Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

How fakes make it through: the role of review features versus consumer characteristics

How fakes make it through: the role of review features versus consumer characteristics This study aims to examine how characteristics of an online review and a consumer reading the review influence the probability that the consumer will assess the review as authentic (real) or inauthentic (fake). This study further examines the specific factors that increase or decrease a consumer’s ability to detect a review’s authenticity and reasons a consumer makes these authenticity assessments.Design/methodology/approachHypothesized relationships were tested using an online experiment of over 400 respondents who collectively provided 3,224 authenticity assessments along with 3,181 written self-report reasons for assessing a review as authentic or inauthentic.FindingsThe findings indicate that specific combinations of factors including review valence, length, readability, type of content and consumer personality traits and demographics lead to systematic bias in assessing review authenticity. Using qualitative analysis, this paper provided further insight into why consumers are deceived.Research limitations/implicationsThis research showed there are important differences in the way the authenticity assessment process works for positive versus negative reviews and identified factors that can make a fake review hard to spot or a real review hard to believe.Practical implicationsThis research has implications for both consumers and businesses by emphasizing areas of vulnerability for fake information and providing guidance for how to design review systems for improved veracity.Originality/valueThis research is one of the few works that explicates how people assess information authenticity and their consequent assessment accuracy in the context of online reviews. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Consumer Marketing Emerald Publishing

How fakes make it through: the role of review features versus consumer characteristics

Download PDF
15 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/how-fakes-make-it-through-the-role-of-review-features-versus-consumer-M2ecCm0fBx
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
0736-3761
eISSN
0736-3761
DOI
10.1108/jcm-04-2021-4597
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This study aims to examine how characteristics of an online review and a consumer reading the review influence the probability that the consumer will assess the review as authentic (real) or inauthentic (fake). This study further examines the specific factors that increase or decrease a consumer’s ability to detect a review’s authenticity and reasons a consumer makes these authenticity assessments.Design/methodology/approachHypothesized relationships were tested using an online experiment of over 400 respondents who collectively provided 3,224 authenticity assessments along with 3,181 written self-report reasons for assessing a review as authentic or inauthentic.FindingsThe findings indicate that specific combinations of factors including review valence, length, readability, type of content and consumer personality traits and demographics lead to systematic bias in assessing review authenticity. Using qualitative analysis, this paper provided further insight into why consumers are deceived.Research limitations/implicationsThis research showed there are important differences in the way the authenticity assessment process works for positive versus negative reviews and identified factors that can make a fake review hard to spot or a real review hard to believe.Practical implicationsThis research has implications for both consumers and businesses by emphasizing areas of vulnerability for fake information and providing guidance for how to design review systems for improved veracity.Originality/valueThis research is one of the few works that explicates how people assess information authenticity and their consequent assessment accuracy in the context of online reviews.

Journal

Journal of Consumer Marketing – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jul 25, 2022

Keywords: Online review; Fake review; Deception detection; Authenticity; Negative review

