Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Hamada's equation, the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002 and the UK Companies Act of 2006 A critique

Hamada's equation, the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002 and the UK Companies Act of 2006 A critique Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to show that Hamada's equation, which is used operationally to evaluate changes in capital structure as a result of changes in financial leverage, is subject to a number of non‐trivial deficiencies. Each of these deficiencies is of sufficient importance to nullify the fundamental purpose of this equation, render its function impossible, and epistemologically contradict its functioning. Moreover, to the extent that it is dependent on the empirically invalid capital asset pricing model (CAPM), Hamada's equation defies basic requirements of sound research methodology. Since it cannot do what it purports to do and is an operational fiction, it cannot assist directors with capital structure valuations in terms of Section 172 of the UK Companies Act of 2006. Further, if used operationally, is likely to contravene Section 807 §1348 of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002. Design/methodology/approach – A secondary survey of Hamada's equation, recent UK and US legislation and the literature of corporate financial management is undertaken in order to examine whether the fundamental purpose, function and functioning of this equation could validly and reliably achieve what it purports to achieve. Findings – The derivation of Hamada's equation assumes perfect competition, yet to achieve its fundamental purpose and its function it is dependent on financial markets being inefficient and imperfectly competitive. Thus, its functioning requires a state that its mathematical derivation negates. Epistemologically, this equation is unsound, and since it is also dependent on an empirically invalid approach to the calculation of the cost of capital, the CAPM, Hamada's equation is an invalid valuation equation. Originality/value – This paper shows that Hamada's equation defies basic requirements of sound research methodology, cannot assist directors with their duties in terms of Section 172 of the UK Companies Act of 2006 with regard to capital structure and financial leverage management, and is in conflict with Section 807 § 1348 of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png International Journal of Law and Management Emerald Publishing

Hamada's equation, the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002 and the UK Companies Act of 2006 A critique

S. Paulo
International Journal of Law and Management , Volume 52 (1): 10 – Feb 2, 2010
Download PDF
10 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/hamada-s-equation-the-sarbanes-oxley-act-of-2002-and-the-uk-companies-NRaWxQM6Um
Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 Emerald Group Publishing Limited. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1754-243X
DOI
10.1108/17542431011018543
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to show that Hamada's equation, which is used operationally to evaluate changes in capital structure as a result of changes in financial leverage, is subject to a number of non‐trivial deficiencies. Each of these deficiencies is of sufficient importance to nullify the fundamental purpose of this equation, render its function impossible, and epistemologically contradict its functioning. Moreover, to the extent that it is dependent on the empirically invalid capital asset pricing model (CAPM), Hamada's equation defies basic requirements of sound research methodology. Since it cannot do what it purports to do and is an operational fiction, it cannot assist directors with capital structure valuations in terms of Section 172 of the UK Companies Act of 2006. Further, if used operationally, is likely to contravene Section 807 §1348 of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002. Design/methodology/approach – A secondary survey of Hamada's equation, recent UK and US legislation and the literature of corporate financial management is undertaken in order to examine whether the fundamental purpose, function and functioning of this equation could validly and reliably achieve what it purports to achieve. Findings – The derivation of Hamada's equation assumes perfect competition, yet to achieve its fundamental purpose and its function it is dependent on financial markets being inefficient and imperfectly competitive. Thus, its functioning requires a state that its mathematical derivation negates. Epistemologically, this equation is unsound, and since it is also dependent on an empirically invalid approach to the calculation of the cost of capital, the CAPM, Hamada's equation is an invalid valuation equation. Originality/value – This paper shows that Hamada's equation defies basic requirements of sound research methodology, cannot assist directors with their duties in terms of Section 172 of the UK Companies Act of 2006 with regard to capital structure and financial leverage management, and is in conflict with Section 807 § 1348 of the Sarbanes‐Oxley Act of 2002.

Journal

International Journal of Law and Management – Emerald Publishing

Published: Feb 2, 2010

Keywords: Corporate finances; Laws and legislation; United Kingdom; United States of America; Gearing; Risk analysis

References

  • Whither finance theory ?
    Arnott, R.D.
  • Estimation of expected return: CAPM v. Fama and French
    Bartholdy, J.; Peare, P.
  • Growth options, beta and the cost of capital
    Bernardo, A.E.; Chowdhry, B.; Goyal, A.
  • Financial Management: Theory and Practice
    Brigham, E.F.; Ehrhardt, M.C.
  • Intermediate Financial Management
    Brigham, E.F.; Gapenski, L.C.
  • Applied Business Research
    Cavana, R.Y.; Delahaye, B.L.; Sekaran, U.
  • Business Research Methods
    Cooper, D.R.; Emory, C.W.
  • Business Research for Decision Making
    Davis, D.
  • An investigation into the return distributions of the South African general equity universe
    de Wet, R.; v.d.M. Smit, E.; Krige, J.D.
  • The CAPM is wanted, dead or alive
    Fama, E.F.; French, K.R.
  • The capital asset pricing model: theory and evidence
    Fama, E.F.; French, K.R.
  • The value premium and the CAPM
    Fama, E.F.; French, K.R.
  • Research Methods in Business Studies
    Ghauri, P.; Gronhaug, K.; Kristianslund, I.
  • Stable betas, size, earnings‐to‐price, book‐to‐market and the validity of the capital asset pricing model
    Guan, L.; Hansen, D.R.; Leikam, S.L.; Shaw, J.
  • A rational pricing explanation for the failure of the CAPM
    Guo, H.
  • Portfolio analysis, market equilibrium and corporation finance
    Hamada, R.S.
  • A test of the CAPM on the Karachi Stock Exchange
    Iqbal, J.; Brooks, R.
  • Tackling the issue of the corporate objective: an analysis of the United Kingdom's ‘enlightened shareholder value approach’
    Keay, A.
  • The conditional CAPM does not explain asset‐pricing anomalies
    Lewellen, J.; Nagel, S.
  • Higgledy Piggledy Growth Again
    Little, A.C.; Rayner, I.M.D.
  • CAPM investors do not get paid for bearing risk: a linear relation does not imply payment for risk
    Markowitz, H.M.
  • Dividend policy, growth and the valuation of shares
    Miller, M.H.; Modigliani, F.
  • The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of the firm
    Modigliani, F.; Miller, M.H.
  • The effect of risk factors on the cost of equity estimation
    Nagel, G.L.; Peterson, D.R.; Prati, R.S.
  • Investment Decisions and Capital Costs
    Porterfield, J.T.S.
  • Research Methods for Business
    Sekaran, U.
  • Financial Management and Policy
    Van Horne, J.C.
  • Dividend policies and common stock prices
    Walter, J.E.