Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Schriesheim, C. Cogliser, L. Neider (1995)
Is it “trustworthy”? A multiple-levels-of-analysis reexamination of an ohio state leadership study, with implications for future researchLeadership Quarterly, 6
R. Littrell (2013)
Explicit leader behaviourJournal of Management Development, 32
(1990)
Differences in Japanese and American leadership prototypes: implications for cross-cultural training
P. Dorfman, J. Howell, Shozo Hibino, Jin Lee, U. Tate, Arnoldo Bautista (1997)
Leadership in Western and Asian countries: Commonalities and differences in effective leadership processes across culturesLeadership Quarterly, 8
Andrés Davila, Maria Crawford (2018)
Including transcendental needs in a unified model of motivationJournal of Management Development
James Anderson, D. Gerbing (1984)
The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysisPsychometrika, 49
H. Kaiser (1970)
A second generation little jiffyPsychometrika, 35
C. Schriesheim, Barbara Bird (1979)
Contributions of the Ohio State Studies to the Field of LeadershipJournal of Management, 5
S. Rogelberg, J. Stanton (2007)
Introduction Understanding and Dealing With Organizational Survey NonresponseOrganizational Research Methods, 10
S. Mehrabani, Noor Mohamad (2015)
New approach to leadership skills development (developing a model and measure)Journal of Management Development, 34
B. Donnellan, F. Oswald, Brendan Baird, Richard Lucas (2006)
The mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality.Psychological assessment, 18 2
R. Dick, J. Lemoine, Niklas Steffens, Rudolf Kerschreiter, S. Akfırat, L. Avanzi, K. Dumont, O. Epitropaki, K. Fransen, S. Giessner, Roberto González, R. Kark, Jukka Lipponen, Y. Markovits, Lucas Monzani, Gábor Orosz, D. Pandey, C. Roland-Lévy, Sebastian Schuh, Tomoki Sekiguchi, L. Song, J. Stouten, Srinivasan Tatachari, Daniel Valdenegro, Lisanne Bunderen, V. Vörös, Sut Wong, Xin‐an Zhang, S. Haslam (2018)
Identity leadership going global: Validation of the Identity Leadership Inventory across 20 countriesJournal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 91
J. Hemphill, A. Siegel, C. Westie (1952)
An exploratory study of relations between perceptions of leader behavior, group characteristics, and expectations concerning the behavior of ideal leaders
Hsien-Wen Chang, G. Lin (2008)
Effect of personal values transformation on leadership behaviourTotal Quality Management & Business Excellence, 19
F. Schmidt, Huy Le, Remus Ilies (2003)
Beyond alpha: an empirical examination of the effects of different sources of measurement error on reliability estimates for measures of individual differences constructs.Psychological methods, 8 2
Rosa Caiazza, Albert Jr, Phillip Phan, M. Simoni (2018)
An Institutional Contingency Perspective of Interlocking DirectoratesIO: Firm Structure
Karyn Boatwright, Frederick Lopez, E. Sauer, Abbie VanDerWege, Daniel Huber (2010)
The Influence of Adult Attachment Styles on Workers' Preferences for Relational Leadership BehaviorsThe Psychologist-Manager Journal, 13
J. Stanton, E. Sinar, W. Balzer, P. Smith (2002)
ISSUES AND STRATEGIES FOR REDUCING THE LENGTH OF SELF‐REPORT SCALESPersonnel Psychology, 55
T. Judge, Ronald Piccolo, Remus Ilies (2004)
The forgotten ones? The validity of consideration and initiating structure in leadership research.The Journal of applied psychology, 89 1
Gregory Smith, D. McCarthy, Kristen Anderson (2000)
On the sins of short-form development.Psychological assessment, 12 1
(2013)
Explicit leader behavior: a review of literature, theory development, and research project results
L. Cronbach, P. Meehl (1955)
Construct validity in psychological tests.Psychological bulletin, 52 4
Ghulam Mustafa, Rune Lines (2016)
The Emergence and Effects of Culturally Congruent Leadership: Current Status and Future DevelopmentsEntrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 4
R. Littrell, Gillian Warner-Søderholm, I. Minelgaite, Y. Ahmadi, Serene Dalati, Andy Bertsch, Valentina Kuskova (2018)
Explicit preferred leader behaviours across cultures: instrument development and validationJournal of Management Development, 37
P. Dorfman, Mansour Javidan, P. Hanges, Ali Dastmalchian, R. House (2012)
GLOBE: A twenty year journey into the intriguing world of culture and leadershipJournal of World Business, 47
The purpose of this paper is to refine and validate the most widely used leader behavior measurement instrument, LBDQXII, into a more parsimonious instrument for assessing cognitive templates of preferred leader behavior across cultures.Design/methodology/approachThe 100-item LBDQXII survey was administered to 6,451 participants from 14 countries; these data were used to refine the survey.FindingsThe shorter survey instrument is a valid and reliable tool for assessing preferred leader behavior. Four periods in the LBDQXII “evolution” are identified: emergence, expansion, stagnation and revival.Research limitations/implicationsThe new LBDQ50 can be used to collect data across cultures, contributing to both global management development and scholarly studies.Practical implicationsThis project corresponds to calls to shorten the well-established leader behavior instrument into a measurement tool that is reliable and valid across cultures and languages. This can be administered by both private and public organizations, contributing to greater effectiveness. Furthermore, it retains its scholarly scope encompassing follower-centric studies of leadership.Social implicationsLeadership processes are found in all aspects of life and can be better understood and improved within and across cultures using the shorter version.Originality/valueAn efficient instrument to measure preferred leadership behavior across and within cultures. The availability of the LBDQ50 will allow practitioners and researchers to advance understanding of preferred leadership behavior as a predictor of organizational effectiveness. Most such instruments are overly-long, which hinders data collection opportunities. This newly developed instrument can lead to better response rates and easier applicability in organizational settings.
Journal of Management Development – Emerald Publishing
Published: Feb 3, 2020
Keywords: Cross-cultural management; Leadership development; Surveys; Management development; Validation
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.