Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Rifkin, Jonathan Millen, S. Cobb (1991)
Toward a new discourse for mediation: A critique of neutralityConflict Resolution Quarterly, 9
S. Cobb, J. Rifkin (1991)
Practice and Paradox: Deconstructing Neutrality in MediationLaw & Social Inquiry, 16
Susan Exon (2007)
The Effects that Mediator Styles Impose on Neutrality and Impartiality Requirements of MediationUniversity of San Francisco law review, 42
S. Douglas (2008)
Neutrality in Mediation: A Study of Mediator PerceptionsQUT Law Review, 8
Brian Heisterkamp (2006)
Taking the footing of a neutral mediatorConflict Resolution Quarterly, 23
K. Gibson, Leigh Thompson, M. Bazerman (1996)
Shortcomings of neutrality in mediation: Solutions based on rationalityNegotiation Journal, 12
K. Gibson (1999)
Mediator attitudes toward outcomes: A philosophical viewConflict Resolution Quarterly, 17
C. Hale, C. Nix (1997)
Achieving neutrality and impartiality: The ultimate communication challenge for peer mediatorsConflict Resolution Quarterly, 14
V. Manusov, B.H. Spitzberg, Braithwaite, D.O., Baxter, L.A.
Attributes of attribution theory: finding good cause in the search for theory
L. Mulcahy (2001)
The Possibilities and Desirability of Mediator Neutrality - Towards an Ethic of Partiality?Social & Legal Studies, 10
Nina Meierding (1993)
Does mediation work? A survey of long-term satisfaction and durability rates for privately mediated agreementsConflict Resolution Quarterly, 11
Sydney Bernard, J. Folger, H. Weingarten, Zena Zumeta (1984)
The neutral mediator: Value dilemmas in divorce mediationConflict Resolution Quarterly, 1984
Christopher Moore (1996)
The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict
Rex Fuller, William Kimsey, Bruce McKinney (1992)
Mediator neutrality and storytelling orderConflict Resolution Quarterly, 10
L. Boulle, H.H. Teh
Mediation: Principles and Practice
M. Feer (1992)
On “Toward a new discourse for mediation: A critique of neutrality” (MQ 9:2)Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 10
C.R. Berger, Philipsen, G., Albrecht, T.L.
Message production under uncertainty
K. Domenici, S. Littlejohn
Mediation: Empowerment in Conflict Management
W.P. Smith
Effectiveness of a biased mediator
T. Fisher (2001)
Advice by any other nameConflict Resolution Quarterly, 19
B. Malle, J. Knobe, Sarah Nelson (2007)
Actor-observer asymmetries in explanations of behavior: new answers to an old question.Journal of personality and social psychology, 93 4
H. Astor (2007)
Mediator Neutrality: Making Sense of Theory and PracticeSocial & Legal Studies, 16
S. McCorkle, M. Reese
Mediation Theory and Practice
E.M. Rock
Mindfullness meditation, the cultivation of awareness, mediator neutrality, and the possibility of justice
Z. Maoz, Lesley Terris (2006)
Credibility and Strategy in International MediationInternational Interactions, 32
E. Jones, R. Nisbett (1972)
The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior.
A. Garcia, Kfustie Vise, Stephen Whitaker (2002)
Disputing neutrality: A case study of a bias complaint during mediationConflict Resolution Quarterly, 20
S. Jacobs (2002)
Maintaining neutrality in dispute mediation: managing disagreement while managing not to disagreeJournal of Pragmatics, 34
J. Smith (1994)
Mediator Impartiality: Banishing the ChimeraJournal of Peace Research, 31
Nancy Burrell, William Donohue, M. Allen (1988)
Gender-Based Perceptual Biases in MediationCommunication Research, 15
American Bar Association and Association for Conflict Resolution American Arbitration Association
Model standards of conduct for mediators
K. Cloke
Mediation: Revenge and the Magic of Forgiveness
C. Berger, R. Calabrese (1975)
SOME EXPLORATIONS IN INITIAL INTERACTION AND BEYOND: TOWARD A DEVELOPMENTAL THEORY OF INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATIONHuman Communication Research, 1
J.L. Maute
Mediatory accountability: responding to fairness concerns
S.N. Exon
The effects that mediator styles impose on neutrality and impartiality
Alison Taylor (1997)
Concepts of neutrality in family mediation: Contexts, ethics, influence, and transformative processConflict Resolution Quarterly, 14
C. Ippolito, D. Pruitt (1990)
POWER BALANCING IN MEDIATION: OUTCOMES AND IMPLICATIONS OF MEDIATOR INTERVENTIONInternational Journal of Conflict Management, 1
Michael Moffitt (1997)
Casting Light on the Black Box of Mediation: Should Mediators Make Their Conduct More Transparent?
Shyam Kishore (2006)
The Evolving Concepts of Neutrality and Impartiality in MediationCommonwealth Law Bulletin, 32
S. Mccorkle (2005)
The murky world of mediation ethics: Neutrality, impartiality, and conflict of interest in state codes of conductConflict Resolution Quarterly, 23
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of the neutrality literature and suggests areas ripe for future research. Design/methodology/approach – The authors reviewed journal articles on the topic of neutrality in mediation, which included theoretical viewpoints and empirical research on practicing mediators’ understanding of neutrality. Findings – The review of literature revealed that party perspectives are largely missing from current neutrality literature. Two potential concepts emerged from the authors' review of literature that could potentially influence parties’ attributions of mediator neutrality: symmetry and transparency. Symmetry refers to the equal treatment of parties, whereas transparency refers to providing an explanation of past or future behavior. Research on whether symmetry and transparency are key influences on party assessment of mediator neutrality could make a significant contribution to the field. Research limitations/implications – The authors call on researchers with diverse methodological perspectives to examine, from the party’s perspective, important questions regarding the meaning of neutrality, mediator strategies to successfully enact neutrality and the impact of neutrality on mediation outcomes. Originality/value – Neutrality is arguably one of the most important concepts to the mediation field. Despite its significance to the field, only limited research has been conducted to better understand how neutrality is enacted in practice. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the literature and provides a launching point for future research.
International Journal of Conflict Management – Emerald Publishing
Published: Jul 8, 2014
Keywords: Mediation; Transparency; Neutrality; Impartiality; Symmetry
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.