Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Hormesis: an evolutionary “predict and prepare” survival mechanism

Hormesis: an evolutionary “predict and prepare” survival mechanism Purpose – Can managers prepare their organisations for the unexpected and unforeseeable? The purpose of this paper is to argue that organisations that endure and survive a serious disruption to homeostasis may as a consequence be better equipped to survive further and more devastating attacks. Design/methodology/approach – This hypothesis is based on a naturally occurring biological survival mechanism termed hormesis. Hormesis describes a controversial biological phenomenon where the organism overcompensates and adaptation occurs after exposure to low doses of toxins. Hormesis protects the organism against subsequent repeat exposure to more lethal doses. Findings – Hormetic effects may occur in an organisation just as it does in a biological entity following exposure to a life‐threatening disruption, inoculating it against potentially more lethal recurrences. Disruption in an organisational context may include negative environmental impacts, incidences of management incompetence, or consequences of competitive hostilities. It is argued that lessons can be applied from examples of biological hormesis, particularly lessons related to the hormetic recovery stages of overcompensation and adaptation as part of an evolutionary survival mechanism for organisations. Practical implications – Organisational hormesis may have the potential to produce growth and advancement that would not normally occur under ordinary circumstances. Hormesis demonstrates more than a step in an organisational learning process as it conveys an adaptive response designed to prevent future disruptions. Hormesis is a healing process with foresight, “designed” with the intent of increasing organisational fitness within a rapidly changing environment. It has been “designed” with the knowledge that the environment may yet dispense an even greater challenge, still to be met. In this respect the hormetic process defies evolutionary dogma which claims that evolutionary processes are blind that evolution can only react to and compensate for past pressure rather than being able to predict and prepare for future threats. After recovery from disruption, managers may, for cost cutting and other expedient purposes, cease recovery or restructuring activities. This action may unwittingly interfere with the hormetic overcompensation stage, thereby interfering with evolutionary adaptation processes. As a consequence, the organisation's ability to repel more severe disruptions may be compromised. Some firms are prematurely liquidated or downsized before they can develop hormetic response mechanisms. As demonstrated by the Xerox example, liquidation in 2000 would have been a catastrophic mistake. Originality/value – Provides a post‐mortem examination searching for possible explanations for organisational phenomena that have as yet been adequately explained. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Leadership & Organization Development Journal Emerald Publishing

Hormesis: an evolutionary “predict and prepare” survival mechanism

Download PDF
15 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/hormesis-an-evolutionary-predict-and-prepare-survival-mechanism-qxosEfmYu6
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
0143-7739
DOI
10.1108/01437730510633737
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – Can managers prepare their organisations for the unexpected and unforeseeable? The purpose of this paper is to argue that organisations that endure and survive a serious disruption to homeostasis may as a consequence be better equipped to survive further and more devastating attacks. Design/methodology/approach – This hypothesis is based on a naturally occurring biological survival mechanism termed hormesis. Hormesis describes a controversial biological phenomenon where the organism overcompensates and adaptation occurs after exposure to low doses of toxins. Hormesis protects the organism against subsequent repeat exposure to more lethal doses. Findings – Hormetic effects may occur in an organisation just as it does in a biological entity following exposure to a life‐threatening disruption, inoculating it against potentially more lethal recurrences. Disruption in an organisational context may include negative environmental impacts, incidences of management incompetence, or consequences of competitive hostilities. It is argued that lessons can be applied from examples of biological hormesis, particularly lessons related to the hormetic recovery stages of overcompensation and adaptation as part of an evolutionary survival mechanism for organisations. Practical implications – Organisational hormesis may have the potential to produce growth and advancement that would not normally occur under ordinary circumstances. Hormesis demonstrates more than a step in an organisational learning process as it conveys an adaptive response designed to prevent future disruptions. Hormesis is a healing process with foresight, “designed” with the intent of increasing organisational fitness within a rapidly changing environment. It has been “designed” with the knowledge that the environment may yet dispense an even greater challenge, still to be met. In this respect the hormetic process defies evolutionary dogma which claims that evolutionary processes are blind that evolution can only react to and compensate for past pressure rather than being able to predict and prepare for future threats. After recovery from disruption, managers may, for cost cutting and other expedient purposes, cease recovery or restructuring activities. This action may unwittingly interfere with the hormetic overcompensation stage, thereby interfering with evolutionary adaptation processes. As a consequence, the organisation's ability to repel more severe disruptions may be compromised. Some firms are prematurely liquidated or downsized before they can develop hormetic response mechanisms. As demonstrated by the Xerox example, liquidation in 2000 would have been a catastrophic mistake. Originality/value – Provides a post‐mortem examination searching for possible explanations for organisational phenomena that have as yet been adequately explained.

