Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Wimmer (2002)
Integrated Service Modeling for Online One-stop GovernmentElectron. Mark., 12
R. Davison, Maris Martinsons, N. Kock (2004)
Principles of canonical action researchInformation Systems Journal, 14
G. Goldkuhl (2007)
What does it mean to serve the citizen in e-services? - Towards a practical theory founded in socio-instrumental pragmatismInternational Journal of Public Information Systems, 3
G. Walsham (1995)
Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and methodEuropean Journal of Information Systems, 4
M. Janssen, A.F. van Veenstra
Stages of growth in e‐government: an architectural approach
Hsinchun Chen (2003)
Digital Government: technologies and practicesDecis. Support Syst., 34
Raul Medina-Mora, T. Winograd, Rodrigo Flores, F. Flores (1992)
The action workflow approach to workflow management technologyInf. Soc., 9
G. Goldkuhl (2006)
What does it mean to serve the citizen? - Towards a practical theory on public e-services founded in socio-instrumental pragmatism
V. Cronen (2001)
Practical theory, practical art, and the pragmatic‐systemic account of inquiryCommunication Theory, 11
G. Goldkuhl, Stefan Cronholm (2010)
Adding Theoretical Grounding to Grounded Theory: Toward Multi-Grounded TheoryInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods, 9
G. Goldkuhl, Annie Röstlinger (2007)
Clarifying Government - Citizen Interaction : From Business Action to Generic Exchange
A. Strauss, J. Corbin (1998)
Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory
Davide Jones, S. Gregor (2007)
The Anatomy of a Design TheoryJ. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 8
R. Baskerville, M. Myers (2004)
Special Issue on Action Research in Information Systems: Making is Research Relevant to PracticeThe University of Auckland Business School Research Paper Series
K. Layne, Jungwoo Lee (2001)
Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage modelGov. Inf. Q., 18
K. Andersen, H. Henriksen (2006)
E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee modelGov. Inf. Q., 23
B. Jessop (1995)
The regulation approach, governance and post-Fordism: alternative perspectives on economic and political change?Economy and Society, 24
G. Goldkuhl (2009)
Innovation in a regulated environment? : Legal barriers for e-government developmentInternational Journal of Public Information Systems, 2009
P. Beynon-Davies (2007)
Models for e‐governmentTransforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 1
M. Lind, G. Goldkuhl (2003)
The constituents of business interaction - generic layered patternsData Knowl. Eng., 47
Jörgen Lundälv (2008)
Biståndsbedömares erfarenheter av biståndsbedömning för trafikskadade enligt LSS (Lag om stöd och service till vissa funktionshindrade SFS 1993:387) och uppfattning av trafikskadades vardagsliv - en enkätundersökning i kommunerna
T. Winograd, F. Flores (1987)
Understanding computers and cognition - a new foundation for design
J. Dewey (1938)
Logic, the theory of inquiry
K. Siau, Y. Long (2005)
Synthesizing e-government stage models - a meta-synthesis based on meta-ethnography approachInd. Manag. Data Syst., 105
Van Ven, H. Andrew (2007)
Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research
N. Kock, F. Lau (2001)
Information systems action research: serving two demanding mastersInformation Technology & People, 14
G. Susman, R. Evered (1978)
An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research.Administrative Science Quarterly, 23
Jonas Sjöström, G. Goldkuhl (2009)
Socio-Instrumental Pragmatism in Action
E. Deakins, Stuart Dillon (2002)
E‐government in New Zealand: the local authority perspectiveInternational Journal of Public Sector Management, 15
Z. Irani, P. Love, Tony Elliman, Steve Jones, Marinos Themistocleous (2005)
Evaluating e‐government: learning from the experiences of two UK local authoritiesInformation Systems Journal, 15
A. Evangelides
FRAMES – a risk assessment framework for e‐services
A.V. Haug
Organisational impacts of ICTs: from hierarchy to markets and networks? The challenges of developing and managing digital collaborative arrangements
G. Goldkuhl (2004)
DESIGN THEORIES IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS - A NEED FOR MULTI-GROUNDINGThe Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 6
J. Dietz (1999)
Understanding and Modelling Business Processes with DEMO
C. Argyris, R. Putnam, S.D. McLain
Action Science: Concepts, Methods and Skills for Research and Intervention
R. Wu (2007)
Enterprise integration in e‐governmentTransforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 1
A. Hevner, S. March, Jinsoo Park, S. Ram (2004)
Design Science in Information Systems ResearchMIS Q., 28
J. Walls, G. Widmeyer, O. Sawy (1992)
Building an Information System Design Theory for Vigilant EISInf. Syst. Res., 3
J. Searle (1969)
Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language
J. Hiller, F. Bélanger
Privacy strategies for electronic government, e‐government series
C. Hay (1995)
Re-Stating the problem of regulation and re-regulating the local stateEconomy and Society, 24
G. Goldkuhl (2009)
Socio-instrumental Service Modelling: An Inquiry on e-Services for Tax Declarations
A. Strauss (1992)
Basics Of Qualitative Research
A. Strauss, B. Glaser (1967)
The Discovery of Grounded Theory
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present a new theoretical model (the generic regulation model (GRM)) which is aimed for e‐government development. There is a need for such a generic model in order to describe and analyse the regulation that occurs in the interaction between governmental agencies and citizens. Design/methodology/approach – This new model has evolved through an action research project/practical inquiry in e‐government. The project area was personal assistance to disabled persons. The practical inquiry has comprised generation and application of the GRM model (as a kind of empirical grounding) and also some initial theoretical grounding. Findings – In the e‐government project there was a need to conceptualize the relations between different governmental agencies and clients. As a response to this need a generic model and a corresponding situational model were developed. The generic model consists of three layers: legislation as general regulation; application of legislation for issuing decisions ( = individual rules), i.e. specific regulation; and application of general and individual rules in regulated practices. The paper also gives an epistemological account of the evolution of the new GRM model. GRM is considered to be a practical theory and it has evolved through a design‐oriented practical inquiry. Originality/value – The paper presents this new GRM. The GRM model should be adequate to apply in many e‐government situations, since there are often regulation issues at stake. The GRM model should be used in the design and evaluation of e‐government applications.
Transforming Government People Process and Policy – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 2, 2011
Keywords: Sweden; E‐government; Regulation; Generic model; Practical inquiry; Citizens
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.