Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Ali, M. Wolski, Joanna Richardson (2017)
Strategies for using ResearchGate to improve institutional research outcomesLibrary Review, 66
B. Cronin, Lokman Meho (2006)
Using the h-index to rank influential information scientistsJ. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 57
René Bevern, Christian Komusiewicz, R. Niedermeier, Manuel Sorge, T. Walsh (2015)
H-index manipulation by merging articles: Models, theory, and experimentsArtif. Intell., 240
Lokman Meho, Kiduk Yang (2007)
Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholarJ. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 58
J. Mingers, Lea Lipitakis (2010)
Counting the citations: a comparison of Web of Science and Google Scholar in the field of business and managementScientometrics, 85
J. Priem, H.A. Piwowar, B.M. Hemminger (2012)
Altmetrics in the wild: using social media to explore scholarly impact
J. Ortega, Isidro Aguillo (2014)
Microsoft academic search and Google scholar citations: Comparative analysis of author profilesJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65
L. Bornmann (2014)
Do altmetrics point to the broader impact of research? An overview of benefits and disadvantages of altmetricsJ. Informetrics, 8
Güleda Doğan, I. Sencan, Yasar Tonta (2016)
Does dirty data affect google scholar citations?Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 53
L. Bornmann, Andreas Thor, W. Marx, H. Schier (2016)
The application of bibliometrics to research evaluation in the humanities and social sciences: An exploratory study using normalized Google Scholar data for the publications of a research instituteJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67
M. Thelwall, K. Kousha (2015)
Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 1: Citations and links to academic articles from the WebProfesional De La Informacion, 24
李德成 (2008)
获取学术信息新途径--Google Scholar
M. Ali, Joanna Richardson (2018)
Usage of academic social networking sites by Karachi social science facultyIFLA Journal, 44
A. Khan, D. Ahmed (2013)
Job satisfaction among librarians in the universities of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan: a survey
C. Oppenheim (2007)
Using the h-index to rank influential British researchers in information science and librarianshipJ. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 58
Jordi Ardanuy (2011)
Scientific collaboration in Library and Information Science viewed through the Web of Knowledge: the Spanish caseScientometrics, 90
S.U. Jan, M.A. Anwar (2013)
Impact of Pakistani authors in the GOOGLE world: a study of library and information science faculty
M. Ali, Joanna Richardson (2016)
Research Publishing by Library and Information Science Scholars in Pakistan: A Bibliometric AnalysisJournal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 4
Muhammad Mughal, K. Mahmood (2012)
The changing role of librarians in the digital world: Adoption of Web 2.0 technologies by Pakistani librariansElectron. Libr., 30
Emilio López-Cózar, N. Robinson-García, D. Torres-Salinas (2013)
The Google scholar experiment: How to index false papers and manipulate bibliometric indicatorsJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65
Kiduk Yang, Lokman Meho (2007)
Citation Analysis: A Comparison of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science
Nader Ebrahim, Hadi Salehi, M. Embi, Farid Habibi, H. Gholizadeh, Seyed Motahar (2014)
Visibility and Citation ImpactSociology of Innovation eJournal
Arslan Sheikh (2017)
Awareness and Use of Academic Social Networking Websites by the Faculty of CIIT, 5
L. Wildgaard, J. Schneider, Birger Larsen (2014)
A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicatorsScientometrics, 101
Hyunjung Kim (2014)
An Investigation of Information Usefulness of Google Scholar in Comparison with Web of Science, 25
Katy Jordan, M. Weller (2018)
Academics and Social Networking Sites: Benefits, Problems and Tensions in Professional Engagement with Online Networking.Journal of interactive media in education, 2018
Dimitra Karanatsiou, Nikolaos Misirlis, M. Vlachopoulou (2017)
Bibliometrics and altmetrics literature reviewPerformance Measurement and Metrics, 18
Syed Shah, Khalid Mahmood (2017)
Review of Google scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus search results: The case of inclusive education researchLibrary Philosophy and Practice
Emilio López-Cózar, E. Orduña-Malea, Alberto Martín-Martín (2018)
Google Scholar as a data source for research assessmentArXiv, abs/1806.04435
Siluo Yang, Feifei Wang (2015)
Visualizing information science: Author direct citation analysis in China and around the worldJ. Informetrics, 9
Mirza Naseer, K. Mahmood (2009)
LIS Research in Pakistan: An Analysis of Pakistan Library and Information Science Journal 1998-2007Library Philosophy and Practice
International Education Studies, 7
Kathryn Skhal (2006)
Wireless Information System for Emergency Responders (WISER)Journal of The Medical Library Association, 94
M. Thelwall, K. Kousha (2017)
ResearchGate versus Google Scholar: Which finds more early citations?Scientometrics, 112
Chunmei Gan, Weijun Wang (2014)
A Bibliometric Analysis of Social Media Research from the Perspective of Library and Information Science
J. Ortega, Isidro Aguillo (2012)
Science is all in the eye of the beholder: Keyword maps in Google scholar citationsJ. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol., 63
