Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Candan (2006)
Effect of alloying additions on the porosity of SiCp preforms infiltrated by aluminiumMaterials Letters, 60
G. Straffelini, M. Pellizzari, A. Molinari (2004)
Influence of load and temperature on the dry sliding behaviour of Al-based metal-matrix-composites against friction materialWear, 256
F. Akhtar, Shi-ju Guo (2006)
Development of Si3N4/Al composite by pressureless melt infiltrationTransactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 16
R. Deuis, C. Subramanian, J. Yellup (1996)
Abrasive wear of aluminium composites—a reviewWear, 201
J. Hemanth (2005)
Tribological behavior of cryogenically treated B4Cp/Al–12% Si compositesWear, 258
F. Tang, Xiaoling Wu, S. Ge, Jichun Ye, Hua Zhu, M. Hagiwara, J. Schoenung (2008)
Dry sliding friction and wear properties of B4C particulate-reinforced Al-5083 matrix compositesWear, 264
M. Korkut (2003)
Microstructure and wear behavior of Al2024\SiFe and Al2024\SiFe\Al2O3 compositesTribology International, 36
R. Uyyuru, M. Surappa, S. Brusethaug (2007)
Tribological behavior of Al–Si–SiCp composites/automobile brake pad system under dry sliding conditionsTribology International, 40
M. Acilar, F. Gül (2004)
Effect of the applied load, sliding distance and oxidation on the dry sliding wear behaviour of Al–10Si/SiCp composites produced by vacuum infiltration techniqueMaterials & Design, 25
S. Chong, H. Atkinson, H. Jones (1993)
Effect of ceramic particle size, melt superheat, impurities and alloy conditions on threshold pressure for infiltration on SiC powder compacts by aluminium-based meltsMaterials Science and Engineering A-structural Materials Properties Microstructure and Processing, 173
A. Demir, Necat Altinkok, F. Findik, İ. Özsert (2004)
The Wear Behaviour of Dual Ceramic Particles (Al2O3/SiC) Reinforced Aluminium Matrix CompositesKey Engineering Materials, 264-268
A.E. Anderson
Friction and wear of automotive brakes
D. Miracle (2005)
Metal matrix composites – From science to technological significanceComposites Science and Technology, 65
H. Jang, K. Ko, S. Kim, R. Basch, J. Fash (2004)
The effect of metal fibers on the friction performance of automotive brake friction materialsWear, 256
P. Rohatgi, R. Guo, P. Huang, S. Ray (1997)
Friction and abrasion resistance of cast aluminum alloy-fly ash compositesMetallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 28
Nandini Natarajan, S. Vijayarangan, I. Rajendran (2006)
Wear behaviour of A356/25SiCp aluminium matrix composites sliding against automobile friction materialWear, 261
A. Martin, M. Martínez, J. Llorca (1996)
Wear of SiC-reinforced Al-matrix composites in the temperature range 20–200°CWear, 193
K. Konopka, M. Szafran (2006)
Fabrication of Al2O3–Al composites by infiltration method and their characteristicJournal of Materials Processing Technology, 175
S. Kumar, V. Balasubramanian (2008)
Developing a mathematical model to evaluate wear rate of AA7075/SiCp powder metallurgy compositesWear, 264
Szu-Ying Yu, H. Ishii, K. Tohgo, Y. Cho, Dong-feng Diao (1997)
Temperature dependence of sliding wear behavior in SiC whisker or SiC particulate reinforced 6061 aluminum alloy compositeWear, 213
Purpose – The main goal of the present study is to investigate the friction and wear behaviors of aluminum matrix composites with an A360 matrix reinforced with SiC, B 4 C and SiC/B 4 C particles. Design/methodology/approach – Un‐reinforced aluminum casting alloy, Al/SiC, Al/B 4 C and Al/SiC/B 4 C aluminum composites were prepared for the present study. Friction and wear tests of aluminum and its composites versus AISI316L stainless steel were carried out for dry sliding condition using by a pin‐on‐disc arrangement. Tests were realized at the sliding speed of 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 ms −1 and under the loads of 10, 20 and 30 N. The microstructures of the present composites were examined by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectroscopy analysis. Findings – The coefficient of friction of the composites is approximately 25‐30 percent lower than that of the un‐reinforced aluminum. The specific wear rate of the aluminum and its composites decreases with the increase in load and increases with the increment of sliding speed. Un‐reinforced aluminum has specific wear rate value of 1.73×10 −13 which is the highest specific wear rate, while Al+17%SiC has specific wear rate value of 2.25×10 −13 m 2 N −1 which is the lowest specific wear rate among the tested materials. The average specific wear rates for Al+17%B 4 C, Al+17%SiC/B 4 C and Al+17%SiC composites are obtained about 49, 79 and 160 percent lower than aluminum wear rate under the same test conditions, respectively. Originality/value – In the present study, composites were prepared by pressured infiltration technique. The employed composites are important in industry due to their higher wear resistance, light in weight and less thermal distortion comparing to conventional composites. Also, wear behavior of Al/B 4 C, Al/SiC/B 4 C and Al/SiC composites produced by pressured infiltration technique were not studied very much earlier, therefore more explanation about these composites were proposed.
Industrial Lubrication and Tribology – Emerald Publishing
Published: Aug 16, 2011
Keywords: Aluminium; Composite materials; Porous materials; Wear; Friction; Infiltration
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.