Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
W. Kerr, P. Phillips (2000)
The Biosafety Protocol And International Trade In Genetically Modified Organisms
L.O. Fresco
Genetically Modified Crops, Spotlight: Issues in World Agriculture
Aarti Gupta, R. Falkner (2006)
The Influence of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: Comparing Mexico, China and South AfricaGlobal Environmental Politics, 6
C.S. Dinesh
Bt cotton has failed admits Monsanto
Joel Cohen (2005)
Poorer nations turn to publicly developed GM cropsNature Biotechnology, 23
C. James (2009)
ISAAA Briefs brief 41 Global status of Commercialized biotech/GM Crops: 2009
S. Charnovitz
The supervision of health and biosafety regulation by world trade rules
M.I. Jeffrey
Environmental governance issues in the context of international environmental law: an Australian perspective
K.M. Nielson, A.I. Myhr
Understanding the uncertainties arising from technological interventions in complex biological systems: the case of GMOs
O. Sanvido, M. Stark, J. Romeis, F. Bigler (2006)
Ecological impacts of genetically modified crops. Experiences from ten years of experimental field research and commercial cultivation
K. Ammann
The impact of agricultural biotechnology on biodiversity: a review
Sungjoon Cho (2006)
Doha's DevelopmentInternational Trade
T. Raney (2006)
Economic impact of transgenic crops in developing countries.Current opinion in biotechnology, 17 2
D. Farber (2017)
Issues in Legal Scholarship Balancing the Risks: Managing Technology and Dangerous Climate Change
P. Sampath (2004)
Agricultural Biotechnology: Issues for Biosafety Governance in Asian Countries
R.B. Singh
Biotechnology, biodiversity, and sustainable agriculture: a contradiction?
Debdatta Dobe, Rohini Sen (2009)
Genetically Modified Organism Trade Route and Biosafety-Is It a Failing Synthesis?American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 1
S.K. Mohanty, S. Chaturvedi, B. Pisupati
Mainstreaming environment, biodiversity and development concerns: lessons for SAFTA
E. Weiss (1990)
Our Rights and Obligations to Future Generations for the EnvironmentAmerican Journal of International Law, 84
E. Dasilva, E. Baydoun, A. Badran (2002)
Biotechnology and the developing worldElectronic Journal of Biotechnology, 5
FAO
FAO Report of the Panel of Eminent Experts on Ethics in Food and Agriculture
A.H. Ansari
The convention on biological diversity: a critical appraisal with special reference to Malaysia
UN HDR
Making New Technologies Work for Development
Joel Cohen, R. Paarlberg (2004)
Unlocking Crop Biotechnology in Developing Countries––A Report from the FieldWorld Development, 32
M. Altieri (2000)
The ecological impacts of transgenic crops on agroecosystem healthEcosystem Health, 6
B. Chimni (2005)
Cooption and Resistance: Two Faces of Global Administrative LawImmigration
M.C.E.J. Bronckers (2001)
More power to the WTOJournal of International Economic Law, 4
J. Treweek, Claire Brown, P. Bubb (2006)
Assessing biodiversity impacts of trade: a review of challenges in the agriculture sectorImpact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 24
Aarti Gupta (2000)
Governing Trade in Genetically Modified Organisms: The Cartagena Protocol on BiosafetyEnvironment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 42
R. Falkner (2000)
Regulating Biotech Trade: the Cartegena Protocol on BiosafetyInternational Affairs, 76
K. Bosselmann, P. Taylor
The significance of the earth charter in international law
J. McDonald
Politics, process and principle: mutual supportiveness or irreconcilable differences in the trade‐environmental linkage
M. Garcia, M. Altieri (2005)
Transgenic Crops: Implications for Biodiversity and Sustainable AgricultureBulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 25
D. MacKenzie, J. Wajcman (1987)
The Social Shaping of TechnologyTechnology and Culture, 28
K. Bosselmann (2004)
In Search of Global Law: The Significance of the Earth Charter, 8
Convention on Biological Diversity
Addis Ababa Principles and Guidelines for the Sustainable Use of Biodiversity (CBD Guidelines)
Philippe Cullet (2006)
Agricultural Genetic Engineering, International Law and Development
C. James (2006)
Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2006.
