Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

How does contract completeness affect tacit knowledge acquisition?

How does contract completeness affect tacit knowledge acquisition? This study aims to empirically investigate the role of contracts in tacit knowledge acquisition in research and development (R&D) alliances. By combining the perspectives of sensemaking and transaction cost economics (TCE), this study proposes a model about the mechanisms through which shared goals and contract completeness jointly affect tacit knowledge acquisition.Design/methodology/approachThis study adopted a quantitative design and used the questionnaire survey method to collect data. The authors finally collected data on 196 R&D alliance samples in China. Multiple regression analysis was used to test the hypotheses.FindingsThere is strong empirical support that contract completeness has a positive effect on shared goals and that shared goals have a positive effect on tacit knowledge acquisition. Meanwhile, contract completeness weakens the positive effect of shared goals on tacit knowledge acquisition. Therefore, this study reveals that contract completeness has an inverted U-shaped effect on tacit knowledge acquisition.Practical implicationsThe findings suggest that managers should consider both the psychological and rational effects of contract governance simultaneously, thus recognizing the importance of a moderate level of contract completeness for tacit knowledge acquisition in R&D alliances.Originality/valueThis study enhances the current understanding of contract governance by integrating the sensemaking and TCE perspectives. The findings provide a possible explanation of how contracts affect tacit knowledge acquisition in R&D alliances. The authors expand the research on contract governance and alliance knowledge acquisition by revealing the inverted U-shaped relationship between contract governance and tacit knowledge acquisition. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Knowledge Management Emerald Publishing

How does contract completeness affect tacit knowledge acquisition?

Download PDF
17 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/how-does-contract-completeness-affect-tacit-knowledge-acquisition-PD7r6AoQa6
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
© Emerald Publishing Limited
ISSN
1367-3270
eISSN
1367-3270
DOI
10.1108/jkm-02-2020-0130
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This study aims to empirically investigate the role of contracts in tacit knowledge acquisition in research and development (R&D) alliances. By combining the perspectives of sensemaking and transaction cost economics (TCE), this study proposes a model about the mechanisms through which shared goals and contract completeness jointly affect tacit knowledge acquisition.Design/methodology/approachThis study adopted a quantitative design and used the questionnaire survey method to collect data. The authors finally collected data on 196 R&D alliance samples in China. Multiple regression analysis was used to test the hypotheses.FindingsThere is strong empirical support that contract completeness has a positive effect on shared goals and that shared goals have a positive effect on tacit knowledge acquisition. Meanwhile, contract completeness weakens the positive effect of shared goals on tacit knowledge acquisition. Therefore, this study reveals that contract completeness has an inverted U-shaped effect on tacit knowledge acquisition.Practical implicationsThe findings suggest that managers should consider both the psychological and rational effects of contract governance simultaneously, thus recognizing the importance of a moderate level of contract completeness for tacit knowledge acquisition in R&D alliances.Originality/valueThis study enhances the current understanding of contract governance by integrating the sensemaking and TCE perspectives. The findings provide a possible explanation of how contracts affect tacit knowledge acquisition in R&D alliances. The authors expand the research on contract governance and alliance knowledge acquisition by revealing the inverted U-shaped relationship between contract governance and tacit knowledge acquisition.

Journal

Journal of Knowledge Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: Jun 21, 2021

Keywords: TCE perspective; Sensemaking perspective; Contract completeness; Shared goals; Tacit knowledge acquisition

