Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Saaty, J. Shang (2011)
An innovative orders-of-magnitude approach to AHP-based mutli-criteria decision making: Prioritizing divergent intangible humane actsEur. J. Oper. Res., 214
E. Fama, K. French (2006)
Profitability, investment and average returnsJournal of Financial Economics, 82
Victoria Juste, L. Lucia-Palacios, Yolanda Polo-Redondo (2009)
Franchise firm entry time influence on long‐term survivalInternational Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 37
O. Okeola, B. Sule (2012)
Evaluation of management alternatives for urban water supply system using Multicriteria Decision AnalysisJournal of King Saud University: Engineering Sciences, 24
Matthias Mahlendorf, Jochen Rehring, Utz Schäffer, E. Wyszomirski (2012)
Influencing foreign subsidiary decisions through headquarter performance measurement systemsManagement Decision, 50
Ali Taslıcalı, S. Ercan (2006)
THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY & THE ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESSES IN MULTICRITERIA DECISION MAKING: A COMPARATIVE STUDYJournal of Aeronautics and Space Technologies, 2
G. Castrogiovanni, James Combs, R. Justis (2006)
Resource Scarcity and Agency Theory Predictions Concerning the Continued Use of Franchising in Multi‐outlet NetworksJournal of Small Business Management, 44
P. Drucker (2016)
The Effective Executive
T. Saaty (2008)
DECISION MAKING WITH THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESSInternational Journal of Services Sciences, 1
G. Martín-Herrán, S. Sigué, G. Zaccour (2011)
Strategic interactions in traditional franchise systems: Are franchisors always better off?Eur. J. Oper. Res., 213
Tatiana Anisimova (2010)
Corporate brand: The company-customer misalignment and its performance implicationsJournal of Brand Management, 17
A. Neely (2005)
The evolution of performance measurement research: Developments in the last decade and a research agenda for the nextInternational Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25
Miles Zachary, A. Mckenny, J. Short, Kelly Davis, Di Wu (2011)
Franchise branding: an organizational identity perspectiveJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39
A. Horenbeek, L. Pintelon (2014)
Development of a maintenance performance measurement framework—using the analytic network process (ANP) for maintenance performance indicator selectionOmega-international Journal of Management Science, 42
F. Rothaermel, M. Hitt, Lloyd Jobe (2006)
Balancing vertical integration and strategic outsourcing: effects on product portfolio, product success, and firm performanceSouthern Medical Journal, 27
Carlos Corona (2008)
Dynamic performance measurement with intangible assetsReview of Accounting Studies, 14
T. Saaty, Luis Vargas (2012)
Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process
M. Mougeot, Florence Naegelen (2011)
Franchise bidding, regulation and investment costsReview of Economic Design, 15
S. Greco, M. Ehrgott, J. Figueira (2005)
Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveysOperations Research and Management Science
Hao-Chen Huang, Mei-Chi Lai, Lee-Hsuan Lin (2011)
Developing strategic measurement and improvement for the biopharmaceutical firm: Using the BSC hierarchyExpert Syst. Appl., 38
V. Wang, C. Lai (2011)
Franchise fee, competition and economic growth☆Economic Modelling, 28
Alexandre Bentes, Jorge Carneiro, J. Silva, H. Kimura (2010)
Multidimensional assessment of organizational performance: Integrating BSC and AHP☆Journal of Business Research, 65
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to study the level of importance existing among the indicators that were previously defined for a Performance Measurement Systems (PMS) and are relative to franchises in Brazil, using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) methodology, together with a series of tests, which are responsible by verifying the degree of reliability, robustness and stability of the parameters used and the results obtained. As a result, the author suggests that the diagnosing of the five delimited indicators have different relevance assigned to them. Design/methodology/approach – This paper reviews extant literatures in Franchise, PMS, Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), in specific the theory about AHP. Findings – The authors found that it was possible justified, for both the relative and the evaluative method, that the I3 was the main point of the system and, as a consequence, be considered as priority when talking about sectorial development of franchises in Brazil. As for the other indicators, even being located in a level lower than I3 , they must be taken into contemplation in these measurements, however, with a relatively inferior importance degree. Practical implications – It was possible to better comprehend which economics and non-economic factors selected have a more predominance in the Brazilian franchise context, according to characteristics of the companies present. Originality/value – The absence of scientific papers that describe the relevance level of the main factors that influence in the Brazilian franchise system.
Business Process Management Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 30, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.