Journal

Leadership & Organization Development Journal – Emerald Publishing

Published: Dec 1, 2005

Keywords: Organizational change; Corporate strategy; Learning organizations

References

  • A little poison can be good for you
    Anonymous
  • The Lucifer Principle: A Scientific Expedition into the Forces of History
    Bloom, H.
  • The dirty half dozen: America's worst boards
    Boyle, M.
  • Digital deals pit Xerox against Kodak
    Boyle, M.
  • Hormesis: a generalizable and unifying hypothesis
    Calabrese, E.J.; Baldwin, L.A.
  • Multiple stressors in Caenorhabditis elegans induce stress hormesis and extended longevity
    Cypser, J.R.; Johnson, T.E.
  • Understanding Management
    Daft, R.; Marcic, D.
  • The Blind Watchmaker
    Dawkins, R.
  • Situations for innovation management: towards a contingency model
    Drejer, A.
  • I have a cast‐iron stomach
    Florian, E.
  • Perrier finds mystique hard to restore
    Freedman, A.M.
  • Perrier expands North American recall to rest of globe
    Freedman, A.M.; King, T.R.
  • Building a learning organization
    Garvin, D.A.
  • The Growth of the Mind and the Endangered Origins of Intelligence
    Greenspan, S.I.
  • Evolution and revolution as organizations grow
    Greiner, L.E.
  • Management Mistakes and Successes
    Hartley, R.F.
  • The Fortune Global 500
    Hjelt, P.
  • The paper jam from hell
    Kahn, J.; Schlosser, J.
  • Organizational analogy: a comparison of organismic and social contract models
    Keeley, M.
  • Phenobarbital at low doses exerts hormesis in rat hepatocarcinogenesis by reducing oxidative DNA damage, altering cell proliferation, apoptosis and gene expression
    Kinoshita, A.; Wanibuchi, H.; Morimura, K.; Wei, M.; Imaoka, S.; Funae, Y.; Fukushima, S.
  • Hormesis: implications for public policy regarding toxicants
    Lave, L.B.
  • Camera not so obscura
    Lewis, P.
  • The Essential Guide to Managing Corporate Crises: A Step‐by‐Step Handbook for Surviving Major Catastrophes
    Mitroff, I.J.; Pearson, C.M.; Harrington, L.K.
  • The accidental CEO
    Morris, B.
  • Termites, group behaviour and the loss of innovation: conformity rules!
    Pech, R.J.
  • Biological responses to low doses of ionizing radiation: detriment versus hormesis – Part 2. Dose responses of organisms
    Pollycove, M.; Feinendegen, L.E.
  • Becoming a Learning Organization: Beyond the Learning Curve
    Swieringa, J.; Wierdsma, A.
  • Becoming Human: Evolution and Human Uniqueness
    Tattersall, I.
  • Commentary on white paper the future of hormesis: where do we go from here? Edward J Calabrese
    Thomassen, D.G.
  • Interpreting corporate transformation through failure
    Thorne, M.L.
  • Search and destroy
    Vogelstein, F.; Lewis, P.
  • Linking organisational learning to organisational performance and success: Singapore case studies
    Yeo, R.
  • Big business: how the economic system grows and evolves like a living organism – what will become of the small retailer?
    Young, A.