P. Jacsó (2012)
Google Scholar Author Citation Tracker: is it too little, too late?Online Information Review, 36
Ann Williams, Melissa Woodacre (2016)
The possibilities and perils of academic social networking sitesOnline Inf. Rev., 40
E. Orduña-Malea, Alberto Martín-Martín, Emilio López-Cózar (2016)
Metrics in academic profiles: a new addictive game for researchers?Revista espanola de salud publica, 90
Jöran Beel, Bela Gipp (2009)
Google Scholar's Ranking Algorithm: The Impact of Articles' Age (An Empirical Study)2009 Sixth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations
J. Hirsch (2005)
An index to quantify an individual's scientific research outputProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102 46
S. Matchett (2018)
UNSW pays for performance
M. Ali, Joanna Richardson (2017)
Pakistani LIS scholars' altmetrics in ResearchGateProgram, 51
Jo Oravec (2017)
The manipulation of scholarly rating and measurement systems: constructing excellence in an era of academic stardomTeaching in Higher Education, 22
A. Martín-Martín, E. Orduña-Malea, J.M. Ayllón, E.D. López-Cózar (2016)
The counting house: measuring those who count: presence of bibliometrics, scientometrics, informetrics, webometrics and altmetrics in the Google scholar citations, ResearcherID, ResearchGate, mendeley and Twitter
Min-Chun Yu, Y. Wu, W. Alhalabi, Hao-Yun Kao, Wen-Hsiung Wu (2016)
ResearchGate: An effective altmetric indicator for active researchers?Comput. Hum. Behav., 55
Anne-Wil Harzing, Ron Wal (2008)
Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysisEthics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8
A. Abbasi, J. Altmann, L. Hossain (2011)
Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measuresJ. Informetrics, 5
M. Falagas, E. Pitsouni, G. Malietzis, G. Pappas (2007)
Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknessesThe FASEB Journal, 22
Daniel DeSanto, Aaron Nichols (2017)
Scholarly Metrics Baseline: A Survey of Faculty Knowledge, Use, and Opinion about Scholarly MetricsColl. Res. Libr., 78
J. Mingers, M. Meyer (2017)
Normalizing Google Scholar data for use in research evaluationScientometrics, 112
Björn Hammarfelt, S. Rijcke, A. Rushforth (2016)
Quantified academic selves: the gamification of research through social networking servicesInf. Res., 21
L. Schoombee, P. du Plessis (2013)
Making the link: the library’s role in facilitating research collaboration
Alberto Martín-Martín, E. Orduña-Malea, Emilio López-Cózar (2018)
Author-level metrics in the new academic profile platforms: The online behaviour of the Bibliometrics communityArXiv, abs/1804.05599
Karen Hartman, Laura Mullen (2008)
Google Scholar and Academic Libraries: An UpdateNew Library World, 109
Erin Wimmer, M. Rethlefsen, C. Jarvis, J. Shipman (2016)
Understanding Research Impact: A Review of Existing and Emerging Tools for Nursing.Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 32 6
H. Moed, W. Burger, J. Frankfort, A. Raan (1985)
The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performanceResearch Policy, 14
K. Kousha, M. Thelwall (2017)
Are wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books?Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68
F. Naude (2017)
Comparing Downloads, Mendeley Readership and Google Scholar Citations as Indicators of Article PerformanceThe Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 78
A. Gasparyan, Bekaidar Nurmashev, Marlen Yessirkepov, Dmitry Endovitskiy, A. Voronov, G. Kitas (2017)
Researcher and Author Profiles: Opportunities, Advantages, and LimitationsJournal of Korean Medical Science, 32
The purpose of this study is to analyze the use of Google Scholar Citations’ profiling platform by library and information science (LIS) scholars in Pakistan.Design/methodology/approachPurposive sampling was used to collect Google Scholar Citations profiles between 15 November 2017 and 31 January 2018. Resultant data were analyzed in SPSS Version 21.FindingsIn terms of demographical data, the study results were consistent with previous studies of Pakistani LIS scholars. There were strong correlations between Google Scholar Citations metrics (publications, citations, h-index and i10-index). The results indicate that, compared with a 2011 survey of LIS academics in Pakistan, the overall uptake for this cohort remains relatively low. This cohort is not maximizing the opportunity provided by this specific online profiling system to increase research visibility.Research limitations/implicationsAs the study was limited to those Pakistani LIS scholars who already had a profile on ResearchGate, it would be useful to broaden the research to encompass all Pakistani LIS scholars.Practical implicationsThe role of the librarian as an adviser in scholarly communication and impact can be extended to support scholars in the adoption of new online platforms for scholarly communication and visibility.Originality/valueThere have been no published research studies on Google Scholar Citations metrics in the context of Pakistani LIS scholars as a whole.
Global Knowledge Memory and Communication – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jun 24, 2019
Keywords: Research impact; Altmetrics; Academic social networking; LIS researcher; Researcher profile; Scholarly profile
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.