Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Keenan (1995)
Graduate recruitment in Britain: a survey of selection methods used by organizationsJournal of Organizational Behavior, 16
V. Shackleton, S. Newell (1994)
European Management Selection Methods: A Comparison of Five CountriesInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2
J. Barclay (1999)
Employee selection: a question of structurePersonnel Review, 28
J.R. McBride
Innovations in computer‐based ability testing: promise, problems and perils
Association of Graduate Recruiters
The AGR Salaries and Vacancies Survey
S. Bevan, J. Fryatt
Employee Selection in the UK
I. Beardwell, L. Holden, T. Claydon
Human Resource Management
D. Steiner, S. Gilliland (1996)
Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in France and the United StatesJournal of Applied Psychology, 81
T. Garavan, M. Morley (1998)
Graduate assessment centres: An empirical investigation of effectiveness.Journal of Education and Training, 40
J. Raybould, V. Sheedy (2005)
Are graduates equipped with the right skills in the employability stakesIndustrial and Commercial Training, 37
Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development
Psychological testing
Peter Cappelli (2001)
Making the most of on-line recruiting.Harvard business review, 79 3
Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development
Assessment centres for recruitment and selection
C. Collins, Rebecca Kehoe (2009)
Recruitment and Selection
UCAS
Students in Higher Education Institutions 1998/1999
Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development
Annual Survey Report 2007: Recruitment, retention and turnover
D. Steiner, S. Gilliland (2001)
Procedural Justice in Personnel Selection: International and Cross‐Cultural PerspectivesInternational Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9
J. Stewart, Vanessa Knowles (2000)
Graduate recruitment and selection: implications for HE, graduates and small business recruitersCareer Development International, 5
J. Winter (1995)
Skills for graduates in the 21st Century
P. Schofield
The difference a graduate recruitment brochure can make
J.F. Salgado, M. Lado
Validity generalization of video tests for predicting job performance ratings
W. Patton, Peter McIlveen (2009)
Annual Review : practice and research in career counseling and development – 2008
R. Candappa (2003)
University Challenged
M. Rigg, P. Elias, M. White, S. Johnson (1990)
An overview of the demand for graduates
C.J. Goodman
Roles for Graduates in the Twenty‐first Century: Getting the Balance Right
P. Pollitt
Testing graduates at Lloyds TSB: how banks select the people who will lead it into the future?
P. (Ed.) Herriot
Handbook of Assessment in Organizations
A. Keenan (1992)
Graduate recruitment and the single European marketEuropean Management Journal, 10
M. Corbridge, S. Pilbeam
Employment Resourcing
G. Nabi, David Bagley (1999)
Graduates' Perceptions of Transferable Personal Skills and Future Career Preparation in the UK.Journal of Education and Training, 41
Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development
E‐recruitment
P.R. Sackett, F. Lievens
Personnel selection
Susan Straus, J. Miles, Laurie Levesque (2001)
The effects of videoconference, telephone, and face-to-face media on interviewer and applicant judgments in employment interviewsJournal of Management, 27
H. Williams, G. Owen
Recruitment and Utilisation of Graduates by Small and Medium Sized Enterprises
F. Lievens, K. Dam, N. Anderson (2002)
Recent trends and challenges in personnel selectionPersonnel Review, 31
Filip Lievens, James Conway (2001)
Dimension and exercise variance in assessment center scores: a large-scale evaluation of multitrait-multimethod studies.The Journal of applied psychology, 86 6
J. Stewart, Vanessa Knowles (1999)
The changing nature of graduate careersCareer Development International, 4
N. Anderson, Carlijn Witvliet (2008)
Fairness Reactions to Personnel Selection Methods: An International Comparison between the Netherlands, the United States, France, Spain, Portugal, and SingaporeLabor: Personnel Economics
P. Herriot, N. Anderson
Selecting for change: how will personnel and selection psychology survive?
Industrial Relations Services
The state of selection: an IRS survey
Purpose – This paper seeks to examine the changes in the methods of graduate recruitment and selection that have been used by UK‐based organisations and to establish the reasons for the main changes and developments in the process of attracting and recruiting graduates. Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected through the use of a structured questionnaire. Questionnaires were sent to 700 UK‐based employers selected from the Prospects Directory , the Graduate Employment and Training ( GET ) Directory and the Times Top 100 Graduate Recruiters . The response rate was just over 50 per cent and the data were analysed by using the statistical analysis software SPSS. The variables used were organisation size, recruitment methods, selection methods, cost, skills and reasons for the use of methods. Findings – The analysis has shown that all employers, regardless of organisation size or activity type, tend to use more sophisticated, objective and cost‐effective methods of recruitment and selection than before. The process of graduate recruitment and selection in the UK has become more person‐related than job‐oriented because many employers are more interested in the attitudes, personality and transferable skills of applicants than the type or level of qualification acquired. Although some of the usual methods such as interviewing remain popular, there is a greater variety of ways by which graduates are attracted to and selected for their first jobs. Originality/value – The findings of this study are expected to be useful for employers considering the introduction of new graduate recruitment programmes and for those wishing to improve their existing ones as well as for institutions of higher education to reconsider the type of knowledge and skills they provide in order to prepare their students for the real world of work.
Career Development International – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 26, 2008
Keywords: Graduates; Recruitment; Selection; Higher education; Skills; United Kingdom
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.