References

  • Online review helpfulness: role of qualitative factors
    Agnihotri, A.; Bhattacharya, S.
  • A positivity bias in written and spoken English and its moderation by personality and gender
    Augustine, A.A.; Mehl, M.R.; Larsen, R.J.
  • Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: price premiums and buyer behavior
    Ba, S.; Pavlou, P.A.
  • Using supervised learning to classify authentic and fake online reviews
    Banerjee, S.; Chua, A.Y.K.; Kim, J.-J.
  • How critical are critical reviews? The box office effects of film critics, star power, and budgets
    Basuroy, S.; Chatterjee, S.; Ravid, S.A.
  • Facebook’s fake news experiment backfires
  • Some exploration in initial interaction and beyond: toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication
    Berger, C.R.; Calabrese, R.J.
  • TripAdvisor denies claims one in three reviews ‘faked’
    Birchall, G.
  • Accuracy of deception judgments
    Bond, C.F.; DePaulo, B.M.
  • Avoiding the dark side of positive online consumer reviews: enhancing reviews' usefulness for high risk-averse travelers
    Casaló, L.V.; Flavián, C.; Guinalíu, M.; Ekinci, Y.
  • Temporal contiguity and negativity bias in the impact of online word of mouth
    Chen, Z.; Lurie, N.H.
  • Social influence's impact on reader perceptions of online reviews
    Cheng, Y.-H.; Ho, H.-Y.
  • The impact of electronic word-of-mouth: the adoption of online opinions in online customer communities
    Cheung, C.M.; Lee, M.K.; Rabjohn, N.
  • Is this review believable? A study of factors affecting the credibility of online consumer reviews from an ELM perspective
    Cheung, C.M.-Y.; Sia, C.; Kuan, K.
  • The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book reviews
    Chevalier, J.A.; Mayzlin, D.
  • Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: a new look at an old issue
    Enders, C.K.; Tofighi, D.
  • Personality factors in human deception detection: comparing human to machine performance
    Enos, F.; Benus, S.; Cautin, R.; Graciarena, M.; Hirschberg, J.; Shriberg, E.
  • Empath: understanding topic signals in large-scale text
    Fast, E.; Chen, B.; Bernstein, M.
  • The role of emotions for the perceived usefulness in online customer reviews
    Felbermayr, A.; Nanopoulos, A.
  • E-WOM and accommodation: an analysis of the factors that influence travelers’ adoption of information from online reviews
    Filieri, R.; McLeay, F.
  • Commercial markets as communication markets: uncertainty reduction through mediated information exchange in online auctions
    Flanagin, A.J.
  • Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: mining text and reviewer characteristics
    Ghose, A.; Ipeirotis, P.G.
  • In search of a gold standard in studies of deception
    Gokhman, S.; Hancock, J.T.; Prabhu, P.; Ott, M.; Cardie, C.
  • Looking without seeing: understanding unsophisticated consumers’ success and failure to detect internet deception
    Grazioli, S.; Wang, A.
  • On lying and being lied to: a linguistic analysis of deception in computer mediated communication
    Hancock, J.T.; Curry, L.E.; Goorha, S.; Woodworth, M.
  • Reconciling conflicting results derived from experimental and survey results studies of attitude change
    Holvand, C.L.
  • Comparison of population-averaged and subject-specific approaches for analyzing repeated binary outcomes
    Hu, F.B.; Goldberg, J.; Hedeker, D.; Flay, B.R.; Pentz, M.A.
  • Review spam detection
    Jindal, N.; Liu, B.
  • The big five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives
    John, O.P.; Srivastava, S.; Pervin, L.A.; John, O.P.
  • Digital marketing: a framework, review and research agenda
    Kannan, P.K.; Li, H.A.
  • Negativity in evaluations
    Kanouse, D.E.; Hanson, L.R.; Jones, E.E.
  • Deep semantic frame-based deceptive opinion spam analysis
    Kim, S.; Chang, H.; Lee, S.; Yu, M.; Kang, J.
  • 20-F: how people compose and detect insincere product reviews: combining experimental and automated-text-analysis approaches
    Kronrod, A.; Lee, J.; Gordeliy, I.
  • Credibility of online reviews and initial trust: the roles of reviewer's identity and review valence
    Kusumasondjaja, S.; Shanka, T.; Marchegiani, C.
  • Modeling correlated binary outcomes with time-dependent covariates
    Lalonde, T.L.; Nguyen, A.Q.; Yin, J.; Irimata, K.; Wilson, J.R.
  • Peer to peer lending: the relationship between language features, trustworthiness, and persuasion success
    Larrimore, L.; Jiang, L.; Larrimore, J.; Markowitz, D.; Gorski, S.
  • Truth-default theory (TDT): a theory of human deception and deception detection
    Levine, T.R.
  • Accuracy in detecting truths and lies: documenting the ‘veracity effect’
    Levine, T.R.; Park, H.S.; McCornack, S.A.
  • Birds of a feather: how personality influences blog writing and reading
    Li, J.; Chignell, M.
  • Fake it till you make it: reputation, competition, and yelp review fraud
    Luca, M.; Zervas, G.
  • Examining biased assimilation of brand-related online reviews
    Mafael, A.; Gottschalk, S.; Kreis, H.
  • My words for your pizza: an analysis of persuasive narratives in online crowdfunding
    Majumdar, A.; Bose, I.
  • Promotional reviews: an empirical investigation of online review manipulation
    Mayzlin, D.; Dover, Y.; Chevalier, J.
  • Spotting fake reviewer groups in consumer reviews
    Mukherjee, A.; Liu, B.; Glance, N.
  • Malicious practice of fake reviews: experimental insight into the potential of contextual indicators in assisting consumers to detect deceptive opinion spam
    Munzel, A.
  • Predicting the helpfulness of online reviews using a scripts-enriched text regression model
    Ngo-Ye, T.; Sinha, A.; Sen, A.
  • Estimating the prevalence of deception in online review communities
    Ott, M.; Cardie, C.; Hancock, J.T.
  • Negative deceptive opinion spam
    Ott, M.; Cardie, C.; Hancock, J.T.
  • Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination
    Ott, M.; Choi, Y.; Cardie, C.; Hancock, J.T.
  • Akaike's information criterion in generalized estimating equations
    Pan, W.
  • How much can you trust online information? Cues for perceived trustworthiness of consumer-generated online information
    Pan, L.; Chiou, J.-S.
  • Information direction, website reputation and eWOM effect: a moderating role of product type
    Park, C.; Lee, T.
  • The nature and role of feedback text comments in online marketplaces: implications for trust building, price premiums, and seller differentiation
    Pavlou, P.A.; Dimoka, A.
  • Linguistic styles: language use as an individual difference
    Pennebaker, J.W.; King, L.A.
  • The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion
    Petty, R.E.; Cacioppo, J.T.
  • When good WOM hurts and bad WOM gains: the effect of untrustworthy online reviews
    Reimer, T.; Benkenstein, M.
  • Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the web
    Sen, S.; Lerman, D.
  • Analyzing topic differences, writing quality, and rhetorical context in college students’ essays using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count
    Taraban, R.; Khaleel, A.
  • Tell-tale words: linguistic cues used to infer the expertise of online medical advice
    Toma, C.L.; D’Angelo, J.D.
  • What lies beneath: the linguistic traces of deception in online dating profiles
    Toma, C.L.; Hancock, J.T.
  • Beyond accuracy: what data quality means to data consumers
    Wang, R.Y.; Strong, D.M.
  • Believe it or not: factors influencing credibility on the web
    Wathen, C.N.; Burkell, J.A.
  • In Facebook’s effort to fight fake news, human fact-checkers struggle to keep up
    Wells, G.; Alpert, L.I.
  • Product-related deception in e-commerce: a theoretical perspective
    Xiao, B.; Benbasat, I.
  • Emotions within online reviews and their influence on product attitudes in Austria, USA and Thailand
    Zablocki, A.; Makri, K.; Houston, M.
  • The effects of prior reviews on perceived review helpfulness: a configuration perspective
    Zhu, Y.; Liu, M.; Zeng, X.; Huang, P.
  • Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception
    Zuckerman, M.; DePaulo, B.M.; Rosenthal, R.; Berkowitz, L.