Alison Peck (2011)
Leveling the Playing Field in GMO Risk Assessment: Importers, Exporters and the Limits of ScienceAgricultural & Natural Resource Economics eJournal
Sungjoon Cho (2004)
A Bridge Too Far: The Fall of the Fifth WTO Ministerial Conference in Cancún and the Future of Trade Constitution
J. Wagner (2000)
The WTO's Interpretation of the SPS Agreement Has Undermined the Right of Governments to Establish Appropriate Levels of Protection against RiskLaw and policy in international business, 31
J.G. Hannah Piek
Looking Back and Looking Forward: The Need to Monitor, Build New Alliances and Use New Means
J. McDonald
Surging costs hit food security in poorer nations
U.P. Thomas
International ecoLomic policy: emergence and dimensions
P. Mulvany
Knowing agricultural biodiversity: managing agricultural resources for biodiversity conservation
A.I. Myhr
The precautionary principle in GMO regulations
U. Thomas (2004)
Trade and the Environment: Stuck in a Political Impasse at the WTO after the Doha and Cancun Ministerial ConferencesGlobal Environmental Politics, 4
K.N. Lee
Introduction – searching for sustainability in the new century. Symposium: Environment 2000 – New Issues for a New Century
O. Sanvido, J. Romeis, F. Bigler (2007)
Ecological impacts of genetically modified crops: ten years of field research and commercial cultivation.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology, 107
A. Gupta, R. Falkner
The influence of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety: comparing Mexico
Alison Peck (2008)
The New Imperialism: Toward an Advocacy Strategy for GMO Accountability
A. Ansari, N. Mahmod (2008)
Biosafety Protocol, SPS Agreement and export and import control of LMOs/GMOsJournal of International Trade Law and Policy, 7
P. Pinstrup‐Andersen (1999)
Agricultural biotechnology, trade and the developing countries
K. Kumari, T.C. Belt, J.I.dos Remedios Furtado
Maintaining biodiversity for sustainable development: a practical approach
José Zepeda (2006)
Coexistence, Genetically Modified Biotechnologies and Biosafety: Implications for Developing CountriesAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 88
P. Taylor (2010)
The Earth CharterJournal of Education for Sustainable Development, 4
IUCN
Genetically modified organisms and biosafety: a background paper for decision‐makers and others to assist in consideration of GM issues
R. Cooney
Precaution and invasive alien species: challenges at the interface of trade and environment regimes
Purpose – This paper seeks to provide an in‐depth discussion on the impact of agricultural biotechnology in developing and least developed countries (LDCs) as well as the concomitant biosafety concerns that might have an impact on trade and the environment whilst highlighting the importance of choosing development pathways that are conducive to the specific needs of these nations without endangering the biodiversity and affecting people's health. Design/methodology/approach – The paper adopts a socio‐legal approach by undertaking a content analysis of decided cases, relevant treaties and existing studies conducted in areas related to agricultural biotechnology within the framework of sustainable development imperatives. Findings – The paper suggests that developing countries venturing into agricultural biotechnology need to enrich the technology according to their needs and capabilities in order to be able to weigh the benefits against the risks in the production and import of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) specifically via the implementation of the “precautionary principle” and viable “risk assessment” techniques which conform to their existing international law obligations in view of the findings that most of these nations have not formulated adequate legal and institutional frameworks supported with the necessary expertise to regulate, monitor, and ensure safety of agricultural GMOs produced and/or imported by them. Practical implications – The issues and suggestions in this paper will enable the development process of developing and least developed economies to conform to the tenets of sustainable development and minimize the loss of Earth's biodiversity. Originality/value – The paper is of practical use to stakeholders and policymakers alike venturing into agricultural biotechnology. It pools the findings of a cross‐section of studies to look at the implications therein and the arising biosafety and trade issues with special reference to developing and LDCs.
Journal of International Trade Law and Policy – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 13, 2011
Keywords: Sustainable development; Biodiversity; Biosafety; Agricultural biotechnology; GM crops; Genetic modification; International trade; Developing countries
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.