Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Ayres, I. Stafford (2008)
Prosperous places: taking forward the review of sub-national economic development and regeneration
S. Ayres, G. Pearce (2005)
Building regional governance in England: The view from WhitehallPolicy and Politics, 33
G. Pearce, S. Ayres (2007)
Institutional change and the challenge of policy coordination in the English regionsTown Planning Review, 78
H. Wilson (1976)
The governance of Britain
Iain Docherty, S. Gulliver, Philip Drake (2004)
Exploring the Potential Benefits of City CollaborationRegional Studies, 38
J. Mawson (2007)
Regional governance in England: past experience, future directions?International Journal of Public Sector Management, 20
A. King (2007)
The British Constitution
G. Pearce, J. Mawson, S. Ayres (2008)
Regional governance in England: A changing role for the Government's Regional Offices?Public Administration, 86
Paul Burton (2010)
Growing pains: the challenges of planning for growth in South East QueenslandAustralian Planner, 47
Dclg (2006)
Strong and prosperous communities - The Local Government White Paper
T. Marshall (2008)
Regions, Economies and Planning in England after the Sub-national ReviewLocal Economy: The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit, 23
G. Bristow (2005)
Everyone's a 'winner': problematising the discourse of regional competitivenessJournal of Economic Geography, 5
V. Bogdanor (2004)
The British Constitution in the twentieth century
A. Scott, M. Storper (2003)
Regions, Globalization, DevelopmentRegional Studies, 37
G. Pearce, S. Ayres (2009)
Governance in the English Regions: The Role of the Regional Development AgenciesUrban Studies, 46
Purpose – The objective of this paper is to explore the progress of current reforms to government in the English regions through administrative decentralisation aimed at delivering economic growth and greater accountability. Design/methodology/approach – In addition to government documents the paper is informed by the views of a range of public and non‐governmental bodies on key aspects of the reforms, including the preparation of integrated regional strategies, accountability arrangements and institutional capacity. Findings – While holding out the prospect of a more effective approach to regional policy making and delivery, implementation of the reforms carries risks for the delivery of key government policies. There is little evidence that they will assist in reversing disparities in economic growth rates between the English regions or tackle England's ingrained tradition of centralisation. There are also concerns that the prominence given to economic considerations is incompatible with delivering sustainable development. Practical implications – Greater attention needs to be given to the coordination of national policies with a regional dimension and to the sub‐national institutional capacity required to both prepare and deliver integrated regional strategies. Originality/value – Drawing on empirical evidence this paper offers insights into the administrative and policy tensions associated with ongoing reforms to sub‐national government in England.
International Journal of Public Sector Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 2, 2009
Keywords: Decentralized control; Regional development; Governance; Management strategy; England
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.