Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Jost, Aaron Kay (2005)
Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification.Journal of personality and social psychology, 88 3
S. Mu, Devi Gnyawali (2003)
Developing Synergistic Knowledge in Student GroupsThe Journal of Higher Education, 74
D. Burgess, E. Borgida (1999)
Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive and Prescriptive Gender Stereotyping in Sex DiscriminationPsychology, Public Policy and Law, 5
Linda Babcock, Sara Laschever (2003)
Women Don't Ask
A. Edmondson (1999)
Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work TeamsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 44
H. Bowles, Linda Babcock, Kathleen McGinn (2005)
Constraints and Triggers: Situational Mechanics of Gender in NegotiationJohn F. Kennedy School of Government Faculty Research Working Paper Series
C. Eden, F. Ackermann, S. Cropper (1992)
The analysis of cause mapsJournal of Management Studies, 29
B.F. Reskin, C.E. Ross
Jobs, authority, and earnings among managers: the continuing significance of sex
J. Ford, W. Hegarty (1984)
Decision Makers' Beliefs About the Causes and Effects of Structure: An Exploratory StudyAcademy of Management Journal, 27
J. Ashby, I. Schoon (2010)
Career success: The role of teenage career aspirations, ambition value and gender in predicting adult social status and earningsJournal of Vocational Behavior, 77
O' Hagan, Carol Rivchun, D. Sexton (1989)
Women-Owned Businesses
Barbara Bird, C. Brush (2002)
A Gendered Perspective on Organizational CreationEntrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26
Timothy Baldwin, Michael Bedell, Jonathan Johnson (1997)
The Social Fabric of a Team-Based M.B.A. Program: Network Effects on Student Satisfaction and PerformanceAcademy of Management Journal, 40
S. Sullivan, Lisa Mainiero (2008)
Using the Kaleidoscope Career Model to Understand the Changing Patterns of Women's Careers: Designing HRD Programs That Attract and Retain WomenAdvances in Developing Human Resources, 10
G. McNamara, R. Luce, George Tompson (2002)
Examining the effect of complexity in strategic group knowledge structures on firm performanceSouthern Medical Journal, 23
C. Colbeck, S. Campbell, S. Bjorklund (2000)
Grouping in the DarkThe Journal of Higher Education, 71
I.E. Allen, A. Elam, N. Langowitz, M. Dean
2007 Report on Women and Entrepreneurship
J. Berger (1976)
Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation-States Approach
Samuel Fraidin, A. Hollingshead (2005)
“I Know What I’m Doing”: The Impact of Gender Stereotypes about Expertise on Task Assignments in Groups, 7
L. Wirth
Breaking Through the Glass Ceiling: Women in Management. Update 2004
H. Bowles, Kathleen McGinn (2008)
Untapped Potential in the Study of Negotiation and Gender Inequality in OrganizationsOrganizations & Markets eJournal
Allan Wigfield, Ann Battle, Lisa Keller, J. Eccles (2002)
Sex differences in motivation, self-concept, career aspiration, and career choice: Implications for cognitive development.
Deborah Small, M. Gelfand, Linda Babcock, Hilary Gettman (2007)
Who goes to the bargaining table? The influence of gender and framing on the initiation of negotiation.Journal of personality and social psychology, 93 4
I. Nonaka (1994)
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge CreationOrganization Science, 5
Kathleen Carley, M. Palmquist (1992)
Extracting, Representing, and Analyzing Mental ModelsSocial Forces, 70
D. Tannen (1995)
The Power of Talk: Who Gets Heard and Why.Harvard Business Review, 73
Jill Kickul, L. Gundry (2002)
Prospecting for Strategic Advantage: The Proactive Entrepreneurial Personality and Small Firm InnovationJournal of Small Business Management, 40
Johan Wiklund, D. Shepherd (2003)
Knowledge‐based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium‐sized businessesSouthern Medical Journal, 24
J. Jacobs (1992)
Women's Entry into Management: Trends in Earnings, Authority, and Values among Salaried ManagersAdministrative Science Quarterly, 37
C.L. Colbeck, S.E. Campbell, S.A. Bjorklund
Grouping in the dark – what college students learn from group projects
D.T. Campbell, J.C. Stanley
Experimental and Quasi‐Experimental Designs for Research
S. Borgatti, P. Foster (2003)
The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and TypologyJournal of Management, 29
David Hekman, Karl Aquino, Bradley Owens, T. Mitchell, Pauline Schilpzand, Keith Leavitt (2010)
AN EXAMINATION OF WHETHER AND HOW RACIAL AND GENDER BIASES INFLUENCE CUSTOMER SATISFACTIONAcademy of Management Journal, 53
S. Nadkarni (2003)
Instructional Methods and Mental Models of Students: An Empirical InvestigationAcademy of Management Learning and Education, 2
F. Verhees, M. Meulenberg (2004)
Market Orientation, Innovativeness, Product Innovation, and Performance in Small FirmsJournal of Small Business Management, 42
J. Wajcman (1996)
Desperately Seeking Differences: Is Management Style Gendered?British Journal of Industrial Relations, 34
R. Axelrod
Structure of Decision
B. Reskin, C. Ross (1992)
Jobs, Authority, and Earnings Among ManagersWork and Occupations, 19
P. Senge (1991)
The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge
S.P. Borgatti, M.G. Everett, L.C. Freeman
UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis
V. Schein (2007)
Women in management: reflections and projectionsWomen in Management Review, 22
A. Eagly (1987)
Sex differences in social behavior : a social-role interpretation
Karsten Jonsen, M. Maznevski, S. Schneider (2010)
Gender differences in leadership – believing is seeing: implications for managing diversityEquality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 29
Paul Thagard (1996)
Mind: Introduction to Cognitive Science
A. Eagly, W. Wood, A. Diekman (2000)
Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal.
