Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Economic activity rates of disabled people and ethnic minorities
A. Furnham, Paul Stringfield (2001)
Gender differences in rating reports: female managers are harsher raters, particularly of malesJournal of Managerial Psychology, 16
M. London, H. Larsen, Lars Thisted (1999)
Relationships between Feedback and Self-DevelopmentGroup & Organization Management, 24
L. Atwater, F. Yammarino (1992)
DOES SELF‐OTHER AGREEMENT ON LEADERSHIP PERCEPTIONS MODERATE THE VALIDITY OF LEADERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE PREDICTIONS?Personnel Psychology, 45
M. Mount, T. Judge, Steven Scullen, Marcia Sytsma, Sarah Hezlett (1998)
TRAIT, RATER AND LEVEL EFFECTS IN 360‐DEGREE PERFORMANCE RATINGSPersonnel Psychology, 51
R. Osborn, W. Vicars (1976)
Sex stereotypes: an artifact in leader behavior and subordinate satisfaction analysis?Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management, 19 3
Z. Aycan (2004)
Key Success Factors for Women in Management in TurkeyApplied Psychology, 53
Peter Heslin (2005)
Conceptualizing and Evaluating Career SuccessJournal of Organizational Behavior, 26
Deborah Boice, B. Kleiner (1997)
Designing effective performance appraisal systemsWork Study, 46
(1987)
Can subordinate appraisals enhance managerial productivity
E. Lenney (1977)
Women's self-confidence in achievement settings.Psychological Bulletin, 84
Michelle Brown, J. Heywood (2005)
Performance Appraisal Systems: Determinants and ChangeWiley-Blackwell: British Journal of Industrial Relations
S. Brutus, M. London, J. Martineau (1999)
The impact of 360‐degree feedback on planning for career developmentJournal of Management Development, 18
V. Nieva, B. Gutek (1980)
Sex Effects on EvaluationAcademy of Management Review, 5
performance appraisal reported in the literature and only serve to demonstrate that the relative paucity of research in this area needs to be addressed
Jng-Lih Farh, Albert Cannella, A. Bedeian (1991)
The Impact of Purpose On Rating Quality and User AcceptanceGroup & Organization Management, 16
V. Schein (1978)
SEX ROLE STEREOTYPING, ABILITY AND PERFORMANCE: PRIOR RESEARCH AND NEW DIRECTIONSPersonnel Psychology, 31
E. Klonoff, H. Landrine (1995)
The Schedule Of Sexist Events: A Measure of Lifetime and Recent Sexist Discrimination in Women's LivesPsychology of Women Quarterly, 19
Alma McCarthy, T. Garavan (2001)
360° feedback process: performance, improvement and employee career developmentJournal of European Industrial Training, 25
I. Greener (2007)
The Politics of Gender in the NHS: Impression Management and ‘Getting Things Done’Gender, Work and Organization, 14
Carol Woodhams, Ardha Danieli (2000)
Disability and diversity – a difference too far?Personnel Review, 29
R. Santeusanio (1998)
Improving Performance with 360-Degree Feedback.Educational Leadership, 55
M. Jacobson, J. Effertz (1974)
Sex roles and leadership: Perceptions of the leaders and the ledOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12
Banking on Equal Opportunities
J. Farh, A.A. Cannella, A.G. Bedeian
Peer ratings: the impact of purpose on rating quality and user acceptance
Jeff Dalton (2018)
Peer ReviewsGreat Big Agile
(2001)
Multi-source feedback systems: a research perspective, in Robertson, I. and Cooper, C. (eds) Key Issues in Industrial & Organizational Psychology: Personnel Psychology & HRM
Catherine Ng, Warren Chiu (2001)
Managing equal opportunities for women: sorting the friends from the foesHuman Resource Management Journal, 11
M. Heilman, R. Martell, Michael Simon (1988)
The vagaries of sex bias: Conditions regulating the undervaluation, equivaluation, and overvaluation of female job applicantsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41
K. Deaux, T. Emswiller (1974)
Explanations of successful performance on sex-linked tasks: What is skill for the male is luck for the female.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29
R. Scherer, C. Owen, J. Brodzinski (1991)
Rater and Ratee Sex Effects on Performance Evaluations in a Field SettingManagement Communication Quarterly, 5
C. Fletcher, C. Baldry
Multi‐source feedback systems: a research perspective
Arthur Wohlers, M. Hall, M. London (1993)
Subordinates rating managers: Organizational and demographic correlates of self/subordinate agreementJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66
(2005)
People Resourcing, 3 edn. London, CIPD
N. Feather, J. Simon (1975)
Reactions to male and female success and failure in sex-linked occupations: impressions of personality, causal attributions, and perceived likelihood of different consequences.Journal of personality and social psychology, 31 1
E. Snape, T. Redman (2003)
Too old or too young? The impact of perceived age discriminationHuman Resource Management Journal, 13
A. Balazs (1978)
Sources of Discrimination Among Employees: A Survey Investigation:
D. Fedor, Kenneth Bettenhausen, Walter Davis (1999)
Peer ReviewsGroup & Organization Management, 24
S. Fox, T. Caspy, A. Reisler (1994)
Variables affecting leniency, halo and validity of self‐appraisalJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 67
Chris Creegan, F. Colgan, R. Charlesworth, G. Robinson (2003)
Race Equality Policies at Work: Employee Perceptions of the ‘Implementation Gap’ in a UK Local AuthorityWork, Employment & Society, 17
P. Jansen, D. Vloeberghs (1999)
Multi‐rater feedback methods: personal and organizational implicationsJournal of Managerial Psychology, 14
C. Duncan, W. Loretto (2004)
