Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Walley, B. Gowland (2004)
Completing the circle: from PD to PDSA.International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services, 17 6
W. Deming (1982)
Out of the Crisis
T. Boland, A. Fowler (2000)
A systems perspective of performance management in public sector organisationsInternational Journal of Public Sector Management, 13
N. Inamdar, R. Kaplan (2002)
Applying the Balanced Scorecard in Healthcare Provider OrganizationsJournal of Healthcare Management, 47
R.G. Carey
Improving Healthcare with Control Charts
Joanne Ritter-Teitel (2002)
Sail smoother with systems thinking.Nursing management, 33 11
J. Abramson, Z. Abramson (1990)
Making sense of dataBiometrics, 46
J. Forrester
Industrial Dynamics
Nataša Rupčić (2002)
The fifth discipline-the art and practice of the learning organisationDrustvena Istrazivanja, 11
Donald Wheeler (2000)
Understanding Variation: The Key to Managing Chaos
Zoe Radnor, B. Lovell (2003)
Defining, Justifying and Implementing the Balanced Scorecard in the National Health ServiceJournal of Medical Marketing, 3
Ronald Moen, L. Provost, Cliff Norman (1996)
The Improvement Guide: A Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational Performance
Richard Norman, R. Gregory (2003)
Paradoxes and Pendulum Swings: Performance Management in New Zealand's Public SectorAustralian Journal of Public Administration, 62
Purpose – The paper seeks to investigate decision‐making processes within hospital improvement activity, to understand how performance measurement systems influence decisions and potentially lead to unsuccessful or unsustainable process changes. Design/methodology/approach – A longitudinal study over a 33‐month period investigates key events, decisions and outcomes at one medium‐sized hospital in the UK. Process improvement events are monitored using process control methods and by direct observation. The authors took a systems perspective of the health‐care processes, ensuring that the impacts of decisions across the health‐care supply chain were appropriately interpreted. Findings – The research uncovers the ways in which measurement systems disguise failed decisions and encourage managers to take a low‐risk approach of “symptomatic relief” when trying to improve performance metrics. This prevents many managers from trying higher risk, sustainable process improvement changes. The behaviour of the health‐care system is not understood by many managers and this leads to poor analysis of problem situations. Practical implications – Measurement using time‐series methodologies, such as statistical process control are vital for a better understanding of the systems impact of changes. Senior managers must also be aware of the behavioural influence of similar performance measurement systems that discourage sustainable improvement. There is a risk that such experiences will tarnish the reputation of performance management as a discipline. Originality/value – Recommends process control measures as a way of creating an organization memory of how decisions affect performance – something that is currently lacking.
International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jan 1, 2006
Keywords: National Health Service; Case studies; Performance measurement (qualtiy); Process management; United Kingdom
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.