Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1905)
Rapid-cutting steel tool
(1924)
On the application of SOL
(1925)
Method of rationalization research work
(1926)
Issues of methodology and organizational policy in the field of management technics
(1922)
Five basic principles of management
(1923)
Survey and Reorganization of Enterprises and Institutions
(1923)
System in terminology
(1921)
New Economic Policy and industry
(2014)
N.N. Savvin and formation of Taylorism in Russia
C. Babbage
Economy of Machinery and Manufactures
(1803)
Note on the establishment of judicial and government institutions in Russia
(1924)
The tasks of CCC and WPI
A.A. Semenov (2010)
The Origin of Scientific Management Systems
(1883)
Vstupitelnaja lekcija v kurs uchenija j vnutrennem upravlenii
(2018)
Management IssuesParent-Infant Psychodynamics
(1903)
Shop management
T. Dick, P. Pilowsky (2010)
ForewordRespiratory Physiology & Neurobiology, 174
C. Oh, Ho Kim, Jitae Kim, Won Kim, Hyoungseok Lee, C. An (2011)
Organization of nif gene cluster in Frankia sp. EuIK1 strain, a symbiont of ElaeagnusumbellataArchives of Microbiology, 194
R. Hébert, A. Link (2009)
A History of Entrepreneurship
(1965)
SOL and WPI: interview with WPI Commissar
Journal of Legal Bulletin
F. Taylor (2015)
Fundamentals of Scientific Management
(1915)
The general economic and social significance of the Taylor system
During the first quarter of the twentieth century in Russia rapidly developed management thought, generated by many reasons, including socio-economic and political transformations, the results of scientific and practical activities of domestic and foreign experts in management. The purpose of this paper is, first, to acquaint readers with some of factors of the development of the history of Russian Management Thought in nineteenth century and at the beginning of twentieth century and, second, to present the most striking results of the formation of the History of Soviet Management Thought (SMT) in post-revolutionary Russia in the form of the movement of the so-called “The scientific organization of labor” (SOL), including “The scientific organization of managerial labor” (or SOML).Design/methodology/approachThe review and causal analysis of the process of formation of the SMT and historiography of the SMT, a brief description of the institutions of SOL and SOMT and a comparative analysis of little-known works of some Russian authors on management topics of nineteenth century are chosen as research methods.FindingsThe paper emphasizes the action of objective historical inertia (or “non-Markoviness”) of the process of development of managerial thought, manifested, on the one hand, in the stable action of some management paradigms but, on the other hand, in identifying paradigmatic anomalies, in identifying the need for constant development of managerial thought, in the development of sought-after ideas and concepts of management, and even in the institutionalization of applied scientific research in the field of management throughout the country (in the form of SOL and SOML).Originality/valueThe paper attempts to attract the attention of researchers to the little-known Russian and Soviet authors and their little-known works in the field of management thought.
Journal of Management History – Emerald Publishing
Published: Oct 7, 2019
Keywords: History; Management; Management thought
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.