Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

How history can inform corporate responsibility: the statutory rule of profit allocation

How history can inform corporate responsibility: the statutory rule of profit allocation This study aims to present how a historical governance mechanism (a statutory rule of profit allocation) could answer the practical question of profit allocation, thereby proposing a methodology to enhance future quantitative studies.Design/methodology/approachThe rule sets profit allocations to a predetermined set of stakeholders in corporate charters. It could be seen as a tool used by historical organisations to enact corporate social responsibility (CSR). The authors propose a straightforward way to calculate the payout ratios promised by this rule to each stakeholder. This methodology was applied to shareholders and used to calculate the promised dividend payout ratios.FindingsThis rule constitutes a natural experiment from which modern organisations could learn to implement the most relevant profit-allocation schemes given their CSR strategy. The authors propose calculating a promised payout ratio that would allow scholars to empirically examine the rule and its effects and provide accurate recommendations to these organisations.Research limitations/implicationsThis mechanism allows the study of profit allocations made to stakeholders (not limited to shareholders or employees like it is usually done). The promised payout ratio makes future quantitative investigations possible.Practical implicationsModern organisations could use the CSR mechanism to allocate profits continuously in formats that would best fit their strategy and environment.Originality/valueTo the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first article to examine the statutory rule of profit allocation per se, which proposes a new methodology to calculate payout ratios promised by the rule. The idea is to investigate their impact and provide recommendations for modern organisations to adapt. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Management History Emerald Publishing

How history can inform corporate responsibility: the statutory rule of profit allocation

Bonhoure, Emilie
Journal of Management History , Volume 29 (1): 30 – Jan 16, 2023
Download PDF
30 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/how-history-can-inform-corporate-responsibility-the-statutory-rule-of-GSg0kO9qCv
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1751-1348
eISSN
1751-1348
DOI
10.1108/jmh-10-2021-0054
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This study aims to present how a historical governance mechanism (a statutory rule of profit allocation) could answer the practical question of profit allocation, thereby proposing a methodology to enhance future quantitative studies.Design/methodology/approachThe rule sets profit allocations to a predetermined set of stakeholders in corporate charters. It could be seen as a tool used by historical organisations to enact corporate social responsibility (CSR). The authors propose a straightforward way to calculate the payout ratios promised by this rule to each stakeholder. This methodology was applied to shareholders and used to calculate the promised dividend payout ratios.FindingsThis rule constitutes a natural experiment from which modern organisations could learn to implement the most relevant profit-allocation schemes given their CSR strategy. The authors propose calculating a promised payout ratio that would allow scholars to empirically examine the rule and its effects and provide accurate recommendations to these organisations.Research limitations/implicationsThis mechanism allows the study of profit allocations made to stakeholders (not limited to shareholders or employees like it is usually done). The promised payout ratio makes future quantitative investigations possible.Practical implicationsModern organisations could use the CSR mechanism to allocate profits continuously in formats that would best fit their strategy and environment.Originality/valueTo the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first article to examine the statutory rule of profit allocation per se, which proposes a new methodology to calculate payout ratios promised by the rule. The idea is to investigate their impact and provide recommendations for modern organisations to adapt.

Journal

Journal of Management History – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jan 16, 2023

Keywords: Profit allocation; Corporate governance; Historical methods; Business and organisational history; Research methodology; France

