Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Four blind alleys of scenario analysis

Four blind alleys of scenario analysis Purpose – Some scenario projects, especially those that take short cuts, have design flaws that undermine the whole purpose of scenario analysis. This article aims to investigate these. Design/methodology/approach – This article is a guide to avoiding four common project flaws. Findings – Selecting one desired future and using scenario analysis to promote it to the exclusion of other possibilities is not a wise approach. Practical implications – Scenarios that ignore the likelihood of serious competition from fledgling startups, market invaders from other industries, or even the possibility of several companies combining to gain the competencies needed to be a threat, are not addressing the future’s full spectrum of competitive uncertainty. Originality/value – By becoming aware of the four “blind alleys” of scenario analysis warned about in this article, practitioners are more likely to use this planning tool effectively to scope out the true outlines of uncertainty or the fallout from discontinuity and prepare their firm to cope with new realities. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Strategy & Leadership Emerald Publishing

Four blind alleys of scenario analysis

Strategy & Leadership , Volume 42 (6): 5 – Nov 11, 2014

Loading next page...
 
/lp/emerald-publishing/four-blind-alleys-of-scenario-analysis-0D4xd1yvgu

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Emerald Publishing
Copyright
Copyright © Emerald Group Publishing Limited
ISSN
1087-8572
DOI
10.1108/SL-09-2014-0068
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Purpose – Some scenario projects, especially those that take short cuts, have design flaws that undermine the whole purpose of scenario analysis. This article aims to investigate these. Design/methodology/approach – This article is a guide to avoiding four common project flaws. Findings – Selecting one desired future and using scenario analysis to promote it to the exclusion of other possibilities is not a wise approach. Practical implications – Scenarios that ignore the likelihood of serious competition from fledgling startups, market invaders from other industries, or even the possibility of several companies combining to gain the competencies needed to be a threat, are not addressing the future’s full spectrum of competitive uncertainty. Originality/value – By becoming aware of the four “blind alleys” of scenario analysis warned about in this article, practitioners are more likely to use this planning tool effectively to scope out the true outlines of uncertainty or the fallout from discontinuity and prepare their firm to cope with new realities.

Journal

Strategy & LeadershipEmerald Publishing

Published: Nov 11, 2014

There are no references for this article.