References

  • Locus of uncertainty and the relationship between contractual and relational governance in cross-border inter-firm relationships
    Abdi, M.; Aulakh, P.S.
  • A model for assessment of uncertainty in tacit knowledge acquisition
    Akhavan, P.; Shahabipour, A.; Hosnavi, R.
  • Contracts, negotiation, and learning: an examination of termination provisions
    Ariño, A.; Reuer, J.J.; Mayer, K.J.; Jané, J.
  • Contract governance and buyer-supplier conflict: the moderating role of institutions
    Bai, X.; Sheng, S.B.; Li, J.J.
  • Cross-country findings on tacit knowledge sharing: evidence from the Brazilian and Indonesian IT workers
    Borges, R.; Bernardi, M.; Petrin, R.
  • Uncertainty, opportunism, and governance: the effects of volatility and ambiguity on formal and relational contracting
    Carson, S.J.; Madhok, A.; Wu, T.
  • Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing
    Chow, W.S.; Chan, L.S.
  • Contract research and high-tech alliances: vistas for future studies
    de Jong, G.; Woolthuis, R.J.A.K.
  • Sense-making theory and practice: an overview of user interests in knowledge seeking and use
    Dervin, B.
  • Managing tacit and explicit knowledge transfer in IJVs: the role of relational embeddedness and the impact on performance
    Dhanaraj, C.; Lyles, M.A.; Steensma, H.K.; Tihanyi, L.
  • Toward an integrative perspective on alliance governance: connecting contract design, trust dynamics, and contract application
    Faems, D.; Janssens, M.; Madhok, A.; Van Looy, B.
  • Tacit knowledge transfer and the knowledge disconnect
    Foos, T.; Schum, G.; Rothenberg, S.
  • Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
    Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F.
  • Evaluating the role of social Capital, tacit knowledge sharing, knowledge quality and reciprocity in determining innovation capability of an organization
    Ganguly, A.; Talukdar, A.; Chatterijee, D.
  • Explicating the influence of shared goals and hope on knowledge sharing and knowledge creation in an emerging economic context
    Goswami, A.K.; Agrawal, R.K.
  • Thinking about u: theorizing and testing u- and inverted u-shaped relationships in strategy research
    Haans, R.F.J.; Pieters, C.; He, Z.L.
  • Curvilinear relationship between intra-team trust and team innovation: the moderating role of task complexity
    Hendarsjah, H.; Susanto, E.; Sugianto, B.R.L.; Handoko, T.H.
  • Knowledge transfer and international joint ventures: the case of NUMMI and general motors
    Inkpen, A.C.
  • Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer
    Inkpen, A.C.; Tsang, E.W.K.
  • Trust, calculation, and inter- organizational learning of tacit knowledge: an organizational roles perspective
    Janowicz-Panjaitan, M.; Noorderhaven, N.G.
  • The impacts of corporate governance mechanisms on knowledge sharing and supply chain performance
    Jen, C.T.; Hu, J.Y.; Zheng, J.; Xiao, L.L.
  • Organizational ambidexterity through global strategic partnerships: a cognitive computing perspective
    Kaur, S.; Gupta, S.; Singh, S.K.; Perano, M.
  • Culture and international alliance negotiations: a sensemaking perspective
    Kumar, R.; Patriotta, G.
  • Relational mechanisms, formal contracts, and local knowledge acquisition by international subsidiaries
    Li, J.J.; Poppo, L.; Zhou, K.Z.
  • Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs
    Lindell, M.K.; Whitney, D.J.
  • Knowledge transfer in buyer-supplier relationships: the role of transactional and relational governance mechanisms
    Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Shi, L.H.; Liu, T.
  • The role of trust and contractual safeguards on cooperation in non-equity alliances
    Lui, S.S.; Ngo, H.Y.
  • Shadow of the contract: how contract structure shapes interfirm dispute resolution
    Lumineau, F.; Malhotra, D.
  • An organizational learning perspective on the contracting process
    Lumineau, F.; Fréchet, M.; Puthod, D.
  • A sensemaking perspective on coopetition
    Lundgren-Henriksson, E.L.; Kock, S.
  • Contract, cooperation, and performance in international joint ventures
    Luo, Y.D.
  • Transactional characteristics, institutional environment and joint venture contracts