References

  • Private contracting, law and finance
    Acheson, G.; Campbell, G.; Turner, J.
  • Payout policy
    Allen, F.; Michaely, R.; Constantinides, G.; Harris, M.; Stulz, R.
  • Why resource‐based theory's model of profit appropriation must incorporate a stakeholder perspective
    Barney, J.B.
  • Report on profit sharing and copartnership in the United Kingdom
  • Statutory rule of profit allocation: what did pre-WWI Paris-listed firms promise to pay out to their shareholders?
    Bonhoure, E.
  • Did French stock markets support firms of the second industrial revolution?
    Bonhoure, E.; Le Bris, D.
  • Management and organisational history
    Booth, C.; Rowlinson, M.
  • Contextual analysis and newspaper archives in management history research
    Bowie, D.
  • Substitutes for legal protection: corporate governance and dividends in Victorian Britain
    Campbell, G.; Turner, J.
  • A naturological approach to corporate governance: an extension of the Frederick model of corporation-community relationships
    Cassill, D.L.; Hill, R.P.
  • Professionalism and performance incentives in accounting firms
    Coram, P.J.; Robinson, M.J.
  • Catering and dividend policy: evidence from The Netherlands over the twentieth century
    De Jong, A.; Fliers, P.; van Beusichem, H.
  • Moral re-armament: toward a better understanding of the society-corporation relationship before the emergence of ‘corporate social responsibility
    Dent, E.; Randall, C.
  • Theories of business behaviour and the distribution of surplus profits
    Dunning, J.H.; Stilwell, F.J.B.
  • The new story of business: towards a more responsible capitalism
    Freeman, R.E.
  • The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits
    Friedman, M.
  • Who responds to whom and for what? A grounded theory analysis of social responsibility in the 1857 Frankfurt bienfaisance congress
    Good, J.; Husted, B.; Palomares-Aguirre, I.; Garcia-de-la-Torre, C.
  • Capital structure and corporate performance in late imperial Russia
    Gregg, A.; Nafziger, S.
  • Reimagining profits and stakeholder capital to address tensions among stakeholders
    Hatherly, D.; Mitchell, R.K.; Mitchell, J.R.; Lee, J.H.
  • Profit sharing in British industry, 1865–1913
    Hatton, T.J.
  • Asymétries d’information, coûts de mandat et financement des entreprises françaises (1890-1936)
    Hautcoeur, P.-C.
  • Le marché financier français au XIXe siècle – Volume 1: récit. In sorbonensia oeconomica
    Hautcoeur, P.-C.
  • The Paris financial market in the nineteenth century: complementarities and competition in microstructures 1
    Hautcoeur, P.-C.; Riva, A.
  • Data for financial history database, Paris School of Economics, version 04/21/2021
    Hautcoeur, P.C.; Riva, A.
  • Corporate governance
    Herrigel, G.; Jones, G.; Zeitlin, J.
  • Une histoire du concept d’entreprise
    Hilaire, J.
  • Shareholder voting rights in early american corporations
    Hilt, E.
  • Value maximisation, stakeholder theory and the corporate objective function
    Jensen, M.C.
  • Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure
    Jensen, M.; Meckling, W.
  • Does geography matter? Firm location and corporate payout policy
    John, K.; Knyazeva, A.; Knyazeva, D.
  • Financial participation in Finland: incidence and determinants
    Jones, D.; Kalmi, P.; Kato, T.; Mäkinen, M.
  • Trading forward: the Paris bourse in the nineteenth century
    Lagneau-Ymonet, P.; Riva, A.
  • Un précurseur de la normalisation comptable: Brochant de villiers et la comptabilité des sociétés anonymes, 1772-1840
    Lemarchand, Y.
  • Falsifications et manipulations comptables: la mesure du profit comme enjeu social, 1856-1918
    Lemarchand, Y.; Praquin, N.
  • Business culture
    Lipartito, K.; Jones, G.; Zeitlin, J.
  • Where does an organisation's responsibility end?
    McGahan, A.
  • The British experience of profit-sharing
    Matthews, D.
  • Labor and labor organizations
    Metcalf, H.C.; Stockton, F.T.
  • Investor protection, taxation and dividend policy: Long-run evidence, 1838–2012
    Moortgat, L.; Annaert, J.; Deloof, M.
  • To thine shareholders be true? Linking large corporate ownership to firms' use of commitment human resource practices
    Mullins, F.; Brandes, P.; Dharwadkar, R.
  • The evolution of the rules and regulations of the first emerging markets: the London, New York and Paris stock exchanges, 1792–1914
    Neal, L.; Davis, L.
  • L’entreprise, objet d’intérêt
    Notat, N.; Senard, J.D.
  • Stakeholder theory: the state of the art
    Parmar, B.L.; Freeman, R.E.; Harrison, J.S.; Wicks, A.C.; Purnell, L.; de Colle, S.
  • Profit-sharing and autocracy: the case of JT and J. Taylor of batley, woollen manufacturers, 1892-1966
    Pollard, S.; Turner, R.
  • Creating shared value: how to reinvent capitalism and unleash a wave of innovation and growth
    Porter, M.; Kramer, M.
  • The great reversals: the politics of financial development in the twentieth century
    Rajan, R.; Zingales, L.
  • Being done with Milton Friedman
    Robé, J.P.
  • Le temps du monde de l’entreprise: globalisation et mutation du système juridique
    Robé, J.P.
  • Finding a turn in Canadian management through archival sources
    Russell, J.
  • Value, rent and profit: a stakeholder resource‐based theory
    Stoelhorst, J.W.
  • Corpus linguistics, newspaper archives and historical research methods
    Tumbe, C.
  • The bonus question in India: from ex gratia payment to industrial claim
    Van den Bogaert, M.J.
  • Nurturing the historic turn: ‘history as theory’ versus ‘history as method
    Van Lent, W.; Durepos, G.