Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
W. Lindsay, L. Murphy, Gordon Smith, Daniel Murphy, Zoe Edwards, Chris Chittock, A. Grieve, Steven Young (2004)
The Dynamic Risk Assessment and Management System: An Assessment of Immediate Risk of Violence for Individuals with Offending and Challenging BehaviourJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17
N. Gray, Suzanne Fitzgerald, John Taylor, M. Macculloch, R. Snowden (2007)
Predicting future reconviction in offenders with intellectual disabilities: the predictive efficacy of VRAG, PCL-SV, and the HCR-20.Psychological assessment, 19 4
A. Tengström, S. Hodgins, R. Müller-Isberner, D. Jöckel, R. Freese, Kemal Özokyay, Jens Sommer (2006)
Predicting Violent and Antisocial Behavior in Hospital Using the HCR-20: The Effect of Diagnoses on Predictive AccuracyInternational Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 5
D. Boer, S. Tough, James Haaven (2004)
Assessment of Risk Manageability of Intellectually Disabled Sex OffendersJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17
D. McMillan, R. Hastings, J. Coldwell (2004)
Clinical and Actuarial Prediction of Physical Violence in a Forensic Intellectual Disability Hospital: A Longitudinal StudyJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17
Robert McGrath, J. Livingston, Gail Falk (2007)
A structured method of assessing dynamic risk factors among sexual abusers with intellectual disabilities.American journal of mental retardation : AJMR, 112 3
Rachael Lofthouse, W. Lindsay, V. Totsika, R. Hastings, D. Boer, James Haaven (2013)
Prospective dynamic assessment of risk of sexual reoffending in individuals with an intellectual disability and a history of sexual offending behaviour.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID, 26 5
W. Lindsay, N. Beail (2004)
Risk Assessment: Actuarial Prediction and Clinical Judgement of Offending Incidents and Behaviour for Intellectual Disability ServicesJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17
V. Quinsey, A. Book, T. Skilling (2004)
A Follow‐up of Deinstitutionalized Men with Intellectual Disabilities and Histories of Antisocial BehaviourJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17
W. Lindsay, R. Hastings, A. Beech (2011)
Forensic research in offenders with intellectual & developmental disabilities 1: prevalence and risk assessmentPsychology, Crime & Law, 17
S. Kay, F. Wolkenfeld, L. Murrill (1988)
Profiles of Aggression among Psychiatric Patients: II. Covariates and PredictorsThe Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 176
V. Quinsey (2008)
Risk Assessment and Management in Community Settings
W. Lindsay, A. Michie, E. Whitefield, V. Martin, A. Grieve, D. Carson (2006)
Response patterns on the questionnaire on attitudes consistent with sexual offending in groups of sex offenders with intellectual disabilitiesJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 19
W. Lindsay, T. Hogue, John Taylor, L. Steptoe, P. Mooney, G. O'brien, S. Johnston, Anne Smith (2008)
Risk Assessment in Offenders With Intellectual DisabilityInternational Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52
Rachael Lofthouse, V. Totsika, Richard Hastings, William Lindsay, Todd Hogue, John Taylor (2014)
How do static and dynamic risk factors work together to predict violent behaviour among offenders with an intellectual disability?Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 58 2
C. Morrissey, T. Hogue, P. Mooney, W. Lindsay, L. Steptoe, John Taylor, S. Johnston (2005)
Applicability, Reliability and Validity of the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised in Offenders with Intellectual Disabilities: Some Initial FindingsInternational Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 4
Purpose – The use of violence risk assessment measures within intellectual disabilities (ID) services is now the norm and a growing target for research. The purpose of this paper is to examine the clinical utility of the historical and clinical factors of the HCR-20 in predicting violence. Design/methodology/approach – The study took place within a national low secure service for adults with ID examining all completed admissions over a six-year period, ( N =22). Clinical records covering the first three months of admission were examined along with historical reports and incident data recorded at three, six, nine and 12 months admission using the Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS). Findings – Significant positive relationship between Historical score and total number of incidents was established. Patients with challenging behaviour less likely to have a previous history of violence, and more likely to be older at first violent incident than patients without challenging behaviour. Incidents involving patients with autism were less severe and those with no additional psychiatric diagnosis were significantly more likely to have substance misuse problems than those with a diagnosis. Originality/value – The study found the Historical section was predictive of violent incidents and whilst the study is too small to draw any firm conclusions, the significant positive relationship between the Historical Score and number of incidents for those without additional diagnosis needs to be investigated further as well as the potential positive clinical impact of using the HCR-20 in routine clinical practice.
Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities – Emerald Publishing
Published: Mar 2, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.