Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Walfried Lassar (1996)
STRATEGY AND CONTROL 1IN SUPPLER DISTRIBUTOR RELATIONSHIPS, AN AGENCY PERSPECTIVIE
M. Mizruchi, J. Galaskiewicz (1993)
Networks of Interorganizational RelationsSociological Methods & Research, 22
and Aldrich, J. Pfeffer (1976)
Environments of OrganizationsReview of Sociology, 2
M. Bensaou, N. Venkatraman (1995)
Configurations of inter-organizational relationships : a comparison between US and Japanese automakers
Porter M. E.
10.1108/eb025476
R. Senter, M. Flynn (1999)
Changing interorganizational patterns in the North American automotive supply chainApplied Behavioral Science Review, 7
K. Eisenhardt, C. Schoonhoven (1996)
Resource-based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial FirmsOrganization Science, 7
Stinchcombe A. L.
10.1525/9780520909625
R. Monczka, R. Trent, T. Callahan (1993)
Supply Base Strategies to Maximize Supplier PerformanceInternational Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 23
The automotive industry in North America is experiencing a period of far‐reaching reorganization. Part of that change is in the automotive supply chain, including firms in the industry, such as Ford or General Motors, that assemble the vehicles and firms that are their suppliers. The particular emphasis in the research reported below is on the new relationships among these firms in the automotive supply chain. Some of the data come from in‐depth interviews with twenty‐six senior executives in North American automotive companies, from a survey of 175 firms in the North American automotive industry, and from sessions with an advisory board of representatives of leading industry companies. Additional data derive from historical accounts of the industry. This paper briefly summarizes the differentiation of the supply chain into four types of firms, and the reallocation of tasks within the supply chain. This has meant a transfer of responsibilities from the assemblers (such as Ford) to various kinds of suppliers, and a resultant shift in the system of responsibility and authority in the supply chain. The paper then explores in detail changes in the nature of relationships among firms in the supply chain from a type termed the market model to a type termed the commitment model. Additional topics include changes in the way relationships among firms are initiated and reasons for the new type of relationship. The changes are interpreted in terms of both firm‐level and industry level‐factors. The changes and their underlying causes allow certain predictions: the process of change to the new type of relationship will continue at least until 2005; and it is uncertain how far the new mode of relationship, the commitment model, will extend through the supply chain.
American Journal of Business – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 28, 2000
Keywords: Automotive industry; Automotive supply chain; Inter‐firm relationships; Supply chain
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.