    Luo, Y.D.
  • Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities
    McEvily, B.; Marcus, A.
  • Social networks: effects of social capital on firm innovation
    Molina-Morales, F.X.; Martinez-Fernandez, M.T.
  • The effects of organizational culture and commitment on employee innovation: evidence from vietnam’s IT industry
    Nguyen, V.T.; Siengthai, S.; Swierczek, F.; Bamel, U.K.
  • Learning and innovation in international strategic alliance: an empirical test of the role of trust and tacitness
    Nielsen, B.B.; Nielsen, S.
  • Joint problem solving and organizational learning capacity in new product innovation
    Ning, L.T.; Li, J.
  • The knowledge-creating company
    Nonaka, I.; Takeuchi, H.
  • The integration between knowledge management and dynamic capabilities in agile organizations
    Oliva, F.L.; Couto, M.H.G.; Santos, R.F.; Bresciani, S.
  • Innovation in the main brazilian business sectors: characteristics, types and comparison of innovation
    Oliva, F.L.; Semensato, B.I.; Prioste, D.B.; Winandy, E.J.L.
  • Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms
    Osterloh, M.; Frey, B.S.
  • Corporate language proficiency in reverse knowledge transfer: a moderated mediation model of shared vision and communication frequency
    Peltokorpi, V.; Yamao, S.
  • Self-report in organizational research
    Podsakoff, P.M.; Organ, D.W.
  • Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies
    Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.Y.; Podsakoff, N.P.
  • Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements
    Poppo, L.; Zenger, T.
  • Contractual renegotiations in strategic alliances
    Reuer, J.J.; Ariño, A.
  • The double-edged effect of contracts on alliance performance
    Schilke, O.; Lumineau, F.
  • Exploring tacit knowledge transfer and innovation capabilities within the buyer? Supplier collaboration: a literature review
    Sikombe, S.; Phiri, M.A.
  • Top management team shared leadership, market-oriented culture, innovation capability, and firm performance
    Singh, S.K.; Bernardi, P.D.
  • Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance
    Singh, S.K.; Guptab, S.; Bussoc, D.; Kamboj, S.
  • Contract performance in offshore systems development: role of control mechanisms
    Srivastava, S.C.; Teo, T.S.H.
  • Communities, alliances, networks and knowledge in multinational firms: a micro-analytic framework
    Tallman, S.; Chacar, A.S.
  • Social Capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks
    Tsai, W.P.; Ghoshal, S.
  • Coping with problems of understanding in interorganizational relationships: using formalization as a means to make sense
    Vlaar, P.W.L.; Van den Bosch, F.A.J.; Volberda, H.W.
  • The benefits of combining psychology and economics theory in strategy research: the contract’s simultaneous role as safeguard and relationship
    Weber, L.; Mayer, K.J.
  • Designing effective contracts: exploring the influence of framing and expectations
    Weber, L.; Mayer, K.J.
  • Organizing and the process of sensemaking
    Weick, K.E.; Sutcliffe, K.M.; Obstfeld, D.
  • Strategizing, economizing, and economic organization
    Williamson, O.E.
  • Social Capital, behavioural control, and tacit knowledge sharing- A multi-informant design
    Yang, S.C.; Farn, C.K.
  • When do formal control and trust matter? a context- based analysis of the effects on marketing channel relationships in China
    Yang, Z.L.; Zhou, C.; Jiang, L.
  • Suppressing partner opportunism in emerging markets: contextualizing institutional forces in supply chain management
    Yang, D.F.; Sheng, S.B.; Wu, S.L.; Zhou, K.Z.
  • Different roles of control mechanisms in buyer-supplier conflict: an empirical study from China
    Yang, W.; Gao, Y.; Li, Y.; Shen, H.; Zheng, S.Y.
  • Social Capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms
    Yli-Renko, H.; Autio, E.; Sapienza, H.J.
  • Governing inter-firm knowledge transfer in the chinese market: the interplay of formal and informal mechanisms
    Zhang, Q.Y.; Zhou, K.Z.
  • Are relational ties always good for knowledge acquisition? Buyer-supplier exchanges in China
    Zhou, K.Z.; Zhang, Q.Y.; Sheng, S.B.; Xie, E.; Bao, Y.Q.