Never the Right Age? Gender and Age-Based Discrimination in EmploymentGender, Work and Organization, 11
S. Hannabuss (1998)
360‐Degree FeedbackLibrary Review, 47
Y. Baruch (1996)
Self performance appraisal vs direct‐manager appraisal: A case of congruenceJournal of Managerial Psychology, 11
Gary May, Lisa Gueldenzoph (2006)
The Effect of Social Style on Peer Evaluation Ratings in Project TeamsJournal of Business Communication, 43
J. Drexler, T. Beehr, T. Stetz (2001)
Peer Appraisals: Differentiation of Individual Performance on Group TasksHuman Resource Management, 40
W. Mobley (1982)
Supervisor and Employee Race and Sex Effects on Performance Appraisals: A Field Study of Adverse Impact and Generalizability.Academy of Management Journal, 25
M. Mount (1984)
Psychometric properties of subordinate ratings of managerial performance.Personnel Psychology, 37
Charles Skipper, L. Bell (2006)
Assessment with 360° Evaluations of Leadership Behavior in Construction Project ManagersJournal of Management in Engineering, 22
M. London, Arthur Wohlers (2006)
AGREEMENT BETWEEN SUBORDINATE AND SELF-RATINGS IN UPWARD FEEDBACKPersonnel Psychology, 44
(2002)
EOC urges local authorities to confront lack of senior women
Amy Dickerson, Mary Taylor (2000)
Self-Limiting Behavior in WomenGroup & Organization Management, 25
K. Deaux (1979)
Self-evaluations of male and female managersSex Roles, 5
K. Rodgers, C. Manifold (2002)
360-degree feedback: possibilities for assessment of the ACGME core competencies for emergency medicine residents.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 9 11
T. Garavan, M. Morley, Mary Flynn (1997)
360 degree feedback: its role in employee developmentJournal of Management Development, 16
GL50 4AZ. Laura Morse
S. Taylor
People Resourcing
Herman Aguinis, S. Adams (1998)
Social-Role versus Structural Models of Gender and Influence Use in OrganizationsGroup & Organization Management, 23
R. Griffeth, A. Bedeian (1989)
Employee performance evaluations: Note Effects of ratee age, rater age, and rater genderJournal of Organizational Behavior, 10
E. Wilson (2000)
Inclusion, exclusion and ambiguity – The role of organisational culturePersonnel Review, 29
P. Dibben, P. James, I. Cunningham
Senior management commitment to disability
B. Willey (1999)
Employment Law in Context
H. Aguinis, S. Adams
Social‐role versus structural models of gender and influence use in organizations: a strong inference approach
L. Atwater, D. Waldman, J. Brett (2002)
Understanding and optimizing multisource feedbackHuman Resource Management, 41
P. Urwin (2006)
Age discrimination: legislation and human capital accumulationEmployee Relations, 28
(2000)
Still wasting resources? Equality in employment
R. Hagen, A. Kahn (1975)
Discrimination Against Competent Women1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5
L. Shore, G. Thornton (1986)
Effects of Gender on Self- and Supervisory RatingsAcademy of Management Journal, 29
K. Bartol (1999)
Gender influences on performance evaluations.
T. Redman, E. Snape (1992)
Upward and Onward: Can Staff Appraise Their Managers?Personnel Review, 21
I. Cunningham, P. Dibben, Philip James (2001)
Senior management commitment to disability ‐ The influence of legal compulsion and best practicePersonnel Review, 30
C. Fletcher (1999)
The implications of research on gender differences in self‐assessment and 360 degree appraisalHuman Resource Management Journal, 9
D. Fedor, K. Bettenhausen, W. Davis
Employees' dual roles as raters and recipients
A. Tsui, B. Gutek (1984)
A Role Set Analysis of Gender Differences in Performance, Affective Relationships, and Career Success of Industrial Middle ManagersAcademy of Management Journal, 27
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of gender on the performance assessments of managers arising from the 360‐degree scheme operated within the UK headquarters of a large multi‐international financial services organisation. Design/methodology/approach – A questionnaire approach was used to collect data on 66 managers (33 males and 33 females) against four broad capabilities on the 360‐degree appraisal system. Data were gathered on each of the 66 managers from eight different sources including the individual being appraised, three of their peers, three of their direct reports (subordinates) and their manager (supervisor). Findings – Performance ratings were either gender neutral or higher for female than for male managers. Within the case company there was no evidence of unfavourable discrimination against female managers, if anything the reverse with female managers showing superior performance compared to their male counterparts. Research limitations/implications – As with all cross‐sectional research causality cannot be confirmed and difficulties in accessing 360‐degree appraisal information for a large number of managers led to constraints on research methodology. Practical implications – The implication for human resource management is that the 360‐degree appraisal system did not necessarily fulfil the degree of objectivity claimed by its adherents and that possible adverse influence may be inherent within the 360‐degree rating system of managers particularly. Originality/value – The paper offers insights into gender differences within 360‐degree managerial performance appraisals.
Women in Management Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 9, 2007
Keywords: 360‐degree feedback; Gender; Performance appraisal; Human resource management; United Kingdom
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.