Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Ruichen Jin, Wei Chen, T. Simpson (2001)
Comparative studies of metamodelling techniques under multiple modelling criteriaStructural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 23
Danielle Sieger, S. Menzel, M. Botsch (2014)
RBF morphing techniques for simulation-based design optimizationEngineering with Computers, 30
Analisi & Calcolo, 93
M. Biancolini, C. Groth (2014)
An Efficient Approach to Simulating Ice Accretion on 2D and 3D Airfoil
Marco Biancolini, Ignazio Viola, S. Ramirez (2014)
Alla ricerca delle regolazioni ottimali di una barca a vela mediante il mesh morphing
U. Cella, M. Biancolini (2012)
Aeroelastic Analysis of Aircraft Wind-Tunnel Model Coupling Structural and Fluid Dynamic CodesJournal of Aircraft, 49
M. Biancolini, C. Biancolini, E. Costa, D. Gattamelata, P. Valentini (2009)
Industrial Application of the Meshless Morpher rbf-Morph to a Motorbike Windshield Optimisation
G. Petrone, C. Hill, M. Biancolini (2014)
Track by Track Robust Optimization of a F1 Front Wing using Adjoint Solutions and Radial Basis Functions (AIAA 2014-3174)
A. Boer, M. Schoot, H. Bijl (2007)
Mesh deformation based on radial basis function interpolationComputers & Structures, 85
G. Petrone, C. Hill, M. Biancolini (2014)
Track by Track Robust Optimization of a F1 Front Wing using Adjoint Solutions and Radial Basis Functions
Y. Bai, Xuecheng Han, C. Jiang, J. Liu (2012)
Comparative study of metamodeling techniques for reliability analysis using evidence theoryAdv. Eng. Softw., 53
Armin Beckert, H. Wendland (2001)
Multivariate interpolation for fluid-structure-interaction problems using radial basis functionsAerospace Science and Technology, 5
M. Biancolini, R. Ponzini, L. Antiga, U. Morbiducci (2012)
A new workflow for patient specific image-based hemodynamics
M. Biancolini, U. Cella, M. Mancini, G. Travostino (2013)
Shaping Up: Mesh morphing reduces time required to optimize an aircraft wing, 7
A. Zuijlen, A. Boer, H. Bijl (2007)
Higher-order time integration through smooth mesh deformation for 3D fluid-structure interaction simulationsJ. Comput. Phys., 224
RBF-Morph (2014)
RBF Morph software documentation package
M. Biancolini (2011)
Mesh Morphing and Smoothing by Means of Radial Basis Functions (RBF): A Practical Example Using Fluent and RBF Morph
F. Menter (1994)
Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applicationsAIAA Journal, 32
G. Reina, A. Sala, M. Biancolini, C. Groth, D. Caridi (2014)
Store separation: theoretical investigation of wing aeroelastic response
M. Biancolini, I. Viola, M. Riotte (2014)
Sails trim optimisation using CFD and RBF mesh morphingComputers & Fluids, 93
S. Jakobsson, O. Amoignon (2007)
Mesh Deformation using Radial Basis Functions for Gradient-based Aerodynamic Shape OptimizationComputers & Fluids, 36
PurposeThe present paper aims to address the description of a numerical optimization procedure, based on mesh morphing, and its application for the improvement of the aerodynamic performance of an industrial glider which suffers of a large separation occurring in the wing–fuselage junction region at high incidence angles.Design/methodology/approachShape variations were applied to the baseline configuration through a mesh morphing technique founded on the mathematical framework of radial basis functions (RBF). The aerodynamic solutions were obtained coupling an RANS code with the mesh morphing tool RBF Morph™. Two shape modifiers were set up to generate a parametric numerical model. An optimization procedure, based on a design of experiment sampling, was set up implementing the fully automated workflow within a high performance computing (HPC) environment. The optimal candidates maximizing the aerodynamic efficiency were identified by means of a cubic RBF response surface approach.FindingsThe separation was significantly reduced, modifying the local geometry of fuselage and fairing and maintaining the wing aerofoil unchanged. A relevant aerodynamic efficiency improvement was finally gained.Practical implicationsThe developed procedure proved to be a very powerful and efficient tool in facing aerodynamic design problems. However, it might be computationally very expensive if a large number of design variables are adopted and, in those cases, the method can be suitably used only within the HPC environment.Originality/valueSuch an optimization study is part of an explorative set of analyses that focused on better addressing the numerical strategies to be used in the development of the EU FP7 Project RBF4AERO.
Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology: An International Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 3, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.