R. Barker, Martin Camarata (1998)
The Role of Communication in Creating and Maintaining a Learning Organization: Preconditions, Indicators, and DisciplinesJournal of Business Communication, 35
Loriann Roberson, Carol Kulik (2007)
Stereotype Threat at WorkAcademy of Management Perspectives, 21
L. Donaldson (1997)
Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on OrganizationsAustralian Journal of Management, 22
Mihaela Enache, J. Sallan, Pep Simó, Vicenc Fernandez (2011)
Career attitudes and subjective career success: tackling gender differencesGender in Management: An International Journal, 26
G. Powell, D. Butterfield (2003)
Gender, gender identity, and aspirations to top managementWomen in Management Review, 18
M. Cordano, R. Scherer, C. Owen (2002)
Attitudes toward women as managers: sex versus cultureWomen in Management Review, 17
B. Bird, C. Brush
A gendered perspective on organizational creation: ET&P
P.M. Senge
The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization
Y. Baruch (2004)
Managing Careers: theory and practice
James Martin, B. Martin, Paul Minnillo (2009)
Implementing a Market Orientation in Small Manufacturing Firms: From Cognitive Model to ActionJournal of Small Business Management, 47
Linda, Wirth (2003)
Breaking Through the Glass Ceiling: Women in Management
Catalyst
2010 Catalyst Census of Women Board Directors of the Fortune 500
E. Hong, H. O'Neil (1992)
Instructional strategies to help learners build relevant mental models in inferential statisticsJournal of Educational Psychology, 84
Marjorie Lyles, Charles Schwenk (1992)
TOP MANAGEMENT, STRATEGY AND ORGANIZATIONAL KNOWLEDGE STRUCTURESJournal of Management Studies, 29
L. Freeman (1978)
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarificationSocial Networks, 1
Susan Vinnicombe, Val Singh (2002)
Sex role stereotyping and requisites of successful top managersWomen in Management Review, 17
J. Walsh (1995)
Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Notes from a Trip Down Memory LaneOrganization Science, 6
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate gender differences in the formation of mental models of firm strategies. Design/methodology/approach – The specific research question is how gender, social interaction, team psychological safety and synergistic knowledge development influence certain characteristics – complexity and centrality – of an individual's mental model of firm strategies. A survey was conducted on a sample of US business students enrolled in strategic management courses. Social interaction, team psychological safety and synergistic knowledge development were measured by use of multiple‐item seven‐point Likert scales. Mental models were constructed by the causal mapping method. Hierarchical regression analyses were used to test the hypotheses. Findings – The regression analyses of the survey data support most of the hypotheses. Gender directly influences complexity and centrality in mental models of firm strategies and moderates the predictive influence of social interaction on synergistic knowledge development. Research limitations/implications – Possible limitations are the use of a student sample and of respondents as the sole data source. Future research could use managers as research subjects and multiple data sources and explore other determinants of the mental model of firm strategies. Practical implications – The findings alert university educators about the importance of helping women develop high‐order knowledge and problem‐solving skills by understanding various business functions and synthesizing diverse perspectives. Corporate managers need to design and implement special mentoring and training programs for women with the aim of enriching their specific management knowledge. This study also suggests that women may increase their chance of developing strategic knowledge by proactively networking with senior managers. Originality/value – This study on gender differences in accumulating management knowledge and skills helps us better understand the roots of and solutions to the gender gap in management and leadership positions. The most intriguing result is the demonstration of gender differences in the development of specific management knowledge. Biases against women not only contribute directly to the “glass ceiling”; more disturbingly, they negatively influence women's internal development of knowledge structures.
Gender in Management An International Journal – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 4, 2011
Keywords: United States of America; Gender; Social interaction; Women; Business strategy; Mental model; Knowledge; Management education
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.