)
V. Marchi (2012)
ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND R&D COOPERATION: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM SPANISH MANUFACTURING FIRMSResearch Policy, 41
K. Tang, Y. Qiu, Di Zhou (2020)
Does command-and-control regulation promote green innovation performance? Evidence from China's industrial enterprises.The Science of the total environment, 712
J. Thøgersen, Folke Ölander (2003)
Spillover of environment-friendly consumer behaviourJournal of Environmental Psychology, 23
Yanling Chang, E. Iakovou, W. Shi (2019)
Blockchain in global supply chains and cross border trade: a critical synthesis of the state-of-the-art, challenges and opportunitiesInternational Journal of Production Research, 58
Malaysia -share of economic sectors in the gross domestic product
Muhammad Imran, W. Hameed, Adnan Haque (2018)
Influence of Industry 4.0 on the Production and Service Sectors in Pakistan: Evidence from Textile and Logistics IndustriesSocial Sciences
Michael Lieder, F. Asif, A. Rashid, A. Mihelic, Simon Kotnik (2017)
Towards circular economy implementation in manufacturing systems using a multi-method simulation approach to link design and business strategyThe International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 93
H. Kaufmann, M. Panni, Y. Orphanidou (2012)
Factors Affecting Consumers’ Green Purchasing Behavior: An Integrated Conceptual FrameworkThe AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, 14
M. Mubarik, N. Bontis, M. Mubarik, Tarique Mahmood (2021)
Intellectual capital and supply chain resilienceJournal of Intellectual Capital
Bongsu Kim, Eonsoo Kim, N. Foss (2016)
Balancing absorptive capacity and inbound open innovation for sustained innovative performance: An attention-based viewEuropean Management Journal, 34
Colin Cheng, Chen-Lung Yang, C. Sheu (2014)
The link between eco-innovation and business performance: a Taiwanese industry contextJournal of Cleaner Production, 64
M. Mubarak, W. Yusoff, M. Mubarik, Sumandev Tiwari, Khalil Kaya (2019)
Nurturing Entrepreneurship Ecosystem in a Developing Economy: Myths and RealitiesJournal of Technology Management and Business
M. Pan, Janusz Sikorski, Catharine Kastner, J. Akroyd, S. Mosbach, Raymond Lau, M. Kraft (2015)
Applying Industry 4.0 to the Jurong Island Eco-industrial ParkEnergy Procedia, 75
Manjot Bhatia, S. Jakhar, S. Mangla, K. Gangwani (2020)
Critical factors to environment management in a closed loop supply chainJournal of Cleaner Production, 255
M. Petraite (2019)
Developing Innovation Culture in the Baltics: Organizational Challenges in a Time of TransitionManaging Innovation in a Global and Digital World
(2019)
Key issues and challenges of the green consumer in consuming green product an insight from the emerging country: Malaysia
J. Metcalfe (1995)
Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary frameworkCambridge Journal of Economics, 19
V. Alcácer, V. Cruz-Machado (2019)
Scanning the Industry 4.0: A Literature Review on Technologies for Manufacturing SystemsEngineering Science and Technology, an International Journal
V. Marchi, R. Grandinetti (2013)
Knowledge strategies for environmental innovations: the case of Italian manufacturing firmsJ. Knowl. Manag., 17
M. Ghobakhloo (2020)
Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainabilityJournal of Cleaner Production, 252
(2003)
The exploration of the relationship between the environmental pressure and the corporate competitive advantage
K. Asakawa, Hiroshi Nakamura, Naohiro Sawada (2010)
Firms' Open Innovation Policies, Laboratories' External Collaborations, and Laboratories' R&D PerformanceEntrepreneurship
O. Gassmann, Ellen Enkel (2004)
Towards a Theory of Open Innovation: Three Core Process Archetypes
C. Gan, H. Wee, Luzie Ozanne, Tzu-Hui Kao (2017)
Consumers' purchasing behavior towards green products in New Zealand, 4
Jimeno Revilla (2003)
AND SYNTHESIS
Michela Piccarozzi, Barbara Aquilani, C. Gatti (2018)
Industry 4.0 in Management Studies: A Systematic Literature ReviewSustainability
H. Chesbrough (2003)
The Era of Open InnovationMIT Sloan Management Review, 44
This study investigates the impact of Industry 4.0 technologies on green innovation performance. In this relationship, the mediating role of green innovation behavior is also studied. Moreover, open innovation is tested as a mediator between Industry 4.0 technologies and green innovation behavior.Design/methodology/approachA quantitative research method is adopted in which a structured questionnaire was used to collect data from 217 manufacturing firms of Malaysia. After collecting data, the partial least squares-structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) technique is applied to analyze data and test the hypothesis of study.FindingsIt is found that Industry 4.0 positively impacts open innovation which leads to green innovation behavior. Also, the former lays positive impact on green innovation behavior which leads to improve green innovation performance.Research limitations/implicationsThe authors conclude that Industry 4.0 technologies can play an important role to improve green innovation performance of Malaysian manufacturing firms by managing open innovation for green innovation behavior which further improves the green innovation performance. In this context, it is recommended that strategists and policymakers should undertake the role of open innovation and Industry 4.0 technologies to promote environment-friendly innovations and to promote the green behavior in companies. The authors suggest hereby that firms should be given incentives to adopt and utilize Industry 4.0 technologies and collaborative innovation interactions – as they foster a climate for sustainable green innovations (which is also a key component to achieve competitive advantage) and a growing concern nowadays.Practical implicationsFirst of all the research contributes to achieving the broader of United Nations to promote sustainable innovation through green innovations. Moreover, the companies can also incorporate the findings and insights of this study while devising their policies to foster green innovations.Originality/valueThis research has done the novel contribution by bridging the gap between open innovation approach and sustainability fields while promoting green innovations in small and medium enterprises (SMEs). These two research fields are rarely studied in previous studies by focusing open innovation particularly. Hence, the authors suggest researchers to undertake these fields to further enhance the level of scholarship between innovation management and sustainability. Also, the authors recommend considering technological orientation and technological absorptive capacity of firms to improve green innovations. The current study has investigated the SMEs perspective in general irrespective to their sectoral differences, thus, for future researchers the authors suggest investigating the sector-wise comparison, i.e. electrical and electronics sector, chemical sector, etc.; or service and manufacturing sector differences.
Management of Environmental Quality An International Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 20, 2021
Keywords: Industry 4.0; Open innovation; Green innovation performance; SMEs; PLS-SEM
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.