Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Samiee, Terence Shimp, Subhash Sharma (2005)
Brand origin recognition accuracy: its antecedents and consumers’ cognitive limitationsJournal of International Business Studies, 36
Gary Insch, Jennifer McBride (2004)
The impact of country-of-origin cues on consumer perceptions of product quality: A binational test of the decomposed country-of-origin constructQuality Engineering, 49
Zhan Li, William Murray, Don Scott (2000)
Global Sourcing, Multiple Country-of-Origin Facets, and Consumer ReactionsJournal of Business Research, 47
Keller (2003)
Strategic Brand Management 2nd Ed
Guijun Zhuang, Xuehua Wang, Lianxi Zhou, Nan Zhou (2008)
Asymmetric effects of brand origin confusion: Evidence from the emerging market of ChinaInternational Marketing Review, 25
Robert Schooler (1965)
Product Bias in the Central American Common MarketJournal of Marketing Research, 2
S. Samiee (2011)
Resolving the impasse regarding research on the origins of products and brandsInternational Marketing Review, 28
J. Alba (2000)
Knowledge Calibration: What Consumers Know and What They Think They KnowJournal of Consumer Research, 27
M. Fishbein, I. Ajzen (1977)
Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and ResearchContemporary Sociology, 6
A. Josiassen, B. Lukas, G. Whitwell (2008)
Country‐of‐origin contingencies: Competing perspectives on product familiarity and product involvementInternational Marketing Review, 25
L. Bergkvist, J. Rossiter (2007)
The Predictive Validity of Multiple-Item versus Single-Item Measures of the Same ConstructsJournal of Marketing Research, 44
Jean-Claude Usunier (2011)
The shift from manufacturing to brand origin: suggestions for improving COO relevanceInternational Marketing Review, 28
A. Josiassen (2011)
Consumer Disidentification and Its Effects on Domestic Product Purchases: An Empirical Investigation in the NetherlandsJournal of Marketing, 75
G. Balabanis, A. Diamantopoulos (2008)
Brand Origin Identification by Consumers: A Classification PerspectiveJournal of International Marketing, 16
A. Drolet, D. Morrison (2001)
Do We Really Need Multiple-Item Measures in Service Research?Journal of Service Research, 3
Lianxi Zhou, Zhiyong Yang, M. Hui (2010)
Non-local or local brands? A multi-level investigation into confidence in brand origin identification and its strategic implicationsJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 38
S. Samiee (2010)
Advancing the country image construct — A commentary essayJournal of Business Research, 63
Kevin Keller (1993)
Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand EquityJournal of Marketing, 57
A. Josiassen, B.A. Lukas, G.J. Whitwell
Country‐of‐origin contingencies
S. Anholt (2009)
Places: Identity, Image and Reputation
J. Hutchinson, J. Alba (1991)
Ignoring Irrelevant Information: Situational Determinants of Consumer LearningJournal of Consumer Research, 18
P. Chao (2001)
The Moderating Effects of Country of Assembly, Country of Parts, and Country of Design on Hybrid Product EvaluationsJournal of Advertising, 30
Kevin Keller (2007)
Strategic Brand Management
Julie Pharr (2005)
Synthesizing Country-of-Origin Research from the Last Decade: Is the Concept Still Salient in an Era of Global Brands?Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 13
P. Verlegh, J. Steenkamp (1999)
A review and meta-analysis of country-of-origin researchJournal of Economic Psychology, 20
M. Bitner, B. Booms, M. Tetreault (1990)
The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents:Journal of Marketing, 54
Jean-Claude Usunier (2006)
Relevance in business research: the case of country‐of‐origin research in marketingEuropean Management Review, 3
I. Phau, P. Chao (2008)
Country-of-origin: state of the art review for international marketing strategy and practiceInternational Marketing Review, 25
M. Thakor, A. Lavack (2003)
Effect of perceived brand origin associations on consumer perceptions of qualityJournal of Product & Brand Management, 12
Gary Insch (2003)
The Impact of Country-of-Origin Effects on Industrial Buyers' Perceptions of Product Quality (1)Management International Review, 43
Peter Magnusson, Stanford Westjohn, Srdan Zdravkovic (2011)
“What? I thought Samsung was Japanese”: accurate or not, perceived country of origin mattersInternational Marketing Review, 28
J. Liefeld (2004)
Consumer knowledge and use of country-of-origin information at the point of purchaseJournal of Consumer Behaviour, 4
Peter Magnusson, Stanford Westjohn (2011)
Is There a Country-of-Origin Theory?
G. Zhuang, X. Wang, L. Zhou, N. Zhou
Asymmetric effects of brand origin confusion
G. Balabanis, A. Diamantopoulos (2011)
Gains and Losses from the Misperception of Brand Origin: The Role of Brand Strength and Country-of-Origin ImageJournal of International Marketing, 19
P. Quester, S. Dzever, Sylvie Chetty (2000)
Country‐of‐origin effects on purchasing agents’ product perceptions: an international perspectiveJournal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 15
D. Aaker (1995)
Building Strong Brands
J. Rossiter (2002)
The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketingInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, 19
L. Bergkvist, J. Rossiter (2009)
Tailor-made single-item measures of doubly concrete constructsInternational Journal of Advertising, 28
D.A. Aaker, E. Joachimstaler
Brand Leadership
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present a rejoinder. The rejoinder is written in response to the commentaries provided by Saeed Samiee and Jean‐Claude Usunier on the authors’ original research piece: “‘What? I thought Samsung was Japanese’: accurate or not, perceived country of origin matters”. Design/methodology/approach – The rejoinder is organized into three separate sections. The first section identifies areas of agreement between the authors, and Samiee and Usunier. The second section responds directly to the empirical and conceptual criticisms levied by Samiee and Usunier and clarifies the authors’ contribution. The rejoinder concludes by identifying areas of future research that may help further advance the field. Findings – In addition to responding directly to the criticism of the original study, perhaps more importantly, the authors note several areas of common ground. First, there is agreement that future country‐of‐origin (COO) research designs must be careful to not artificially expose subjects to country cues that the consumer otherwise may not have considered. Second, in a globalizing world, brand origin perception appears to be more important than “made in” labels. Originality/value – The authors do not consider the COO field outdated or irrelevant, but rather that it is a vibrant field of considerable interest to both practitioners and researchers. There is much still to be learned, and the authors hope the original research study and the ensuing debate have sparked fresh ideas and will lead to a continued effort in this interesting research field.
International Marketing Review – Emerald Publishing
Published: Sep 13, 2011
Keywords: Country of origin; Consumer attitudes; Consumer behaviour; Perception
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.