Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Stephen Coate, T. Besley (2000)
Elected Versus Appointed Regulators: Theory and EvidenceExperimental & Empirical Studies eJournal
M. Jensen (1999)
Eclipse of the Public CorporationSPGMI: Compustat Fundamentals (Topic)
R. Sah, J. Stiglitz (1990)
The Quality of Managers in Centralized versus Decentralized Organizations
R. Birchfield, J. Mueller (2010)
Ailing DHB directors: Tony Ryall’s Health Sector Tonic
Journal of Financial Economics, 108
J. Barnard (1991)
Institutional Investors and the New Corporate GovernanceNorth Carolina Law Review, 69
G. Martin (2008)
'Ordinary people only': knowledge, representativeness, and the publics of public participation in healthcare.Sociology of health & illness, 30 1
(2015)
Municipal affairs population list
C. Frankish, B. Kwan, Pamela Ratner, Joan Higgins, Craig Larsen (2002)
Challenges of citizen participation in regional health authorities.Social science & medicine, 54 10
D. Arnwine (2002)
Effective Governance: The Roles and Responsibilities of Board MembersBaylor University Medical Center Proceedings, 15
S. Lewis, D. Kouri, C. Estabrooks, H. Dickinson, J. Dutchak, J. Williams, C. Mustard, J. Hurley (2001)
Devolution to democratic health authorities in Saskatchewan: an interim report.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 164 3
R. Saltman (2007)
Decentralization, re-centralization and future European health policy.European journal of public health, 18 2
(2015)
Diploma in Health Level 7
Ján Zábojník (2000)
Centralized and Decentralized Decision Making in OrganizationsJournal of Labor Economics, 20
O. Ciani, R. Tarricone, A. Torbica (2012)
Diffusion and use of health technology assessment in policy making: what lessons for decentralised healthcare systems?Health policy, 108 2-3
Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 16, Number 4—Fall 2002—Pages 185–205 Decentralization of Governance and Development
Jonathan Lomas, John Woods, Gerry Veenstra (1997)
Devolving authority for health care in Canada's provinces: 1. An introduction to the issues.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 156 3
Nicolaj Siggelkow, Daniel Levinthal (2003)
Temporarily Divide to Conquer: Centralized, Decentralized, and Reintegrated Organizational Approaches to Exploration and AdaptationOrgan. Sci., 14
(1987)
Why won’t directors rock the boat?
J. Slutsky, E. Tumilty, Catherine Max, Lan-Chin Lu, S. Tantivess, Renata Hauegen, J. Whitty, A. Weale, S. Pearson, A. Tugendhaft, Hu-feng Wang, S. Staniszewska, K. Weerasuriya, Jeonghoon Ahn, L. Cubillos (2016)
Patterns of public participation.Journal of health organization and management, 30 5
M. Segall (2000)
From cooperation to competition in national health systems--and back?: impact on professional ethics and quality of care.The International journal of health planning and management, 15 1
(2014)
Master of Science in Health Care Management
J. Magnussen, T. Hagen, O. Kaarboe (2007)
Centralized or decentralized? A case study of Norwegian hospital reform.Social science & medicine, 64 10
Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16
D. Hunter, K. Kieslich, P. Littlejohns, S. Staniszewska, E. Tumilty, A. Weale, Iestyn Williams (2016)
Public involvement in health priority setting: future challenges for policy, research and society.Journal of health organization and management, 30 5
L. Hooghe, G. Marks (2003)
Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level GovernanceAmerican Political Science Review, 97
M. Barnes, J. Newman, A. Knops, Helen Sullivan (2003)
Constituting ‘the public’ in public participationPublic Administration, 81
(1995)
What the NHS needs are quasi-people
S. Cranfield, J. Hendy, B. Reeves, A. Hutchings, S. Collin, N. Fulop (2015)
Investigating healthcare IT innovations: a "conceptual blending" approach.Journal of health organization and management, 29 7
A. Weale, K. Kieslich, P. Littlejohns, A. Tugendhaft, E. Tumilty, K. Weerasuriya, J. Whitty (2016)
Introduction: priority setting, equitable access and public involvement in health care.Journal of health organization and management, 30 5
A. Renedo, C. Marston (2011)
Healthcare professionals' representations of ‘patient and public involvement’ and creation of ‘public participant’ identities: Implications for the development of inclusive and bottom-up community participation initiativesJournal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 21
(2015)
New Zealand Public Health and Disability Act 2000
Miriam Schwartz-Ziv, M. Weisbach (2011)
What Do Boards Really Do? Evidence from Minutes of Board MeetingsNBER Working Paper Series
Haldor Byrkjeflot, Simon Neby (2008)
The end of the decentralised model of healthcare governance? Comparing developments in the Scandinavian hospital sectors.Journal of health organization and management, 22 4
G. Scally, L. Donaldson (1998)
Clinical governance and the drive for quality improvement in the new NHS in EnglandBMJ, 317
C. Mitton, N. Smith, S. Peacock, Brian Evoy, J. Abelson (2009)
Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review.Health policy, 91 3
(2013)
Revised annual mid-year population estimates, 2001–2010
A. Mitchell, T. Bossert (2010)
Decentralisation, Governance and Health-System Performance: ‘Where You Stand Depends on Where You Sit’Political Economy: National
(1993)
Sec and the institutional investor: a half-time report
Rita Kosnik (1987)
Greenmail: A Study of Board Performance in Corporate GovernanceAdministrative Science Quarterly, 32
R. Baggott (2005)
A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum? Reforming Patient and Public Involvement in the NHS in EnglandPublic Administration, 83
J. Alexander, S. Lee (2006)
Does governance matter? Board configuration and performance in not-for-profit hospitals.The Milbank quarterly, 84 4
(2014)
Structure
(2015)
Population estimates
A key question in the provision of public health concerns how that provision is governed. The purpose of this paper is to examine the governance structure of a public health board and its perceived impact on the efficacy of clinical operations.Design/methodology/approachStructural issues examined the level of centralisation and public participation, and whether governance should occur through elected boards or appointed managers. These issues were examined through multiple lenses. First was the intention of the structure, examining the issues identified by parliament when the new structure was created. Second, the activities of the board were examined through an analysis of board meetings. Finally, hospital clinicians were surveyed through semi-structured interviews with both quantitative and qualitative questioning.FindingsA contradiction was revealed between intention, perception and actual activities. This raises concerns over whether the public are significantly informed to elect the best-skilled appointees to governance positions.Practical implicationsThis research holds implications for selecting governance structures of public health providers.Originality/valueFew studies have looked at the role of a publicly elected healthcare governance structure from the perspective of the clinicians. Hence, this study contributes to the literature on healthcare structure and its impact on clinical operations, by including a clinician’s perspective. However, this paper goes beyond the survey and also considers the intention of the structure as proposed by parliament, and board activities or what the board actually does. This enables a comparison of intention with outcomes and perception of those outcomes.
Journal of Health Organisation and Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 8, 2019
Keywords: Government policy; New Zealand; Management; Governance; Corporate governance
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.